We maintain our valuation approach, which includes a DCF model for the services business and separate risk-adjusted NPV models for the R&D programmes. For Evotec’s drug discovery business, we use a DCF model with a cost of capital of 10%, a terminal growth rate of 2.5%, a long-term operating profit margin of c 25% achievable within the next 10 years and maintenance capex of around €10m. For our R&D pipeline valuation, we have made a number of changes to the projects to reflect recent developments and have decided to include preclinical stage projects, while previously we valued only those in the clinic. Evotec’s hybrid business model is focused on early stage research and is maturing with the expanding discovery and preclinical pipeline.
In its 2015 annual report, Evotec described an R&D pipeline with 28 projects (some of which have multiple compounds) ranging from discovery stage to clinical. Exhibit 7 demonstrates the rationale we employed in order to select which projects to include in our valuation. Early stage drug development can be broadly classified into discovery and preclinical stages. As a general rule, we assume that value should be assigned to those preclinical projects that are likely to move to clinical stage if the data from the ongoing studies is supportive. In our view, this corresponds to the preclinical stage when the project is already past the discovery stage, is being tested in in vivo studies and the data package for the initial new drug application is being accumulated.
Exhibit 7: Overview of the drug discovery process
|

|
Source: Edison Investment Research
|
With this in mind, we now include several of the preclinical stage projects, for which we believe there is enough information to make reasonable assumptions as to the development pathway. Given the substantial risk-adjustment commensurate with the early stage projects, especially in preclinical stage, there will be a natural turnover in the projects with some of them progressing forward, while other ones are terminated due to a variety of reasons. Exhibits 8 and 9 summarise our assumptions and the sum of the parts company valuation.
Exhibit 8: Assumption for R&D projects
Product |
Stage |
Indication/ partner |
Proba-bility |
Launch |
Peak sales*, $m (see note) |
Royalties/milestones** (see note) |
Status |
EVT201 |
Phase II |
Insomnia/ Jingxin Pharma |
30% |
2020 |
100 |
Undisclosed; we assume 15% royalties, which also includes milestone payments |
GABAA receptor modulator has shown efficacy in two Phase II trials with no serious or unexpected adverse events. Jingxin Pharma in-licensed the exclusive rights to the drug in China and is running a Phase II trial in China. |
EVT401 |
Phase II ready |
Rheumatoid arthritis, inflammation/ Conba Pharmaceutical |
30% |
2020 |
200 |
Milestones up to €60m + tiered double-digit royalties (15% assumed) |
Antagonist of P2X7 ATP-gated ion channel. Phase I trial demonstrated safety and tolerability. Conba Pharmaceutical in-licensed the exclusive rights to the drug in China and is preparing a Phase II trial. |
Two undisclosed projects |
Phase I |
Oncology/ Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche |
10% |
2021 |
Combined 1,500 |
Undisclosed; we assume 10% royalties including milestones, including milestone payments |
Boehringer Ingelheim initiated a Phase I trial with an oncology compound in September 2013, triggering a €2m payment to Evotec. No further details have been disclosed. |
EVT770 |
Preclinical |
Diabetes T 1/2/ MedImmune |
5% |
2022 |
500 |
Milestones up to €254m + royalties (we assume 7.5%) |
The project is aimed at regenerating pancreatic beta cells that produce insulin with preclinical proof-of-concept. In December 2010 Evotec entered into a licence and collaboration agreement with MedImmune (the biologics unit of AstraZeneca) to develop EVT770 in the field of diabetes. For peak sales we used historic sales of glipizide and glimepiride. |
Various |
Preclinical |
Endometriosis/ Bayer |
5% |
2020 |
310 |
Milestones up to €580m + double-digit royalties (we assume 10%) |
In October 2012 Evotec and Bayer entered into a five-year, multi-target collaboration with the goal of developing three clinical candidates for the treatment of endometriosis (we assume one project to be carried forward to the clinic). For peak sales we used consensus estimates of 2022 sales of Elagolix, Visanne, Dinagest, Lupron and Leuplin. |
Three undisclosed projects |
Preclinical |
Oncology/ Sanofi |
5% |
2023 |
Combined 2,250 |
Undisclosed; we assume 10%, including milestone payments |
Licensed from Sanofi after the Toulouse deal in 2015. Potentially first- and best-in-class compounds for oncology indications. Further details undisclosed. |
NdL platform |
Preclinical |
Multiple sclerosis/ Topas Therapeutics (spin-out) |
5% |
2023 |
3,000 |
Unpartnered; we assume out-licensing in clinical development with 15% royalties, including potential milestones payments |
Topas Therapeutics is a platform spinout from Evotec, which maintained a 40% economic interest in the company. Only one indication included in our model, although there is potential for expansion. For peak sales we used consensus estimates of 2022 sales of Tecfidera, Ocrevus, Tysabri, Aubagio and Copaxone. |
Undisclosed platform |
Preclinical |
Microbiome related diseases/ Second Genome |
5% |
2023 |
635 |
Undisclosed; we assume 15%, which includes potential milestones payments |
In March 2015 Evotec and Second Genome announced a collaboration in small molecule-based discovery and development activities for the treatment of microbiome-mediated diseases. Specific indications were not disclosed; we assume irritable bowel disease as a likely option. More indications are possible as Second Genome has a proprietary platform to identify and modulate microbiome-mediated pathways. For peak sales we used consensus estimates of 2022 sales of Xifaxan 550, Viberzi and Donnatal. |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Evotec, EvaluatePharma. Note: *Peak sales assumption is based on the average of reference drugs sales, where relevant, or on our best estimate. Historic peak sales of reference drugs used if available or consensus estimates from EvaluatePharma. **Where disclosed, we have used the licensing agreement details for NPV projects; if undisclosed, we have applied higher royalties than industry standard to account for the milestone payments.
