Pacific Edge: A suite of tests for bladder cancer
Pacific Edge develops and commercialises molecular tests for the detection and better management of urothelial cancers (UC). The company has created a franchise of products that can be commercialised through the same channels under the Cxbladder banner to meet a series of unmet needs along the same clinical pathway. The underlying aims are to meet the clinical needs of urologists, notably a reduction in the number of current, repetitive and invasive diagnostic tests and procedures for UC, and an improvement in accuracy over those tests currently in the market.
A one-stop shop to detect and manage bladder cancer
Pacific Edge’s Cxbladder products are regulated in the US as laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) that can be used for detecting bladder cancer in patients who present with hematuria in conjunction with standard urological work-up, a patient population of around seven million annually in the US. The Cxbladder technology is gene based and can be used as a non-invasive adjunct to cystoscopy or to replace other urine-based tests to identify more accurately those patients who can be removed from requiring a full clinical workup for UC and for the better and faster identification of patients who should go on for more invasive testing. In New Zealand, Cxbladder has replaced the use of cystoscopy in all patients with hematuria being evaluated for UC. It is more accurate, faster, less invasive and more cost-effective than the existing tests and procedures that include cytology, NMP22 BladderChek (Abbott through the acquisition of Alere), NMP22 ELISA (Fisher Scientific) and UroVysion FISH (Abbott). Cxbladder Detect quantitatively measures the expression of five mRNA biomarkers in a small sample of the patient’s urine that has been collected non-invasively. Pacific Edge has developed a set of algorithms that combine cancer biomarkers into a single score to detect and characterise bladder cancer. The urine sample is evaluated and tested using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction validation, a process that amplifies a small RNA sample. This system indicates a score-based probability of urothelial carcinoma: 0–0.12 normal; 0.12–0.23 elevated; and 0.23–1.0 high based on gene expression.
Its second product, Cxbladder Triage, was first launched in New Zealand in December 2014 and targets physicians in the primary and secondary care of patients who present with hematuria in New Zealand and Australia and urologists in the United States. Cxbladder Triage includes the same five genomic biomarkers as Cxbladder Detect adding four phenotypic variables to give a new algorithm. Cxbladder Triage is used to rule out cancer using its high sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Follow on tests Cxbladder Monitor and Cxbladder Resolve are aimed at different value propositions in the evaluation and monitoring of UCs detailed below.
Exhibit 1: Summary of the Cxbladder pipeline
Product name |
Function |
Status |
Notes |
Cxbladder Detect |
Detects bladder cancer in patients with hematuria. |
Commercially available in NZ, Australia and the US since 2013. |
Non-invasive laboratory test for the detection of bladder cancer. Adjunct to cystoscopy. |
Cxbladder Triage |
Segregates patients without bladder cancer. |
Commercially available in NZ (2014), Australia and the US (2015). |
High sensitivity and high negative predictive value. |
Cxbladder Resolve |
Classifies tumours as low or high grade. |
Launched in New Zealand (2016) with US roll-out upcoming. |
Prognostic test with sensitivity and high specificity to patients with high-grade and late-stage disease. |
Cxbladder Monitor |
Ongoing monitoring to check for recurrence of bladder cancer. |
Commercially available in NZ (2015) and the US (2016). |
High sensitivity and high negative predictive value to determine patients who should receive follow-up tests. |
Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men in the US according to the National Cancer Institute and has the highest per patient medical cost of any cancer. There will be an estimated 80,470 new cases diagnosed in the US in 2019. Patients who present with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer experience high recurrence rates of 15–61% and 31–78% after one and five years, respectively.
Cxbladder Detect is clinically validated by a multicentre clinical study in 485 patients in Australasia, which compared the test to the benchmark urine tests. Pacific Edge has also completed a further blinded user study in 178 patients, which showed an equivalent rate of performance. Voided urine samples were analysed using Cxbladder, NMP22 ELISA and NMP22 BladderChek, and urine cytology and sensitivity (true positives) and specificity (true negatives) compared to cystoscopy as a reference.
