H118 results show lower costs as Prima trials proceed
Pixium reported H118 results on 26 July 2018, which as expected, showed a significantly lower operating expense rate versus the prior-year period. Pixium disclosed in February 2018 that it was halting further development of its Iris II epi-retinal implant and that it would devote its resources and strategy entirely on advancing its next-generation Prima sub-retinal device, thereby reducing its operating cost spend level.
Pixium reported €0.91m in H118 revenue (primarily from subsidies and research tax credits), down from €1.26m in H117, a €3.57m in operating loss (vs €5.27m in H117), and a €2.99m net loss (€0.20 per share), versus a €6.44m net loss in H118. Pixium benefited from a €1.37m positive revaluation charge of its stock-based compensation expense in H118, which explains why its reported net loss was lower than its operating loss. Excluding this positive charge, the adjusted net loss would have been €4.36m (€0.30 per share).
Pixium’s results compare favourably to our expectations of operating and net losses of €4.7m and €5.2m respectively. R&D (€3.05m) and G&A costs (€1.33m) were also both lower than our expectations. Operating cash flow was negative €5.49m, 21% lower than the negative €6.96m reported in H117.
EU feasibility study now reached complete enrolment
Prima is a miniaturised photovoltaic wireless sub-retinal implant that is implanted underneath the retina in a surgical procedure that may take less than 90 minutes under local anaesthesia. The device intends to replace the signal processing functions of photoreceptors damaged by degenerative conditions. It does so by electrically stimulating other healthy retinal cells, which would then transmit the information towards the brain via the optic nerve.
In late 2017, Pixium started the five-patient European feasibility study for its Prima photovoltaic wireless sub-retinal device advanced Dry-ARMD (Dry Age-related macular degeneration). On 25 January 2018, it announced the first human Prima activation as part of this feasibility study following a device implantation approximately one month previously (as per study protocol).
Following activation, the patient reported light perception in the central visual field, where there had been none previously, and proceeded to the visual re-education stage of the study (to improve interpretation of the elicited light signals emitted by Prima).
On 10 July 2018 Pixium announced that it has completed the fifth and final implantation of the feasibility study and that it expected the final patient to have his device activated in the coming weeks. All of the four previous implantations in the EU study resulted in successful consecutive activations and light perception, including the perception of white-yellow patterns with adjustable brightness, in areas where no central vision remained prior to implantation. The training and education programme, implemented as per the protocol, is intended to assist patients in interpreting the new light perception patterns. The firm indicates that results to date are in line with the theoretical and preclinical data and expectations. In our view, these successful activations are encouraging as an early suggestion of proof-of-concept that the device can interface with retinal cells to restore some visual perception in an area where vision had been lost due to prolonged degenerative disease. Interim data from the EU feasibility study, which should include safety and some functional vision measures, are expected near the end of Q418.
The firm also plans to present and discuss initial experiences of the involved surgical technique and observations from the Prima human implantations at upcoming retinal surgery and ophthalmology conferences, including EURETINA and EVER in September 2018 in Europe, and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) annual meeting in October 2018 in Chicago.
Review of clinical development timelines
Following attainment of six-month data from the EU feasibility study by YE18, Pixium’s European regulatory strategy anticipates starting an EU pivotal study in H119. We estimate it will require 12 months of follow-up safety and efficacy data for European regulators to provide CE Mark approval. While CE Mark approval was attained for Pixium’s Iris II epi-retinal implant using completed study data from only 10 implanted patients, Iris II was targeting a much more narrow rare/orphan disease market (retinitis pigmentosa and related rare dystrophies) and an existing predicate epi-retinal device (Argus II) had already been approved. For Prima, which is aiming to treat the demonstrably larger advanced Dry-ARMD market (we estimate late-stage ARMD’s prevalence is over 6x higher than all-stage RP) and for which no comparable predicate device exists, we estimate that the EU pivotal study may require between 50-60 patients. However, the true size will not be known until the current EU feasibility study is completed, as the final recruitment size for the EU pivotal study will likely depend upon the safety and level of visual improvement shown within the EU feasibility study. We reiterate that generally, to obtain CE Mark approval, product safety is the primary consideration for regulators (CE Mark approval generally does not require demonstration of long-term clinical efficacy). We continue to estimate that EU pivotal study data will be available in early 2021, leading to potential EU commercialisation (CE Mark approval) in H122.
The US regulatory pathway for medical devices is more comprehensive. Our expectation is that following the attainment of 12-month data from the current US feasibility study, a larger US pilot study would need to be carried on a larger number of subjects (we estimate approximately 30 patients in total) prior to the start of a US pivotal study. As stated previously, we now estimate that US recruitment for this pilot study would start in H120.
Under an ideal scenario, Pixium could potentially also include data from sites participating in the EU pivotal trial as part of the US pilot study, which would reduce the need for duplicate or overlapping studies on similar patient populations. We assume this will be the case, thus allowing for the completion of the US pilot study in H121 (from H220, previously). We assume a US registration-enabling pivotal study would then start in 2021, which we believe will likely require 60-80 subjects and 18-24 months of follow up. Hence, we now assume the earliest possible date for US approval and launch will be 2024 (vs H223 previously).
Exhibit 1: Projected clinical development pathways for EU and US
EU clinical pathway |
US clinical pathway |
Clinical studies needed |
1. Small-size (~5-patient) feasibility study |
1. Medium-size (~30-patient) pilot study |
2. Medium-size (~50-60-patient) pivotal trial |
2. Larger (~60-80patient) pivotal trial |
Projected characteristics and requirements for pivotal trial |
6-12 months of follow-up data |
18-24 months of follow-up data |
Study must show product safety |
Study must show safety and efficacy |
Projected commercial launch timeline |
H122 |
2024 |
Source: Edison Investment Research estimates
We expect that CE Mark clearance (and EU launch) would occur approximately two years earlier than US pre-market approval (PMA) and launch.