FY17 results: Progress across the business
In the year to end-September, Numis recorded good growth across its business with overall revenues up 16%. Revenues for both Equities and Corporate Broking and Advisory were at record levels. Pre-tax profits and earnings per share were 17% ahead. The corporate client list now stands at just over 200. Key points were as follows with comparisons against FY16:
■
Revenue increased by 16% to £130.1m.
■
Staff costs rose 17% to £69m, reflecting variable compensation and a 3% increase in the average headcount to 220, while the year-end figure stood at 235 (see Exhibit 1). This reflected selective investment to strengthen capabilities across the company. The compensation ratio for the year was little changed at 53.0% versus 52.4%.
■
Other costs increased by less than 7% and nudged down one point to 19% as a ratio of revenues, leaving the overall cost/income ratio at 71%. As shown in Exhibit 2, these ratios have been broadly stable since FY13.
■
Other operating income (net gains on the strategic investment portfolio) was £3.4m versus £3.8m. Most of the gain this year arose from price movements on quoted holdings, which account for half of the portfolio (largely through the Numis mid-cap fund).
■
Pre-tax profit increased by 18% to £38.1m or, excluding the portfolio gains, by 21% to £34.9m.
■
Earnings per share increased by 16.6% to 27.4p or, on a diluted basis, by 15.6% to 25.9p.
■
The full-year dividend of 12.0p was unchanged and Numis indicates that it has adopted a new stance on dividends and share buybacks (see below).
■
The balance sheet remains strong, with cash increasing from £89.0m to £95.9m after spending £22.9m on share repurchases. There is an estimated regulatory capital surplus of £67m.
■
The number of corporate clients increased by a net 3 to end the year at 202.
■
Equity capital raised for clients was £2.5bn, compared with £1.9bn (+33%), and the 45 equity raisings included 7 IPOs. The Corporate Broking and Advisory business also carried out 37 pure advisory roles, and 17 block trades and sell-downs, with a total value of £0.9m.
■
Numis’s UK equity capital markets share (by calendar year) has risen from 2.6% in 2013 and 9.8% in 2016 to 9.9% at the end of November this year (sources: Numis, Bloomberg).
Exhibit 1: Revenue per head and headcount
|
Exhibit 2: Cost to revenue ratios
|
|
|
Source: Numis, Edison Investment Research
|
Source: Numis, Edison Investment Research
|
Exhibit 1: Revenue per head and headcount
|
|
Source: Numis, Edison Investment Research
|
Exhibit 2: Cost to revenue ratios
|
|
Source: Numis, Edison Investment Research
|
Exhibit 3 shows the segmental composition of revenue for FY17. Compared with the average for the previous five years, there are two changes: the contribution from institutional commissions is 27% compared with 33%, while placing commissions have risen from 37% to 44%. The changes reflect the particularly strong performance in corporate finance activity as the Numis franchise has expanded over the six years concerned.
Franchise development is further illustrated in Exhibit 4, which shows the progression of total revenues for Numis and the aggregate market capital of its clients. The growth in aggregate market capital reflects both the growth in client numbers and an upward trend in the average market capital, which now stands at £726m, up 28% on the prior year. The development in corporate client base feeds into each of the business areas to a greater or lesser extent. Although the increased scale within the client base is valuable for revenue generation, Numis underlines its continuing commitment to the small cap area, which remains an area of strength for the business. This is reflected in the level of median market capital for its clients that, at £322m, is less than half the average figure.
Exhibit 3: Revenue analysis FY17
|
Exhibit 4: Revenue versus client market capital
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 3: Revenue analysis FY17
|
|
|
Exhibit 4: Revenue versus client market capital
|
|
|
Exhibit 5 shows the development of segmental revenues over the past five years. FY17 trading income showed further strong progress (+39% versus FY16) after a marked step-up in FY16. Numis indicates that the FY17 result was achieved with only a limited increase in capital usage. While institutional commission rates remained under pressure in the run up to MiFID, commission income was up 12%, which can be seen as a reflection of a relatively favourable market background in terms of market levels, a contribution from block trades (on the buyer side) and the strength of the Numis institutional franchise.
Corporate retainers, which we see as a relatively sticky source of income, grew by 20%, reflecting a 5% rise in the average corporate client count together with the benefit of progressive fee increases. The level of advisory fees was stable, but taking pure M&A advisory activity within this (excluding some fees related to capital raisings) the increase would have been 16%.
Exhibit 5: Revenue analysis
£m |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Change FY17/FY16 |
Net trading gains |
8.5 |
7.7 |
4.1 |
6.5 |
9.0 |
39% |
Institutional commissions |
28.8 |
31.9 |
29.3 |
31.9 |
35.8 |
12% |
Net Institutional Income |
37.2 |
39.6 |
33.4 |
38.4 |
44.8 |
17% |
Corporate retainers |
6.9 |
7.8 |
8.9 |
9.6 |
11.6 |
20% |
Advisory fees |
6.0 |
9.0 |
17.9 |
16.3 |
16.5 |
1% |
Placing commissions |
27.5 |
36.5 |
37.7 |
48.0 |
57.2 |
19% |
Corporate related |
40.4 |
53.3 |
64.6 |
73.9 |
85.3 |
15% |
Total revenue |
77.7 |
92.9 |
98.0 |
112.3 |
130.1 |
16% |
Dividend and share buyback policy
Numis has indicated an adjustment in its dividend and share buyback policy. Under this, the aim is to pay a stable ordinary dividend (unchanged at 12p for FY17) with consideration given to investing in the business platform, investing in selective growth opportunities and returning surplus cash to shareholders, subject to liquidity and capital requirements and market conditions. The group intends to buy back shares over the medium term to at least offset any prospective dilution from unvested share awards and potentially to reduce the share count further in order to enhance shareholder returns.