Management’s strategy of growing the pipeline of new launches, increasing geographic reach to its hobbyists through more own-stores, trade accounts and increasing online distribution, and better leveraging of its IP has delivered impressive financial results since FY15. GAW has reported a core revenue CAGR of 18% and operating profit including licensing income of 34% from FY15–23.
Exhibit 6: Core revenue and total profitability
|
|
Source: Games Workshop Group accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *53 weeks.
|
Income statement: Revenue growth and operational gearing
In FY23, there was a notable step up in the year-on-year growth rate of GAW’s total revenue in the second half of the year, to c 20%, following a relatively slow start to the year with total revenue growth of c 7% in H123. This took the full year growth rate to 14%, and total revenue to c £471m from c £415m in FY22. On a constant currency basis, year-on-year revenue growth was c 8% for the full year, including no growth in H123.
Exhibit 7: Divisional revenue and profit
£m |
FY22 |
H123 |
H223 |
FY23 |
FY24e |
FY25e |
Total revenue |
414.8 |
226.6 |
244.2 |
470.8 |
495.8 |
518.4 |
Growth y-o-y (%) |
12.2 |
7.1 |
20.2 |
13.5 |
5.3 |
4.6 |
Core revenue |
386.8 |
212.3 |
233.1 |
445.4 |
469.1 |
490.5 |
Growth y-o-y (%) |
9.5 |
10.9 |
19.4 |
15.1 |
5.3 |
4.6 |
Licensing revenue |
28.0 |
14.3 |
11.1 |
25.4 |
26.7 |
28.0 |
Growth y-o-y (%) |
71.8 |
(28.9) |
40.5 |
(9.3) |
5.3 |
4.6 |
Total gross profit |
287.4 |
150.6 |
171.0 |
321.6 |
345.7 |
361.5 |
Gross margin (%) |
69.3 |
66.5 |
70.0 |
68.3 |
69.7 |
69.7 |
Core gross profit |
259.4 |
136.3 |
159.9 |
296.2 |
319.0 |
333.5 |
Gross margin (%) |
67.1 |
64.2 |
68.6 |
66.5 |
68.0 |
68.0 |
Licensing gross profit |
28.0 |
14.3 |
11.1 |
25.4 |
26.7 |
28.0 |
Gross margin (%) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Total operating profit |
157.1 |
83.6 |
86.6 |
170.2 |
185.6 |
192.6 |
Margin (%) |
37.9 |
36.9 |
35.5 |
36.2 |
37.4 |
37.2 |
Core operating profit |
131.7 |
70.7 |
77.5 |
148.2 |
162.1 |
168.0 |
Margin (%) |
34.0 |
33.3 |
33.2 |
33.3 |
34.6 |
34.3 |
Licensing operating profit |
25.4 |
12.9 |
9.1 |
22.0 |
23.5 |
24.6 |
Margin (%) |
90.7 |
90.2 |
82.0 |
86.6 |
88.0 |
88.0 |
Source: Games Workshop Group accounts, Edison Investment Research.
There were quite divergent trends between core and licensing revenue (see below). Core revenue increased by c 9% on a constant currency basis, and again there was a notable improvement towards the end of the year following H123’s growth of 3.4%. In descending order, core’s channels grew as follows: Retail (+11% y-o-y constant currency growth), Trade (+9%) and Online (+3%).
As can be seen above, GAW benefited from the weakness of sterling versus the US dollar, specifically with an average US$1.20/£ through FY23 versus US$1.34/£ in FY22. There was also modest sterling weakness of c 3% relative to other important trading currencies such as the euro and Australian dollar, while a weaker Japanese yen would have negatively affected revenue growth.
Pricing is typically a positive for GAW’s revenue growth; in FY23 the average recommended retail price on miniatures was 6% and an average of 3% across all other product lines. These compare with average increases of 3–4% in FY18–20.
Moving into FY24, we can see from Exhibit 8 that the launch of a new edition of the major properties has typically provided a strong boost to core revenue growth and profitability. In the year of the most recent launches of the new editions of 40K, core revenue grew by c 41% (FY18) and by c 34% (FY21). We should stress that these revenue growth figures were not solely due to the release of the new editions as new editions generate revenue over multiple years, but they were certainly very helpful. FY24 and future years should benefit from the June 2023 launch of the 10th edition of 40K, Leviathan. Also, FY21’s growth was likely to have been positively affected by the recovery from the outbreak of the COVID pandemic at the end of FY20, albeit the pandemic affected the recoveries of individual countries at different times through FY21 and beyond. The most recent launch has obviously been received very well, with GAW reporting core revenue growth of c 14% to £121m from £106m in Q124, above the board’s expectations.
Exhibit 8: Phasing of new editions
|
FY15 |
FY16 |
FY17 |
FY18* |
FY19 |
FY20 |
FY21 |
FY22 |
FY23 |
Property (edition) launch |
40K (7th) |
Sigmar (1st) |
|
40K (8th) |
Sigmar (2nd) |
|
40K (9th) |
Sigmar (3rd) |
|
Date of launch |
May 2014 |
July 2015 |
|
June 2017 |
June 2018 |
|
July 2020 |
June 2021 |
|
Core revenue growth y-o-y (constant currency) |
(0.3%) |
(0.8%) |
21.4% |
40.8% |
15.4% |
4.6% |
33.9% |
10.8% |
9.3% |
Core gross margin |
69.0% |
68.3% |
72.4% |
71.0% |
67.5% |
67.0% |
72.7% |
67.1% |
66.5% |
Gross margin change y-o-y (pp) |
(1.3%) |
(0.7%) |
4.1% |
(1.4%) |
(3.5%) |
(0.6%) |
5.8% |
(5.6%) |
(0.6%) |
Source: Games Workshop Group accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *53 weeks.
