Current portfolio positioning
In the managers’ view, the market sell-off of the past year has created fresh opportunities to gain exposure to the high-quality companies they seek at particularly attractive valuations. Despite the current uncertainties pervading the market environment, they are not looking to use these opportunities to move the portfolio in an excessively defensive direction, to simply ‘hide’ during the forthcoming recession. Equally, they do not believe that now is the time to take on excessive risk or bet on macroeconomic outcomes. Rather, they are aiming to balance their portfolio with a mix of defensive and quality names.
On the defensive side, the rising cost of living has reduced consumers’ spending power, compelling them to ‘trade down’ and shop at discount stores where possible, to seek out bargains. On the back of this trend, JGGI’s managers expect discount retailers such as Ross Stores, TK Maxx, Burlingtons and Target to do well. They have added a position in Ross Stores in the last few months, and also have a smaller holding in Target.
Elsewhere, another recent acquisition is Union Pacific (UNP), a rail company specialising in goods transport, which has won several contracts for complex haulage tasks involving combined rail and road transport. These contracts will enhance UNP’s earnings over 2023. The managers have also added a position in Uber, a leading ride share company, in the past few months, funded by a switch out of its competitor, Lyft, whose performance has disappointed expectations. The managers prefer Uber on the basis that it is ‘in control of its destiny regardless of the pending recession’. They view the company’s expansion plans as achievable and likely to drive earnings over coming years.
To make space for these acquisitions and top-ups to other holdings, the managers have taken profits on a number of holdings, including several long-term holdings in industrial names, which enjoyed some tailwinds during 2022, as they have been able to increase prices without push back from buyers. These price increases boosted earnings. However, as economic conditions tighten, buyers are more likely to reduce demand in the face of price increases. In anticipation of this, the managers have taken profits on some industrial names including Ingersoll Rand, a manufacturer of specialist industrial machinery, and Trane Technologies, a provider of building products and equipment. They have also trimmed their position in luxury goods company LVMH. They view this as a ‘fantastic’ stock with very good long-term prospects, however they are cautious about the near-term demand for the company’s products given pressures on consumers to tighten their belts in the face of cost-of-living rises.
Woodhouse and his colleagues have also trimmed their holdings in a couple of pharmaceutical and healthcare names, including Novo Nordisk, a leader in treatments for both diabetes and obesity. They view Novo Nordisk’s valuation signal as less strong than previously, after recent strong gains, as much of the growth potential from the company’s two major drugs has now been priced in. The managers have also reduced their position in Boston Scientific, a provider of medical devices. Demand for the company’s products surged as elective surgeries resumed after the pandemic, but with COVID-induced backlogs now dissipating, the managers see less scope for further growth. As Woodhouse says, they ‘do not want to overstay their welcome’ in these strong performers. The managers have, however, added to their position in another pharmaceutical producer, AstraZeneca, which, in the managers’ view, still has an interesting pipeline of new drugs.
Exhibit 1: Top 10 holdings (at 31 December 2022)
|
Company |
Country |
Sector |
Portfolio weight % |
30 December 2022 |
31 December 2021* |
Microsoft |
US |
Tech – software |
5.5 |
5.1 |
Amazon |
US |
Media |
4.6 |
5.5 |
Chevron |
US |
Energy |
3.0 |
N/A |
AbbVie |
US |
Pharma/medtech |
2.9 |
N/A |
Deere |
US |
Industrial cyclicals |
2.6 |
N/A |
LVMH |
France |
Retail |
2.5 |
N/A |
Mastercard |
US |
Financial services |
2.5 |
2.5 |
NXP Semiconductors |
Netherlands |
Technology – semi & hardware |
2.4 |
2.4 |
CME Group |
US |
Financial services |
2.3 |
N/A |
VINCI |
France |
Industrial cyclicals |
2.3 |
2.1 |
Top 10 (% of portfolio) |
|
|
30.6 |
29.8 |
|
Source: JPMorgan Growth & Income, Edison Investment Research, Bloomberg, Morningstar. Note: *N/A where not in end-December 2021 top 10.
|
JGGI’s portfolio remains relatively concentrated, with the top 10 holdings representing c 30% of portfolio holdings (Exhibit 1) at end-December 2022, close to the level at end-December 2021. Microsoft and Amazon remain JGGI’s largest holdings, and NXP Semiconductors and Mastercard still feature, but there are several new names in the top 10 holdings list, drawn from several different sectors, including energy (Chevron) and industrial cyclicals (farm machinery producer Deere and engineering and construction company VINCI), reflecting the managers’ efforts to balance the portfolio with defensive and growth names.