The main changes compared to our previous valuation are:
■
Removal of EVT100, a selective NMDA-antagonist. The project was licensed to Janssen in 2012 and was being developed for depression. Janssen decided to discontinue the development and Evotec will regain the licence rights. While Evotec is assessing further business opportunities with this asset, due to lack of visibility we have removed EVT100 from our valuation.
■
Removal of Somatoprim, a novel somatostatin analogue for acromegaly. Originally owned by Aspireo Pharmaceuticals, the project was being developed in partnership with Evotec. Cortendo (now Strongbridge Biopharma) acquired all rights from Aspireo in 2015, while Evotec received an undisclosed one-time fee.
■
Addition of four preclinical stage projects, with the details and our assumptions summarised in Exhibit 8 (EVT770 was already included).
■
We have also reflected the most recent developments in the projects that we previously included in our valuation. Namely, we have postponed the EVT201 project by two years. The development of the Phase II stage asset by Evotec’s partner Jingxin Pharma has been somewhat slower than we expected. However, according to the latest update in 2015 annual report, the Phase II trial has been initiated, with patient recruitment well underway. Similarly, we have postponed the EVT401 project by two years and the two oncology projects with Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche by one year.
For the projects we have used industry standard assumptions. Probabilities to reach the market and timelines were selected according to the stage of the project. Royalty rates are assumed according to the stage of the project where milestone payments were disclosed. If undisclosed, then we increased the royalty rate to capture the milestones as well. We note that all the costs associated with the preclinical development of the assets are accounted for in the DCF valuation, while NPV calculations include only expected royalties and milestone payments from partners, which continue the clinical development (Evotec’s strategy is not to invest in clinical development). As a result, our calculated NPV values represent an upside associated with the assets.
Our Evotec valuation is marginally lower at €575m or €4.34/share, from €577m or €4.36/share previously. The lower net cash position and the removal of clinical stage projects were offset by the addition of the preclinical assets and slightly higher valuation of drug discovery services, mostly due to rolling our model forward in time. We note a significant risk adjustment, which is typical in early preclinical projects. If, for example, all programmes are a success, as per our model, the valuation would be €1.9bn or €14.4/share.
Exhibit 9: Evotec summary of risk-adjusted DCF valuation
|
Value (€m) |
Value/share (€) |
Probability |
Risk-adjusted value (€m) |
Risk-adjusted value/share (€) |
Drug alliance business |
388.1 |
2.93 |
100% |
388.1 |
2.93 |
Clinical stage R&D assets |
|
|
|
|
|
EVT201 |
17.2 |
0.13 |
30% |
5.2 |
0.04 |
EVT401 |
62.0 |
0.47 |
30% |
18.6 |
0.14 |
Undisclosed programmes |
187.5 |
1.41 |
10% |
18.8 |
0.14 |
Preclinical stage R&D assets |
|
|
|
|
|
EVT770 |
146.8 |
1.11 |
5% |
7.3 |
0.06 |
Endometriosis |
251.3 |
1.90 |
5% |
12.6 |
0.09 |
EVT801/701/601 |
223.8 |
1.69 |
5% |
11.2 |
0.08 |
Multiple sclerosis |
443.5 |
3.35 |
5% |
8.9 |
0.07 |
Microbiome |
93.9 |
0.71 |
5% |
4.7 |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash |
99.9 |
0.75 |
100% |
99.9 |
0.72 |
Total |
1,914.1 |
14.44 |
|
575.2 |
4.34 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: WACC = 10% for drug discovery business; WACC = 12.5% for product valuations.