Exhibit 2: Sensitivity of urine detection tests in multicentre clinical study of 485 patients
Tumour stage |
Cxbladderdetect |
Cytology |
NMP22 BladderChek |
NMP22 ELISA |
Tis |
100% |
100% |
0% |
0% |
Ta |
68% |
35% |
38% |
35% |
T1 |
100% |
69% |
50% |
75% |
T2 |
100% |
100% |
22% |
67% |
T3 |
100% |
100% |
50% |
100% |
High grade tumours |
97% |
83% |
38% |
69% |
Upper tract tumours |
100% |
50% |
0% |
75% |
Overall sensitivity |
82% |
56% |
38% |
50% |
Specificity |
85% |
96% |
96% |
88% |
Source: Pacific Edge trial published in Journal of Urology, Vol 188, 741–747
The study showed Cxbladder Detect to be more accurate than cytology and NMP22 tests across all stages and grades at a pre-specified specificity of 85% including stage Ta, which is a potential advantage given the low sensitivity of other tests for early-stage bladder cancer. Furthermore, Cxbladder Detect identified five UCs that had not been diagnosed by cystoscopy, but were subsequently confirmed in a 12-month follow-up. The results were published in the International Journal of Urology in September 2012.
Cxbladder Detect also compares favourably against Abbott’s UroVysion looking at separate large-scale clinical trials, each with over 400 patients. By comparison, UroVysion was launched 2001 as an aid in monitoring bladder cancer and in 2005 to aid diagnosis, using Abbott’s FISH fluorescence technology to detect chromosomal abnormalities. In a trial conducted by Abbott, UroVysion showed an overall sensitivity of 68.6% and specificity of 77.7% in detecting bladder cancer in 479 patients presenting with hematuria. This compared with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 85% for Cxbladder Detect in the separate study detailed above. We note some caution must be used with the comparisons given tests were not compared head to head.
In 2017, Pacific Edge published two clinical studies evaluating Cxbladder Monitor. Cxbladder Monitor for UC recurrence has been internally clinically validated by a multicentre US study, which analysed 1,036 voided urine samples from 763 patients undergoing routine surveillance, including cystoscopy, from October 2012 to November 2015. The independent clinical validation of Cxbladder Monitor showed a validated sensitivity of 93%, a negative predictive value (NPV; true negative) of 97%, and a test negative rate of 34%. For all high-grade disease and low-grade stage T1 or greater, sensitivity was 95%, while sensitivity was 85% for low-grade Ta disease. Furthermore, of the 1,036 individual samples used in the development and validation of Cxbladder Monitor, 1,016 samples (from 748 patients) collected were used for clinical comparison to non-invasive tests that include cytology, NMP22 ELISA (Fischer Scientific), and NMP22 BladderChek (Abbott) for ruling out recurrent UC. The study showed Cxbladder Monitor to be more accurate than cytology and NMP22 tests across all stages and grades as demonstrated by high sensitivity and high NPV, both metrics essential to an effective rule-out test.
Exhibit 3: Sensitivity of urine detection tests in multicentre study of 748 patients
Tumour stage |
Cxbladder Monitor |
Cytology |
NMP22 ELISA |
NMP22 BladderChek |
Ta |
89% |
16% |
21% |
5% |
Tis |
97% |
31% |
41% |
31% |
≥T1 |
100% |
26% |
32% |
11% |
High grade tumours |
97% |
23% |
29% |
14% |
Low grade tumours |
84% |
13% |
20% |
4% |
Overall sensitivity |
91% |
22% |
26% |
11% |
Source: Pacific Edge trial published in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, Vol 35, 531.e15- 531.e22
Additionally, Abbott’s UroVysion FISH was performed on 145 samples because of either atypical local cytology, physician request, or performed independently of cytology analysis. UroVysion FISH demonstrated a sensitivity of 33% and an NPV of 92%, consecutive cytology and UroVysion FISH yielded a sensitivity of 38% and an NPV 93%, in comparison to Cxbladder Monitor, which showed a sensitivity and NPV of 93% and 98%, respectively. However, the UroVysion FISH test was not part of the principal pathologic review and the data was obtained from a comparatively low sample size.
