Four producing assets again
The development of Elikhulu should increase group-wide output at Pan African to c 181koz in FY20 and will largely replace production lost from Evander underground, albeit at a much higher margin – which underpins our longer-term earnings and cash-flow expectations.
Exhibit 3: Edison estimate of PAF production, FY17–FY20e (oz)
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research
|
At the same time, however, the price of gold has fallen by 8.2%, or more than US$100/oz, from over US$1,300/oz in the first five months of CY18 to under US$1,200/oz at the time of writing – only partially offset by a 5.3% decline in the value of the South African rand relative to its FY18 average. As a result, we have reduced our gold price forecast for H119, which has reduced our earnings and cash-flow expectations (all other things being equal) and, consequently, our absolute value of PAF (based on its four producing assets) from 13.01p per share (see EGM’s Parthian shot, published on 19 July 2018) to 12.50p per share, based on the present value of our estimated maximum potential stream of dividends payable to shareholders over the life of its mining operations (applying a 10% discount rate).
Exhibit 4: PAF estimated life of operations diluted EPS and (maximum potential) DPS
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, Pan African Resources
Note that Edison’s EPS updated forecast of 1.09p in FY19 compares to a mean consensus forecast of 1.172p within a range 0.000–1.700p (source: Bloomberg 11 October), while its FY20 forecast of 1.83p compares to a mean consensus of 1.940p within a range 1.3–2.8p. |
In the wake of the Evander underground closure, PAF could deem the Evander underground resource to be one of its assets, albeit one that should now be valued as an in-situ resource, rather than, as previously, on the basis of future earnings, cash flows, dividends, etc. At the current time, we estimate the underground resource at Evander (including 7 Shaft vamping, Rolspruit, Poplar and Evander South, but excluding 8 Shaft and Egoli, which is valued separately – see Exhibit 7) to be 20.1Moz, categorised as follows:
Exhibit 5: Evander underground resource estimate
Resources |
Tonnes (kt) |
Grade (g/t) |
Moz |
Measured |
0 |
0.00 |
0.000 |
Indicated |
48,276 |
10.24 |
15.892 |
Inferred |
18,350 |
7.18 |
4.236 |
Total |
66,626 |
9.40 |
20.127 |
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research
The value of Witwatersrand basin resources (where Evander is located) has proven to be persistently difficult to place within a global context – a problem exacerbated by an absence of pure Wits basin exploration companies. PAF bought Evander from Harmony in mid-2012 at a price equivalent to US$5.26 per resource ounce (albeit the gold price was then materially higher, averaging US$1,668/oz in that year). Since then, we estimate that PAF has mined 415,840oz from Evander excluding the ETRP (389,229oz from underground sources), ie implying only 1.2% depletion relative to the acquired underground resource of 32.52Moz. More recently, Sibanye acquired Wits Gold (although not then a pure exploration company) at a price equivalent to US$0.22/oz, at a time when the gold price was c US$1,225/oz. Otherwise, a value for in-situ Witwatersrand gold ounces may be imputed from the US$2.78/oz value calculated by us for Bushveld platinum equivalent ounces (there still being pure platinum explorers in South Africa) in our report, Mining overview: Unlocking the price to NPV discount, published in November 2017 – contingent on investors accepting the similarities between Bushveld and Witwatersrand geology in terms of depth, reef width and continuity, mining methods, etc. On the basis of these three valuation points, the in-situ value of the Evander underground assets could range from 0.23–5.49 US cents per PAF share, as shown below:
Exhibit 6: EGM underground
Valuation basis |
Wits Gold acquisition in December 2012 |
Bushveld PtE exploration oz (Edison November 2017) |
PAF acquisition of EGM in 2012 |
In-situ value (US$/oz) |
0.22 |
2.78 |
5.26 |
Implied EGM underground valuation (US$m) |
4.4 |
56.0 |
105.9 |
Ditto (US cents per share) |
0.23 |
2.90 |
5.49 |
Ditto (pence per share) |
0.17 |
2.19 |
4.15 |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Note that, relative to the equivalent valuation in our report entitled Pan African Resources: EGM’s Parthian shot, published on 19 July 2018, the only change in our valuation in Exhibit 6 reflects changes in prevailing forex rates.
