Investment process: Benefiting from broad and deep networks
HVPE is managed by HarbourVest, which was set up in 1982 as a specialist private equity manager. Headquartered in Boston, US, it also has offices in London, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Bogotá, Beijing, Toronto, Seoul and Tel Aviv, giving it broad geographical coverage. HarbourVest runs a range of primary and secondary funds, as well as making direct co-investments alongside the managers of underlying funds.
HVPE invests in HarbourVest funds at inception, with allocations set to ensure appropriate portfolio diversification by geography, stage, strategy, vintage and industry. The fund receives preferential terms on new funds raised by HarbourVest, including being offered an allocation of at least 5%. A consistent rate of investment ensures a broad spread of vintages, and the fund-of-funds structure enhances this averaging effect, with commitments made by HVPE to HarbourVest funds, which then make commitments over a period of three to four years to underlying managers, who invest in operating companies over the following three to five years.
HarbourVest undertakes considerable due diligence before investing in underlying managers, backed up by the long experience and extensive networks of its investment professionals. In the primary segment (where investments are into a ‘blind pool’), commitments are made to underlying funds at formation, and the HarbourVest team will focus on assessing such factors as the investment skills, leadership and performance record of the fund manager, the attractiveness of the fund’s investment focus and strategy, and contractual terms and features such as fund size, expected duration, exposure limits and fees.
Where it makes investments in secondary assets (whole or part portfolios of maturing private equity investments), the managers value the operating companies in the portfolio on a bottom-up basis, projecting future performance and assessing the capabilities of the underlying fund manager. HarbourVest has experience in complex secondary market transactions, as illustrated by the Absolute and Conversus acquisitions in 2011 and 2012, where HarbourVest was able to offer liquidity to existing investors who sought an exit. The transactions were particularly complex because they involved taking private two listed private equity funds.
Direct investments in private companies – usually co-investments alongside the general partners who run the underlying funds – usually arise as a result of HarbourVest’s strong and deep relationships with leading private equity investors. The team reviews about 100 such opportunities each year, assisted by a proprietary database covering 20 years of transactions.
Primary funds form the core of the HVPE portfolio, with c 35% in secondary funds and about half that figure in direct investments.
Current portfolio positioning
HVPE’s portfolio is broadly diversified and at 30 April included 34 HarbourVest funds and two direct co-investments, giving access to more than 700 underlying funds and partnerships, which in turn are invested in nearly 7,000 operating companies. Exhibit 3 below illustrates the portfolio split by stage, phase, geography, strategy and industry. While biased towards the US, the portfolio is truly global, with 12-15% of assets invested in emerging markets, as well as significant exposure to Europe, which was increased during FY16 and has been a source of positive performance recently.
In terms of stage, the majority of assets are invested in buyout situations. Around one-third of the portfolio is in venture and growth capital, a highly competitive space where HarbourVest’s longstanding relationships with the top managers in the sector are key to securing allocations in new funds. Venture capital is slanted towards the technology/telecoms sector, which was the second-largest industry weighting at 30 April, as well as to biotech and healthcare.
Exhibit 3: HVPE portfolio profile end-April 2016
Stage |
% |
Phase |
% |
Geography |
% |
Strategy |
% |
Industry |
% |
Buyout |
62 |
Growth |
44 |
US |
62 |
Primary |
49 |
Consumer/financial |
34 |
Venture and growth equity |
34 |
Mature |
28 |
Europe |
21 |
Secondary |
34 |
Technology/telecom |
31 |
Other |
4 |
Investment |
28 |
Asia Pacific |
11 |
Direct |
17 |
Industrial/other |
19 |
|
|
|
|
Rest of World |
6 |
|
|
Medical/biotech |
16 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: HarbourVest Global Private Equity, Edison Investment Research.
HVPE aims for a balance of investment phases to try to smooth out the often lumpy nature of private equity returns. Broadly speaking, the investment phase is when capital is allocated by HarbourVest funds to underlying managers to build their portfolios; the growth phase is the bulk of the life of the underlying investment; and the mature phase is the point towards which realisations begin to be achieved, either through M&A activity or by companies becoming publicly listed.
This maps (albeit imperfectly) to HVPE’s three stages of capital allocation – commitments (which are broadly made to HarbourVest funds at launch), investments (when the underlying funds draw down the cash to invest in operating companies) and realisations, when assets are divested. Exhibit 4 (left-hand chart) shows the evolution of these three areas over HVPE’s last six financial years. In line with the fund’s aim of achieving balance, on average the level of commitments, investments and realisations has been broadly equal.
During FY16 $526m was committed to five new HarbourVest funds (HarbourVest X Programme, a US fund; HarbourVest 2015 Global fund; HIPEP VII Europe; HarbourVest Canada Growth Fund; and HarbourVest Mezzanine Income Fund, which is focused on building a portfolio of loans and was included following the broadening of the investment mandate to include non-equity investments). Existing funds committed $376m to underlying investments ($209m to primary funds, $137m to secondary investments and $30m to direct co-investments), and HVPE received $362.5m from realisations.
Since the FY16 year-end, HVPE has committed $200m to four new HarbourVest funds, including a global multi-strategy fund of funds, global secondary funds and a global direct co-investment fund. Cash invested by HarbourVest funds totalled $61.1m for the first three months of FY17, and HVPE received realisations of $57.5m. If the same pace of commitments, investments and realisations were sustained throughout the year, FY17 would see higher commitments, lower investments and lower realisations than FY16. The higher rate of commitments will feed through to a higher level of cash investments in the future as the funds are drawn down by underlying managers.
Exhibit 4: Commitments/investments/realisations and coverage ratios
|
Commitments, investments, realisations |
Commitment and coverage ratios |
|
|
Source: Thomson Datastream, Edison Investment Research
|
The commitment level shown in Exhibit 4 (right-hand chart) is calculated by taking the total net asset value of the investments and commitments allocated to HarbourVest secondary and direct funds and to underlying partnerships, and dividing this by HVPE’s NAV. (Technically, funds are first ‘committed’ to HarbourVest funds, and then become ‘allocated’ at the first close of the underlying fund. HVPE’s managers say that where committed funds remain unallocated after seven years or more – as was the case for $107m of commitments at FY16 – this cash is likely to flow back to HVPE as the HarbourVest funds mature.) The commitment level (green line) has ticked up in recent months, and allocated commitments stood at 139% of NAV at 30 April, with total commitments at 169% of NAV. This increase in commitments reflects HVPE’s aim of having c 50% of assets (44% at 30 April) in the growth phase, which typically runs from five to nine years after initial commitment.
HVPE publishes a coverage ratio as a measure of its ability to meet commitments. This is a rolling figure that compares total cash, available credit and current-year projected realisations with the next three years’ commitments. The fund’s managers note that comparing three years of forecast outgoings against one year of forecast available resources means the ratio is a very conservative measure. At 30 April the coverage ratio stood at 95%, up from 82% at the end of August before the increased credit facility was in place. (Between September and January, the ratio was more than 120%, reflecting a time lag between the increase in available credit and a subsequent increase in commitments.)