Q4 and FY17 in perspective
Overall, production attributable to WPM during FY17 was 28.6Moz Ag and 355koz Au, compared with guidance of 28Moz Ag and 340koz Au and our most recent forecast of 28.5Moz Ag and 343koz Au. Results for Q4 were notable for the close correlation of production and sales, demonstrating the traditional ‘flush through’ effect in the final quarter of the year. From a financial perspective, results were better than our prior expectations for both Q417 and FY17, partly on account of an increase in gold production compared to the prior quarter, but also on account of a material increase in other income, which largely reflected fees from contract amendments and reconciliations. Excluding this item, Q4 net earnings would otherwise have been US$80.9m (assuming no taxation effect) cf our prior forecast of US$78.1m – a 3.6% positive variance. A summary of WPM’s Q4 results, as calculated by Edison, relative to both Q3 and our prior expectations is as follows:
Exhibit 1: Wheaton Precious Metals FY17 forecast, by quarter*
US$000s (unless otherwise stated) |
Q117 |
Q217 |
Q317 |
Q417e |
Q417 |
Chg** (%) |
Diff*** (%) |
FY17e |
FY17 |
Diff**** (%) |
Silver production (koz) |
6,513 |
7,192 |
7,595 |
7,156 |
7,211 |
-5.1 |
0.8 |
28,456 |
28,646 |
0.7 |
Gold production (oz) |
84,863 |
78,127 |
95,897 |
83,765 |
96,474 |
0.6 |
15.2 |
342,652 |
355,104 |
3.6 |
AgE production (koz) |
12,454 |
12,898 |
14,874 |
13,549 |
14,572 |
-2.0 |
7.6 |
53,793 |
54,841 |
1.9 |
Silver sales (koz) |
5,225 |
6,369 |
5,758 |
7,156 |
7,292 |
26.6 |
1.9 |
24,508 |
24,644 |
0.6 |
Gold sales (oz) |
88,397 |
71,965 |
82,548 |
83,765 |
94,295 |
14.2 |
12.6 |
326,675 |
337,205 |
3.2 |
AgE sales (koz) |
11,412 |
11,625 |
12,024 |
13,549 |
14,488 |
20.5 |
6.9 |
48,619 |
49,519 |
1.9 |
Avg realised Ag price (US$/oz) |
17.45 |
17.09 |
16.87 |
16.72 |
16.75 |
-0.7 |
0.2 |
17.00 |
17.01 |
0.1 |
Avg realised Au price (US$/oz) |
1,208 |
1,263 |
1,283 |
1,276 |
1,277 |
-0.5 |
0.1 |
1,256 |
1,257 |
0.1 |
Avg realised AgE price (US$/oz) |
17.35 |
17.18 |
16.89 |
16.72 |
16.74 |
-0.9 |
0.1 |
17.01 |
17.03 |
0.1 |
Avg Ag cash cost (US$/oz) |
4.54 |
4.51 |
4.43 |
4.51 |
4.48 |
1.1 |
-0.7 |
4.50 |
4.49 |
-0.2 |
Avg Au cash cost (US$/oz) |
391 |
393 |
396 |
395 |
399 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
394 |
395 |
0.3 |
Avg AgE cash cost (US$/oz) |
5.11 |
4.90 |
4.84 |
4.82 |
4.85 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
4.91 |
4.92 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
197,951 |
199,684 |
203,034 |
226,540 |
242,547 |
19.5 |
7.1 |
827,209 |
843,215 |
1.9 |
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales, excluding depletion |
58,291 |
56,981 |
58,234 |
65,365 |
70,295 |
20.7 |
7.5 |
238,871 |
243,801 |
2.1 |
Depletion |
63,943 |
59,772 |
61,852 |
68,924 |
76,813 |
24.2 |
11.4 |
254,491 |
262,380 |
3.1 |
Total cost of sales |
122,234 |
116,753 |
120,086 |
134,289 |
147,108 |
22.5 |
9.5 |
493,362 |
506,181 |
2.6 |
Earnings from operations |
75,717 |
82,931 |
82,948 |
92,251 |
95,439 |
15.1 |
3.5 |
333,846 |
337,034 |
1.0 |
Expenses and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- General and administrative***** |
7,898 |
9,069 |
8,793 |
8,500 |
8,913 |
1.4 |
4.9 |
34,260 |
34,673 |
1.2 |
- Foreign exchange (gain)/loss |
|
41 |
163 |
0 |
66 |
-59.5 |
N/A |
204 |
270 |
32.4 |
- Net interest paid/(received) |
6,373 |
6,482 |
6,360 |
5,686 |
5,778 |
-9.2 |
1.6 |
24,901 |
24,993 |
0.4 |
- Other (income)/expense |
94 |
283 |
1,317 |
0 |
(10,093) |
-866.4 |
N/A |
1,694 |
(8,399) |
-595.8 |
Total expenses and other income |
14,365 |
15,875 |
16,633 |
14,186 |
4,664 |
-72.0 |
-67.1 |
61,059 |
51,537 |
-15.6 |
Earnings before income taxes |
61,352 |
67,056 |
66,315 |
78,065 |
90,775 |
36.9 |
16.3 |
272,788 |
285,497 |
4.7 |
Income tax expense/(recovery) |
128 |
(556) |
(263) |
0 |
(195) |
-25.9 |
N/A |
(691) |
-886 |
28.2 |
Marginal tax rate (%) |
0.2 |
(0.8) |