Exhibit 2: Portfolio sector exposure vs MSCI AC World index (% unless stated)
|
|
Portfolio end- Dec 2022 |
Portfolio end-Dec 2021 |
Change (pp) |
Index weight |
Active weight vs index (pp) |
Trust weight/ index weight (x) |
Pharma/medtech |
10.5 |
10.2 |
0.3 |
11.0 |
(0.5) |
1.0 |
Tech – semi & hardware |
9.8 |
8.5 |
1.3 |
10.7 |
(0.9) |
0.9 |
Banks |
8.4 |
9.9 |
(1.5) |
8.9 |
(0.5) |
0.9 |
Retail |
8.3 |
8.2 |
0.1 |
5.8 |
2.5 |
1.4 |
Industrial cyclicals |
7.6 |
8.1 |
(0.5) |
7.7 |
(0.1) |
1.0 |
Media |
7.3 |
10.5 |
(3.2) |
7.1 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
Technology – software |
5.5 |
5.1 |
0.4 |
6.7 |
(1.2) |
0.8 |
Energy |
5.4 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
5.6 |
(0.2) |
1.0 |
Financial services |
4.9 |
0.0 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
Automobiles & auto parts |
3.7 |
4.4 |
(0.7) |
2.4 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
Others |
21.1 |
28.0 |
(6.9) |
29.3 |
(8.2) |
0.7 |
Cash |
7.5 |
7.1 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
7.5 |
N/A |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Source: JPMorgan Global Growth & Income, Edison Investment Research
|
At the sector level, the trust’s largest exposure is to pharmaceuticals/medtech and this has increased over the past year, reducing the underweight to this sector. Exposure to energy, financial services and tech hardware and software has also increased, reducing underweights to all these sectors. The most notable reduction in exposure has been to media, although the portfolio remains slightly overweight this sector. Exposure to bank names has also declined, taking the portfolio to neutral against the benchmark.
Exhibit 3: Portfolio geographic exposure vs MSCI AC World index (% unless stated)
|
|
Portfolio end- Dec 2022 |
Portfolio end-Dec 2021 |
Change (pp) |
Index weight |
Active weight vs index (pp) |
Trust weight/ index weight (x) |
North America |
65.4 |
62.1 |
3.3 |
60.3 |
5.1 |
1.1 |
Europe & ME ex-UK |
14.7 |
24.2 |
(9.5) |
12.7 |
2.0 |
1.2 |
United Kingdom |
5.3 |
0.7 |
4.6 |
3.9 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
Emerging markets |
3.3 |
4.9 |
(1.6) |
11.2 |
(7.9) |
0.3 |
Japan |
3.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
5.6 |
(2.6) |
0.5 |
Pacific ex-Japan |
0.8 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
3.2 |
(2.4) |
0.3 |
Canada |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
3.1 |
-3.1 |
0.0 |
Cash |
7.5 |
7.1 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
7.5 |
N/A |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
Source: JPMorgan Global Growth & Income, Edison Investment Research
|
The portfolio’s geographical allocations have not changed significantly since our last update. North America (mainly the US) is still the portfolio’s largest regional exposure and largest overweight. While exposure to Europe has declined notably, it remains the trust’s second-largest regional overweight. A neutral position in Japan, established early in 2022, has reverted to a customary underweight, as the managers trimmed a holding in Bridgestone, the tyre company, in favour of its French competitor Michelin, which they believe is more attractively valued. This shift provides an illustration of how bottom-up stock selection and conviction drive allocations at the country level.
JGGI’s largest geographical underweight remains to emerging markets (EM), where the managers remain very selective, and wary of China, where they believe systemic risk is substantial and difficult to assess. However, the portfolio has some indirect exposure to China and other EM economies via its 5.1% overweight to Europe, thanks to holdings in companies such as Volkswagen, whose electric vehicles the managers expect to eventually claim a significant share of the Chinese market. And the managers have put aside their general caution on EM to purchase Indian bank HDFC, which Woodhouse views as ‘one of the best banks in the world’. Woodhouse also notes that the team is more positive on the Indian economy than on most other EM markets, with growth expected to outpace that of its largest EM rival, China, all other EM economies and all major advanced economies over the coming year, according to the International Monetary Fund.
JGGI’s portfolio currently contains 59 stocks, within its usual range, while turnover, including trims and top-ups, is also within the long-term range of 60–80%. Portfolio gearing stood at 2.7% at 27 January 2023, and the managers feel this is the appropriate amount of leverage at the moment, given uncertainties regarding the outlook for global inflation, economic activity and corporate earnings. However, they do not rule out increasing the amount of portfolio gearing if an increase in market volatility generates more compelling investment opportunities.