Edison’s proprietary Illuminator stock selection tool is lighting up the markets again. Outperforming the UK All-Share on a one-month, three-month and six-month basis, it has lagged slightly on a one-year basis. Despite this small hiccup, we remain confident in the fundamental law that companies which generate returns in excess of their cost of capital will deliver positive returns for shareholders over time. Our Illuminator has greatly outperformed the UK All-Share index with a lifetime outperformance of 1,295%.
We explored the inner workings of the Illuminator to review the fund’s top 10 holdings, which read like a ‘who’s who’ of Britain’s brightest companies.
Rolls-Royce is especially flashing green, with shares surging by 222% in 2023. The company’s blue-chip restructuring is in overdrive under new management. By rightsizing costs and improving free cash flow, Rolls-Royce is roaring back to investment-grade status. Its relatively new management has focused on improving profit margins and the balance sheet.
The civil aerospace and defence businesses are dropping the hammer, with operating profit guidance now 44% higher amid strong travel demand and growth driven by the war in Ukraine.
With markets having what can only be described as a non-vintage year, we are still finding companies that continue to build value and deliver returns for shareholders.
What makes a company shine? The 10 key criteria of The Illuminator:
1. High-quality product or service
These two factors are unavoidably interlinked and have a foundation in basic classic economics. Differentiated products and services, which are often highly specialised or value added, help provide defensible (and often first-mover) advantages that are typically seen in terms of dominant market share. Tangible examples include the existence of patents, advantages in low-cost production, superior distribution or IT. More intangible examples could include human capital, customer service and branding. We do not (as yet) have an objective mechanism for capturing this and rely on our more subjective analysis and experience. Against this background, for each company that appears in our screen, we feel it integral to meet management face to face and subsequently maintain an ongoing dialogue.
2. Superior management
While somewhat subjective, assessing management quality is as important to us as the fundamentals of a business. We use total shareholder return as a mechanism for capturing this. For companies that we add to our portfolio, we look to meet with management and expect to see evidence of a well-defined business plan with clear targets; we also look for focused businesses. In addition, we expect management teams to be pioneering, with a clear vision, the ability to anticipate change, adapt and – above all – act in the interest of shareholders.
3. Larger than average compound earning
High earnings growth over a business cycle should be the logical companion of high-quality products/services and superior management teams. We acknowledge that in an environment where flexibility over pricing and margins has its limitations, demand (for products/services) must be sustainable for earnings growth to be generated.
4. Consistency and predictability
Economic cycles happen and can cause significant variations in a company’s operational performance. Our contention, therefore, is that if there are recurring patterns of demand for a company’s products/services, it should be less at risk to changes in the economy and its earnings, correspondingly, should be more predictable. Investors will also likely recognise consistency and predictability by attributing a higher multiple (of earnings, etc) to that business. We measure this factor in terms of a standard deviation, where the closer the figure is to zero, the better a company’s earnings consistency.
5. Projected annual growth in earnings
While track record is important, we feel future earnings potential also matters. We rank companies by forecast earnings growth for the next three years. We use consensus estimates and look to roll forward our three-year time horizon regularly. Longer-term growth is, in our view, indicative of a company’s ability to grow above the rate of the economy and have sufficient pricing power to offset inflation. Against this background, investors should be willing to reward a higher projected growth rate via higher multiples.
6. Balance sheet strength
We expect companies to be in a position to finance their own growth: over the course of an economic cycle, we look at overall financial leverage. Robust balance sheets can help reduce earnings volatility and write-downs.
7. High profitability
Expansion and delivery on growth and profitability strategies are shown by improving levels of capital return. Moreover, companies with high levels of returns on capital should be in a stronger
position to return capital to shareholders. Investors also tend to reward improving capital return levels in the form of higher multiples.
8. Free cash flow generation
Well-managed businesses typically have strong free cash flow-generating abilities, a function of the fact that they tend to be less capital-intensive in nature and/or produce high capital investment returns relative to their assets. Shareholders are often the beneficiaries of management’s ability to generate free cash flow and are typically rewarded via dividend payments and/or share buybacks. As with return on capital, there are a number of ways in which free cash flow generation can be defined.
9. International competitiveness
This factor is not applicable to all companies in our universe, but our contention is that globally leading companies with sustainable competitive advantages and/or differentiated propositions (as in our first quality characteristic) have the ability to develop via geographical expansion, resulting in market share gains. Global competitive decisions may also have a greater influence.
10. Valuation: Reasonable purchase price
We believe in investing in growth at the right price: high-quality companies with above-average growth prospects, good financial discipline and an attractive valuation typically generate above-average returns. We recognise that investors should be willing to pay more for higher quality, but context is everything. We assess ‘reasonable’ purchase price using forward earnings and EBITDA multiples, and assess ‘reasonability’ in an absolute, sector-relative and market-relative context.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping us understand which section of the website you find more interesting and useful. See our Cookie Policy for more information.
Strictly necessary and functional
These cookies are used to deliver our website and content. Strictly necessary cookies relate to our hosting environment, and functional cookies are used to facilitate social logins, social sharing and rich-media content embeds.
Advertising
Advertising Cookies collect information about your browsing habits such as the pages you visit and links you follow. These audience insights are used to make our website more relevant.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Performance
Performance Cookies collect anonymous information designed to help us improve the site and respond to the needs of our audiences. We use this information to make our site faster, more relevant and improve the navigation for all users.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!