In qualitative terms, the principal risks to which the Ilovica project is immediately exposed include geographical/sovereign risk, geological risk, metallurgical risk, engineering risk, financing risk and management risk. In general terms, these may be summarised as execution risk – ie management’s ability to bring the project to account within its geographical jurisdiction and the required technical parameters. Once in production however, these risks will be perceived to have reduced and other risks, such as commercial, commodity price, foreign exchange and global economic risks will become relatively more significant. In the meantime however, a number of circumstances mitigate the initial risks identified.
■
In geological terms, the porphyritic nature of Ilovica means that, despite the grades being relatively low, there is a high degree of continuity in the ore-body, such that high volume, low cost, bulk mining techniques can be used with confidence and with reduced risk of dilution. Note that this also mitigates engineering risk to some extent. Geological risk mitigation also exists in the form of the relatively close-spaced drilling performed by Euromax at Ilovica, which is as close as 50m x 50m in some areas (also reflected in the fact that a high proportion of the resource is in the measured category and a high proportion of the reserve is in the proven category).
■
Metallurgical risk is mitigated by the fact that there are consecutive flotation and cyanidation steps to the process route. While the process flow route is designed to treat sulphide ore therefore, the majority of gold from oxide ore should also be recoverable. By extension, the majority of gold from transitional ore should also therefore be recoverable plus some copper – although the exact recoverability of copper from the transitional ore (within the range 0% to 84% remains uncertain at this time). Further risk mitigation also exists in the fact that less than 8% of the total resource (by tonnage) is in the form of oxide material and reserves are exclusively composed of sulphide material and high (copper) grade transitional material only.
■
The Ilovica site exhibits steep longitudinal gradients and steep crossfalls, which affects the design of roads, terraces and other features that require earthworks. However, engineering risk is mitigated by the fact that a geotechnical site investigation has already been managed by Amec Foster Wheeler and that plant and other terraces have been designed to South African standards to best fit in with the topography and their functional requirements.
■
Management risk is mitigated by the fact that six of the 12 of Euromax’s board and senior management (namely Messrs Koenig, Sharpe, Gokool, Forward, Morgan-Wynne and Baker) are alumni of European Goldfields and therefore have experience in developing mines in the region (eg Stratoni and Skouries).
■
In terms of sovereign/geographical risk, Macedonia does not appear in the Fraser Institute’s survey and ranking of investment attractiveness. While near neighbour Greece fares relatively poorly in the survey, this can probably be reasonably attributed to its specific travails within the European Union currently. In the meantime, other near neighbours Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia and Turkey all rank towards the middle of the range of investment attractiveness (see Exhibit 12), while EOX management confirms that the Macedonian government has always proved amenable to work with, both on account of its desire to be accepted into the European Union, the scale of the Ilovica project relative to the national economy and also the fact that many government ministers are former émigrés, returning after two or three generations, having been educated in the West.
Exhibit 12: Fraser Institute 2015 survey of Investment Attractiveness (Macedonia near neighbours highlighted)
|
|
|
From a quantitative perspective meanwhile, variations in Euromax’s discounted dividend NPV with metals prices, costs, the discount rate and foreign exchange rates, respectively, are shown in the tables below.
Exhibit 13: Euromax discounted dividend NPV sensitivity to metals prices (C$/share)
Metals prices change |
Spot price* |
-10% |
Base case |
+10% |
NPV (C$/share) |
0.24 |
0.67 |
1.08 |
1.50 |
Percent change in NPV (%) |
-77.8 |
-38.0 |
N/A |
+38.9 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *US$1,243/oz Au, US$4,941/t Cu & US$15.86/oz Ag.
Note that the current copper price is currently 24.3% below our long-term copper price.
Exhibit 14: Euromax discounted dividend NPV sensitivity to unit costs (C$/share)
Unit costs change |
+10% |
Base case |
-10% |
NPV (C$/share) |
0.88 |
1.08 |
1.29 |
Percent change in NPV (%) |
-18.5 |
N/A |
+19.4 |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Exhibit 15: Euromax discounted dividend NPV at varying discount rates (C$/share)
Discount rate (%) |
0% |
10% |
20% |
30% |
NPV (C$/share) |
3.09 |
1.08 |
0.47 |
0.23 |
Source: Edison Investment Research
With respect to foreign exchange rates, the relationship between the Canadian dollar and the US dollar is merely one of conversion, whereas the relationship between the euro and the US dollar has a direct causative effect on margins (costs typically being denominated in euros, whereas revenues are denominated in US dollars) and is therefore significantly larger in terms of its effect:
Exhibit 16: Euromax discounted dividend NPV at varying €/US$ rates (C$/share)
€/US$ rate |
1.0031 |
1.1146 |
1.2261 |
Change (%) |
-10.0 |
0.0 |
+10.0 |
NPV (C$/share) |
1.42 |
1.08 |
0.76 |
Percent change in NPV (%) |
+31.5 |
N/A |
-29.6 |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Exhibit 17: Euromax discounted dividend NPV at varying C$/US$ rates (C$/share)
C$/US$ rate |
1.1890 |
1.3211 |
1.4532 |
Change (%) |
-10.0 |
0.0 |
+10.0 |
NPV (C$/share) |
1.03 |
1.08 |
1.13 |
Percent change in NPV (%) |
-4.6 |
N/A |
+4.6 |
Source: Edison Investment Research