Other major assets attributable to Pan African include the Egoli project (formerly the 2010 pay channel project) at Evander, the Fairview sub-vertical shaft project and the Royal Sheba project.
The results of a recent optimisation study based on an earlier DRA Global feasibility study on Egoli are:
■
initial capex of ZAR870m (vs ZAR572m previously);
■
a pre-tax internal rate of return of 34% based on a gold price of ZAR547,000/kg (cf 46% previously);
■
a project pre-tax NPV of ZAR1.04bn at a 12.4% real discount rate or ZAR1.354m at a 10% discount rate (cf ZAR1.74bn at a 10% discount rate, previously); and
■
an incremental all-in sustaining cost of c ZAR300,000/kg over the life of the mine (cf ZAR275,000/kg previously).
Adjusting our existing model (see our note Pan African Resources: A second glance at the first half, published on 23 April 2018) to incorporate the higher capex and opex than previously forecast, we calculate an NPV for potential dividends payable by Egoli to investors of £68.0m, at its customary 10% discount rate, or 3.53p/share. Readers should note, however, that while still attractive, management is not making the Egoli project a priority in the foreseeable future owing to its deep level ‘Witwatersrand’ nature.
Recent drilling at Royal Sheba has increased resources once again, most recently from 720koz to 899koz – 39% of which is at or near surface at a grade of 3.81g/t. The mineralisation is encapsulated in a shear envelope of the Sheba Fault, ranging in width from 5–25m, with gold occurring in sulphide minerals and as native gold. In-situ grades range from 0.5g/t to 174g/t. Significantly, however, the mineralisation is non-refractory and amenable to processing via normal CIL methods and, as a result, could increase gold production from Barberton “significantly” in future years by a means of an open pit and a simple expansion of processing capacity. Management expects to finalise a definitive feasibility study for Royal Sheba by February 2019. However, it is expected that this project will be financeable from debt and cash flows only, without recourse to the equity market. In the meantime, at Pan African’s prevailing enterprise value rating of US$10.13 per resource ounce, Royal Sheba’s resources are worth a pro-rata US$9.1m, or 0.47 US cents, or 0.36p, per share.
Following the success at Royal Sheba, Pan African has also embarked on an extended exploration programme within Barberton Mines’ mining right at both the Sheba and New Consort mines around historical workings and for potential new satellite deposits.
Finally, Pan African has commenced construction of a new sub-vertical shaft at Fairview to bypass the hoisting bottleneck at its No 3 Decline and to facilitate improved access to additional mining platforms below 42 Level at the high grade 11-block of the MRC. Project capex is forecast to be ZAR105m over two to three years. Following commissioning of the shaft, it is expected that productivity improvements will yield an additional 7–10koz of gold per annum owing to the increased hoisting capacity.
Including its growth projects, a summary of our overall valuation of PAF is therefore now as follows:
Exhibit 7: PAF absolute valuation summary
Project |
Current valuation (pence/share) |
Previous valuation (pence/share) |
Existing three producing assets plus Elikhulu |
12.50 |
13.01 |
Egoli |
3.53 |
3.91 |
Fairview Sub-Vertical Shaft Project |
0.46 |
0.46 |
Royal Sheba |
*0.36 |
N/A |
MC Mining shares* |
0.16 |
0.15 |
Sub-total |
17.01 |
17.53 |
EGM underground resource |
0.17–4.15 |
0.17–4.15 |
Total |
17.18–21.16 |
17.70–21.68 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *Provisional pending finalisation of DFS.
Note that the valuation changes to the Fairview Sub-Vertical Shaft project also reflect changes to prevailing foreign exchange rates only.