PANTAFLIX: A VOD platform targeting a global niche
The original concept for PANTAFLIX was put together in 2014, when demand was identified for people away from their home market wanting to watch content culturally familiar and in their native language – a need largely unmet by the existing video streaming platforms such as those from Netflix, Amazon Prime and Hulu VOD channels. The platform does not aim to compete directly with these global majors. Its target users would typically be migrants or expatriates, multilingual individuals or those interested in foreign films. While in any one individual market, this may not represent a significant audience, the platform is global and consequently the target market is the world’s 216 million expat and migrant populations (source: World Bank 2016), equivalent to 12% of OECD populations (source: OECD) including an estimated 50 million Chinese, four million Germans, 55 million Hispanics, four million Turks and 11 million Indians.
PANTAFLIX, though, should be regarded as a content platform rather than as an updated version of a broadcaster. The intention is not to purchase or to generate own content, but to facilitate the connection between content providers and consumers. In contrast to the vast majority of on-demand video platforms, PANTAFLIX has chosen to operate on a pay-per-view basis. This means that customers can view and pay for only the content that they want, representing a cheaper alternative to the aforementioned offerings. This means that the approach to marketing will be much more akin to a retail model, with no minimum guarantees built into the contractual rights. This is a particularly attractive model for independent content producers and providers that might struggle to achieve the discoverability that they (and their products) deserve on the major global VOD channels.
There is a significant amount of local language content that (like Pantaleon’s productions) may be hits at home, but is not considered commercial to market internationally alongside existing distribution channels; distributors and international sales houses tend to buy bundles of rights to distribute on a geographical basis and therefore some content is never aired beyond the local market. According to management, only 10% of films are distributed outside their home market. The model depends on the rights’ owners knowing where they have already sold the rights and seeking to access additional markets in a low-cost, low-maintenance manner. Therefore, the platform also seeks to ‘cut out the middle man’ by enabling rights holders to upload their films directly to the platform, select the countries that they wish to distribute in and, importantly, the relevant wholesale price they wish to charge. In return, they get to retain a larger share of revenues, as there is no ‘cut’ to be taken by distributors or content aggregators. PANTAFLIX takes c 25% of each download fee vs the 40-60% typically taken by more traditional routes to market, although it is not having to cover marketing costs out of its percentage.
In common with other video platforms, the success of PANTAFLIX will to a large extent be dependent on the size and quality of the content catalogue, where the content can be accessed, and the ease of navigation through the site. Management is targeting 300,000 films in its library by 2019. To put this in context, Netflix currently offers around 4,400 films and TV programmes in the UK; Amazon Prime offers 15,000 films and TV programmes in the UK. While the PANTAFLIX brand itself is not going to be actively promoted, users will be drawn to the platform through seeking out titles, with ‘halo’ effect marketing and a database performance-based, targeted approach to promotion that will build with increased use.
Having identified suitable launch partners, the initial development has been on a web-based model with mobile and app-based delivery following on. Android and iOS apps were launched in H117, and management expects roll-out of Smart TV offerings in H217. There need to be as few barriers as possible between the consumer looking for the content and being able to view it. The public launch was in December 2016 with the first phase territories being the US and across Europe, and parts of South-East Asia including Indonesia, Japan and the Philippines.
JV with Bruno Wu’s Sun Seven Stars Entertainment
As indicated above, the Chinese expatriate community is a particularly attractive demographic, both from a scale perspective and in terms of disposable income. In May 2017, PANTAFLIX announced a new joint venture, of which it will own 50%, with two related partners owning the other half. Sun Seven Stars Entertainment and Media Group is a significant private media industry player and investor in the Chinese market, with additional interests globally. Its revenues are undisclosed, but are reported to be in ‘multiple $bn’. It is majority-owned and controlled by Bruno Wu, its founder, co-chairman and CEO. It will hold 10% of the JV through its Red Rock Capital finance arm. 40% will be owned by Wecast Network (NASDAQ: WCST), which is focused on ‘BASE’ or blockchain, artificial intelligence, supply chain and exchanges. Wecast is chaired by Bruno Wu.
The JV will therefore use the extensive content resource of Sun Seven Stars, sophisticated technological input from Wecast and PANTAFLIX’s platform engineering and route to market. PANTAFLIX will gain access to a broad range of Chinese movies enhancing the platform’s global content library by up to 100,000 additional movies (Chinese home market content as well as US blockbuster content in Mandarin).
The global VOD market is estimated to be worth $17.9bn in FY17 (source: Statista), with forecast CAGR of 7.5% through to 2021. Within these figures, the US represents c $9.5bn, Europe $3.5bn and China $1bn. Streaming (SVoD) is the largest segment, representing around 62% of the total market value. The Chinese market lags; only 2.6% of internet users in China currently use VoD, (SVoD $0.9bn, TVoD $0.1bn) due to lower pricing, piracy and lack of comprehensive offers; however, growth rates are forecast to be high (22% CAGR to 2021), with penetration rising to 8.8% by that time.
While we are not aware of directly competing platforms, it is not to say there is no competition. In large markets cable or pay TV services offer international TV channels or packages designed for international customers (for instance Mandarin Direct from AT&T), and specific local language IPTV services are also available in a number of markets (eg KyLinTV – Chinese HD channels and 30,000 hours of VOD programmes; yupptv – Indian channels available globally). Furthermore, in some markets local language channels may already have been launched to meet this demand; in the US for instance, Spanish language channels are among the most watched nationally (Univision, MundoFox, Telemundo).
What differentiates Pantaleon’s strategy is that it is transactional, it is not providing access to TV channels but filmed content and it targets multiple languages.
Nasdaq-listed Eros provides a supportive reference demonstrating the demand for foreign language content outside home markets, focused on Indian language film production and distribution. In 2012, Eros also launched its own OTT platform ‘Eros now’ (c 5,000 titles, c 250,000 audio tracks). It now has over two million paid subscribers worldwide.
However, the industry as a whole faces challenges from piracy, as it has become increasingly easy for less conscientious members of the public to access to video content illegally, despite regulatory efforts. Furthermore, the majority of the content hosted on PANTAFLIX to date is not licensed solely to Pantaleon, but can also be found on rival platforms for similar fees, both on subscription and pay-per-view bases (eg Vimeo Plus [VHX], BIGFlix, JustWatch). Management’s view, which is borne out to an extent by other SVOD platforms (where much of the content can also be pirated), is that users are willing to pay for quality, seamless streaming and a safe online environment. The more niche nature of much of the content compared with the overall global catalogue and the likely greater proportion of views of back catalogue may also provide some natural protection.