The second open letter to UK-listed trusts and shareholders
On 10 February 2025, Saba Capital Management launched a second campaign targeted at UK-listed investment trusts after the requisitioned shareholder meetings at six of the seven targeted trusts rejected Saba’s proposals to oust the existing boards (the shareholders meeting for Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust (EWI) is to be held on 12 February 2025).
The activist fund now proposes to change the structure of four trusts (two of which were targeted in the first campaign) to open-ended funds, while keeping the management and investment strategy intact. The four funds are CQS Natural Resources Growth & Income (CYN), The European Smaller Companies Trust (ESCT), Middlefield Canadian Income Trust (MCT) and Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund (SCP). According to Saba’s announcement, the proposed change in structure is aimed at closing the discount to NAV and providing shareholders with an opportunity to liquidate their investment. Saba holds a 29–30% stake in CYN, ESCT and MCT, and 11% in SCP (at the time of the announcement). Shareholders of CYN and ESCT opposed previous proposals during meetings held on 4 and 5 February. We encourage all investors to vote at the upcoming general meetings.
The first open letter to UK-listed trusts and shareholders
In late December 2024, Saba Capital Management requisitioned general meetings for seven investment trusts, proposing to replace their boards of directors. The London market needs permanent capital vehicles and the impact of the proposal has much broader implications for the LSE. Shareholders of six UK-listed investment trusts faced a crucial vote during general meetings. The trusts were Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust (USA), CQS Natural Resources Growth & Income (CYN), The European Smaller Companies Trust (ESCT), Keystone Positive Change Investment Trust (KPC), Henderson Opportunities Trust (HOT) and Herald Investment Trust (HRI).
Their shareholders needed to either approve or reject the agenda pursued by Saba, a US hedge fund, which has built sizeable stakes of c 20–30% in these trusts before the announcement, mostly by using a leveraged strategy via total return swaps. After carefully considering Saba’s radical proposals to oust the existing boards, replace them with new directors proposed by Saba and take over the management of the assets, the existing shareholders overwhelmingly objected the proposals (at the meetings already held). We believe Saba was likely to favour a plain opportunistic arbitrage strategy to exploit the discounts to NAV among UK-listed investment trusts (by replicating the strategy of Saba Closed-End Funds ETF; ticker: CEFS), coupled with growing its own assets under management and fee income, over providing shareholders with a truly differentiated value proposition tailored to each of these trusts.
See more from Edison on the topic:
See more from Edison on the underlying trusts:
Find out more below
Results of the AGMs