There are a number of commercially available in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests to detect and monitor bladder cancer in hematuria patients, although the specificity and sensitivity of such tests is variable. NMP22 has been widely adopted as an adjunct to cytology. However, no other test is being used as standard, and until Cxbladder, none has been shown to be more accurate than the existing benchmark. Hence, many of the commercially available IVD tests are not used by mainstream urology practices.
Exhibit 4: Landscape of approved IVD tests to detect and monitor bladder cancer with hematuria
Test/distributor |
Methodology |
Advantages |
Limitations |
Notes |
UroVysion/Abbott |
FISH fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay – detects chromosomal abnormalities. |
Higher sensitivity than cytology across all stages and grades. |
Requires a large specimen sample. Poor positive predictive value. |
Detects bladder cancer in voided urine sample in cases of gross and micro hematuria and in patients with a history of bladder cancer. |
NMP22 ELISA |
Measures levels of protein NMP22, which is elevated in bladder cancer sufferers. |
Higher sensitivity than cytology for grade I/II. |
Low specificity – interference from benign urinary tract conditions. |
Has not been adopted for standard use in urologic work-up. |
NMP22 BladderChek |
Point-of-care (POC) test with 30-minute turnaround. |
Improves detection vs cytology in cases of recurrent cancer. |
Relatively high rate of false positives. |
Improves accuracy in combination with cystoscopy, but will not replace it. |
BTA Stat/Polymedco |
POC, detects human complement factor H-related protein. |
Immediate result. |
High rate of false positive results in cases of co-existing genitourinary conditions. |
FDA approved for monitoring bladder cancer in conjunction with cystoscopy. |
BTA Trak/Polymedco |
Lab-based immunoassay. |
Higher sensitivity than cytology for low-grade tumours. |
High rate of false positive results in cases of co-existing genitourinary conditions. |
Used for monitoring rather than for diagnosis – high rate of false positives. |
ImmunoCyt |
Lab-based immunofluorescence assay. |
Relatively high sensitivity in some patient groups. |
High rate of false positive results in cases of co-existing genitourinary conditions. |
Approved for monitoring bladder cancer in conjunction with cystoscopy. |
UBC/IDL Biotech |
Measures soluble fragments of cytokeratins 8 and 18. Cytokeratins are characteristic of epithelial cells. |
More accurate at detecting CIS than cytology. |
Overall performance not superior to cytology. Ongoing testing. |
Available as UBC ELISA (2 hr test) and UBC IRMA (POC). |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Of the other diagnostic tests currently in development for detecting and monitoring UCs, all are in early stages of development, and none, as yet, has shown equivalent or better overall accuracy. Given the long lead time for the commercialisation of UC tests, which can span a number of years, we believe that Pacific Edge has a considerable leg-up on would-be competitors.
The Cxbladder portfolio is being developed as laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). The CMS regulates clinical laboratories that carry out diagnostic testing through the authority of CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments), which establishes quality standards for clinical lab testing and a certification programme for labs that perform testing using IVD devices. The company has also received the College of American Pathologists (CAP) signification approval in the US. Pacific Edge management continues to explore the pathway to full FDA approval for the Cxbladder portfolio, which would enable the company to directly market to consumers. However, CLIA certification is sufficient for direct selling to physicians given the tests are processed in the company’s own lab.
Pacific Edge management intends to focus on bladder cancer diagnostics in the short to medium term. Further out, the company may pursue other portfolio opportunities that include gastric, colorectal and endometrial cancers and melanoma. However, the company plans to first concentrate on building on the current momentum of the Cxbladder products and franchise in targeted global markets.