(0.4) |
0.0 |
(0.2) |
-50.0 |
N/A |
(0.3) |
-0.3 |
0.0 |
Net earnings |
61,224 |
67,612 |
66,578 |
78,065 |
90,970 |
36.6 |
16.5 |
273,479 |
286,383 |
4.7 |
Avg no. shares in issue (000s) |
441,484 |
441,784 |
442,094 |
442,094 |
442,469 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
441,864 |
441,961 |
0.0 |
Basic EPS (US$) |
0.14 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
40.0 |
16.7 |
0.62 |
0.65 |
4.8 |
Diluted EPS (US$) |
0.14 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
40.0 |
16.7 |
0.62 |
0.65 |
4.8 |
Source: Wheaton Precious Metals, Edison Investment Research. Note: *As reported, excluding impairments; **Q417 vs Q317; ***Q417 actual vs Q417 estimate; ****FY17 actual vs FY17 estimate; *****Quarterly forecasts exclude stock-based compensation costs.
From an operational perspective, key features of the quarter were strong production performances at Salobo and Penasquito, which both performed above our expectations, and positive sales performances from Penasquito and Sudbury. Combined, these more than offset a slightly less dynamic performance at WPM’s ‘other’ gold assets, reflecting, in particular, reduced production at Minto owing to lower grades on account of mine sequencing as part of an extended mine plan.
■
The Salobo plant continued to operate above nameplate capacity for a second consecutive quarter (largely on account of management initiatives, rather than ore characteristics), which resulted in the record quarterly production of copper concentrate and acted to mitigate otherwise lower grades and recovery.
■
At Penasquito, by contrast, higher grades and recoveries were complemented by increased throughput as a result of the implementation of a new management operating system and the better delivery of ore to the primary crusher.
■
Constancia was similarly affected by lower grade ore (as expected), albeit partially offset by higher throughput and recovery.
■
Finally, extended unscheduled maintenance at the Coleman mine resulted in lower throughput at Sudbury, partially offset by higher grades and recovery.
In the longer term, the Pyrite Leach Project at Penasquito (which will add c 1Moz gold and 44Moz silver over the current life of the mine, by recovering 40% Au and 48% Ag currently reporting to the tailings) is reported to be 62% complete (vs 40% at the end of Q317) and is expected to commence commissioning three months ahead of schedule, in Q418.
On 18 January, Barrick (the operator of Pascua-Lama) reported that it had received a revised resolution from Chile’s environmental regulator, SMA, requiring it to close its existing infrastructure on the Chilean side of the border. Barrick went on to say that the revised resolution does not affect its ongoing evaluation of an underground, block-caving operation at the mine, which would anyway require additional permitting and regulatory approvals in both Chile and Argentina and are unconnected to SMA’s decision. Nevertheless, in the light of the order to close surface facilities, Barrick has reclassified Pascua-Lama’s proven and probable mineral reserves of c 14Moz Au (based on an open-pit plan) as measured and indicated resources instead. As a result, WPM has similarly reclassified 151.7Moz of proven and probable silver reserves as measured and indicated resources, which it has interpreted as an ‘indicator of impairment’ in the sum of US$229m (from US$485m to US$256m).
Note that if the requirements of the Pascua-Lama completion test have not been satisfied by the deadline of 30 June 2020, WPM has the right to terminate its Pascua-Lama silver purchase agreement with Barrick, in which case it would be entitled to the return of its upfront cash payment of US$625m less cashflows received relative to the Lagunas Norte, Veladero and Pierina mines in the meantime – a figure that would have been US$261m as at 31 December 2017 (WPM figure) and we estimate is likely to be in the order of US$255m in 2020.