Against this, we would note that since the start of the FY24 financial year, sterling has strengthened against the US dollar, Australian dollar and Japanese yen by between 8–11% versus the average exchange rates in H123 and therefore would represent a headwind to GAW’s revenue and profit growth if sterling’s strength persists through the remainder of the year. For FY24 we forecast c 10% constant currency revenue growth, offset by a c 4% headwind from currency translation using year-to-date average exchange rates. The implied y-o-y revenue growth for the remaining nine months of FY24 of c 2% reflects some conservatism for growth against a tougher comparative from H223. For FY25 we forecast c 5% revenue growth.
In previous Outlook notes we have attempted to demonstrate the key drivers to changes in core’s gross margin, which has varied from c 67–73% since FY15. For FY23 management disclosed that a lower inventory provision and production efficiencies were helpful to the gross margin by a combined 170bp y-o-y, but that higher materials costs, logistics costs and new animations costs for Warhammer+ reduced core gross margin by a combined 230bp, such that the margin declined from 67.1% in FY22 to 66.5% in FY23. The easing of external cost pressures such as some input and logistics costs should be supportive of an improved core gross margin for FY24. We assume a modest increase in the core gross margin to c 68% in FY24 and FY25.
Over the long term, GAW has demonstrated high operational gearing as it has leveraged its semi-fixed operating cost base. As GAW is vertically integrated, determining profit by distribution channel is a little subjective given the necessary allocation of costs. Other factors that influence the gross and operating margin in any year include relative geographic growth rates and foreign exchange differences, the phasing of the launches of new editions of the key properties (we believe that 40K is larger than AoS) and other external operating costs pressures, such as input and freight pressures in 2022.
The core operating margin declined by 70bp y-o-y to 33.3% in FY23, mainly due to a year-on-year increase in staff costs on an absolute basis and relative to core revenue of 50bp to reward another year of strong performance and included further growth in the headcount (+4% y-o-y). Strong growth in operating profit over the long term has enabled the payments of a profit share and a discretionary annual bonus to staff to reward them for performance, a strong indication of the importance of staff loyalty and team culture. We assume a modest improvement in the core operating margin to 34.6% in FY24 and 34.3% in FY25, which includes some negative leverage of operating costs from a high sterling cost base relative to overseas revenues. The strong y-o-y revenue growth in Q124 translated to a significant increase in profit before tax to c £57m from £39m in Q123, an effective margin of 45% versus 36% in Q123. If we assume a similar margin on licensing revenue (see below) as in prior periods, we estimate that total operating costs for the core business were marginally down year-on-year in Q124. This was likely due to the positive operational gearing from better-than-expected volumes and lower freight costs versus the prior year, offsetting ongoing higher staff costs from growing headcount and inflationary pressures including the flow through from the increase in the National Living Wage.
Licensing: Leveraging the IP
Licensing income has become an important contributor to GAW’s growth in profitability, growing from £1.5m in FY15 to an all-time high of £28m in FY22 before reducing to £25.4m in FY23, as management has sought to extend use of the IP. There is no visibility on future licensing income as it depends on how quickly management becomes comfortable with potential partners and their use of the IP, and in turn how successfully the partners generate revenue. IFRS 15 (revenue from contracts with customers), which requires full recognition of guaranteed licensing income on signing the contract, exacerbates the lumpiness of the income. There is a mismatch between recognition of income in the income statement and the cash received over the life of the licence, leading to a variable debtor balance for licensing income. Licensing revenue fell by c 9% y-o-y in FY23 to £25.4m (FY22: £28m). The key driver of the decline was a reduction in the first-year guarantee income from multi-year contracts, which was significantly higher in FY22, £15m versus £4.3m in FY21 and £8.1m in FY23. The strength of GAW’s licensing partners is indicated by the increases in other income (ie non-minimum guarantees from £12m in FY21 to £13m in FY22 and £17.3m in FY23). The company reported a significant increase in licensing revenue in Q124 to £6m from £3m in Q123, albeit the comparative was relatively easy.
Given the limited visibility on licensing, we typically assume licensing revenue grows in line with core revenue over the long term, as a proxy for GAW leveraging its IP, given the limited visibility of the phasing and performance of the individual licence and terms. This would appear to be conservative versus the historical relative growth rates: core’s operating profit CAGR from FY15–23 of c 33% is below the c 40% CAGR for licensing operating profit over the same time frame. We compare operating profit here as licensing revenue has only been disclosed since FY21.
With a gross margin of 100% and an operating margin of c 87% in FY23 due to limited associated operating costs, licensing’s relative growth rate to the core can have an important effect on GAW’s total group reported margin.
Dividends: Strong returns for shareholders
GAW’s dividend policy is to return ‘truly surplus cash’ to shareholders, which is defined as after a working cash buffer of three months’ worth of working capital requirement and six months’ worth of tax payments. Prior to FY22 the definition of truly surplus cash also required provision for six months of capital expenditure. Typically, the company announces and distributes multiple dividends in a financial year. Distributions are not made with any reference to an earnings or cash payout ratio as can be seen by the increase in total declared dividends to 415p/share in FY23 from 235p/share in FY22 and FY21. For FY24 and FY25, we assume total distributions increase to 425p/share and 435p/share, respectively. So far in FY24, GAW has declared total dividends of 195p/share (dividends of 145p/share and 50p/share), c 63% higher than cumulative dividends at the same time in FY23 of 120p/share (dividends of 90p/shares and 30p/share), indicating a strong improvement in cash generation.