Our primary valuation metric for Yowie is reverse DCF, since the full value of the current opportunity is likely to become apparent over a number of years rather than in near-term results. We believe that if the brand continues to prove itself, the WACC and relative risks to the story will more closely reflect a consumer goods story, albeit one with very high growth. The biggest sensitivity we see with the Yowie story is how customer demand evolves as the product is rolled out broadly to stores in the US and across the globe. While sales have increased nearly tenfold from US$2.4m in FY15 to an estimated US$22.1m in FY17, the trajectory has been somewhat choppy, consistent with the growth trajectory of many start-up companies.
So far, Yowie has proven success at the checkout stands at Walmart, but it is still early in the game. We see Yowie continuing to increase its sales in Walmart by moving to the main candy aisle and expanding into other retail outlets in both the US and other markets.
We expect the US to contribute more than 80% of revenues through FY19; however, there is further opportunity as Yowie renews its existing brand franchise in Australia, New Zealand and Asia, and extends into Europe and the Middle East. Management announced that sales began in Australia on 10 April. We expect sales in Canada to start during first quarter of FY18, slightly behind the company’s original goal of expanding into two new markets in FY17.
We believe that the real margin opportunity will be as Yowie moves beyond confectionery into entertainment (books, gaming, media and out-licensing). Merchandise and other licensing agreements would likely be structured as royalty revenues to the company, with some level of guarantee.
Licensing revenue would likely be highly profitable and drop almost entirely to the operating line, after some level of administrative costs. However, we have not built this into our earnings model for 2017-18 and we have made only a modest assumption of US$2.1m for FY19.
Exhibit 2: Current unit and net sales estimates – US and RoW
Fiscal year ended 30 June |
2016 |
2017e |
2018e |
2019e |
Estimated units sold (000s) |
|
|
|
|
United States |
8,600 |
12,738 |
21,109 |
29,065 |
% growth |
|
48% |
66% |
38% |
RoW |
- |
2,173 |
4,346 |
5,432 |
% growth |
|
NM |
100% |
25% |
Total units |
8,600 |
14,911 |
25,455 |
34,497 |
% growth |
|
73% |
71% |
36% |
|
|
|
|
|
Net effective price/unit (US$) |
|
|
|
|
United States |
1.50 |
1.45 |
1.40 |
1.40 |
% change |
NA |
-3% |
-3% |
0% |
RoW |
NM |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
% change |
|
NA |
0% |
0% |
Blended net effective price/unit |
1.50 |
1.46 |
1.42 |
1.42 |
% change |
|
-3% |
-3% |
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Product net revenues (US$000) |
|
|
|
|
United States |
12,888 |
18,470 |
29,553 |
40,691 |
% growth |
|
43% |
60% |
38% |
RoW |
0 |
3,259 |
6,519 |
8,149 |
% growth |
|
NM |
100% |
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total product net revenues |
12,888 |
21,730 |
36,072 |
48,840 |
% growth |
|
69% |
66% |
35% |
Source: Edison Investment Research estimates and Yowie Group. Note: Product net revenues exclude licensing revenues.
As Yowie is still an emerging growth story, we use a reverse DCF model to gauge long-term EBIT margins based on the current share price and our revenue growth expectations. Our 10-year reverse DCF model builds to sales of approximately US$117m by FY26. As noted above, we believe that there is a real opportunity for investors should Yowie move significantly beyond confectionery into other products and out-licensing – in essence becoming a diversified brand as opposed to a pure confectionary play. Evidence of success here would lead us to adjust our forecasts to more accurately reflect the impact of the increased license income.
We assume a terminal growth rate of 2% and use a WACC of 10.0% (reflecting 10% gearing), an equity risk premium of 5.4% and a beta of 1.2. We selected these to reflect what we view as conservative earnings forecasts, a once strong and proven children’s franchise and a business model that is not capital intensive. On this basis, our reverse DCF requires a terminal EBIT margin of 15%, a level that we regard as achievable given our forecast of a modest increase in out-licensing income over the next 10 years, to c 9% of total revenue, albeit still significantly short of management’s aspirations in this area.
Additionally, using our base case forecasts, we have explored alternative scenarios with a range of WACCs of 7-13% and terminal EBIT margins from 7-23%. This indicates the sensitivity to the terminal EBIT margin, which likely corresponds to the rate of development of licensing income over the period. At the same time, overachievement on revenue growth milestones would be associated with a decrease in perceived execution risk and hence in the WACC.
Exhibit 3: ADR value (US$/share) scenario analysis based on terminal EBIT margin & WACC
|
Terminal EBIT margin |
7% |
11% |
15% |
19% |
23% |
WACC |
7.0% |
2.83 |
4.16 |
5.48 |
6.81 |
8.13 |
8.0% |
2.28 |
3.33 |
4.37 |
5.41 |
6.46 |
9.0% |
1.89 |
2.74 |
3.58 |
4.43 |
5.28 |
10.0% |
1.60 |
2.30 |
3.00 |
3.70 |
4.40 |
11.0% |
1.37 |
1.96 |
2.55 |
3.14 |
3.73 |
12.0% |
1.18 |
1.69 |
2.19 |
2.70 |
3.20 |
13.0% |
1.04 |
1.47 |
1.91 |
2.34 |
2.78 |
Source: Edison Investment Research estimates