Phase II study in CML to complete in H218
Inecalcitol is being tested in an open label Phase II study in patients with CML. Inecalcitol is administered in combination with oral imatinib in patients with incomplete molecular response after at least two years on imatinib. Target enrolment is 42 patients in France and Hybrigenics plans to combine inecalcitol with other Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A new Phase II clinical trial in collaboration with the American consortium, Cure CML is in preparation. At February 2017, the trial had enrolled 21 patients and will complete in H218, according to Hybrigenics.
Initial efficacy: 43% of patients respond
In February 2017, Hybrigenics presented the first clinical data from the study. At the interim analysis, inecalcitol plus imatinib showed a further decrease from major molecular response (MMR) in six of 14 patients at three months (43%). Furthermore, three of nine patients (33%) who have completed one year in the study had a deep molecular response (DMR). Additionally, preclinical data showed that inecalcitol in combination with imatinib had synergistic effects in experiments in vitro by inhibiting the proliferation of CML stem cells, which are involved in relapse. The current Phase II trial aims to replicate this effect and prolong remission or achieve a functional cure.
Study end points and design
The primary end point is the proportion of patients achieving a deep molecular response, in particular an MR4.5 response, measured by the reduction in the expression of the BCR-ABL oncogene. The study is divided into two parts. In the first part of the study, inecalcitol will be added to imatinib for 12 months. In the second part, patients will be followed up after discontinuation of inecalcitol. Imatinib will be maintained for two years and then will be stopped for those still in MR4.5. These patients will be followed for an additional two years after discontinuation of imatinib.
Efficacy in CML can be measured as haematological response, which measures white-cell count; cytogenetic response, which tests the Philadelphia chromosome in the marrow; and molecular response, which measures expression of BCL-ACR by PCR in circulating blood cells.
Exhibit 2: Definitions of response
Type |
Type of response |
Haematological response |
■
Partial response (PHR): reduction in white cells, but not to normal levels.
■
Complete response (CHR): white-cell count at or below approximately 12,000 white cells/µl.
|
Molecular response |
■
MMR: three log reduction in the amount of BCR-ABL protein. BCR-ABL less than or equal to 0.1% in international scale (IS).
■
Deep molecular response (DMR): MR4 (four log reduction, BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01%); MR4.5 (4.5 log or BCR-ABL≤0.0032%) or MR5 (five log or BCR-ABL ≤0.001%).*
|
Cytogenetic response |
■
Cytogenetic response (CR or CyR): any reduction in Ph+ chromosome reading.
■
Major cytogenetic response (MCR or MCyR): 0%-35% of Ph+ cells in the marrow
■
Complete cytogenetic response (CCR or CCyR): no Ph+ cells can be measured.
|
Type |
Haematological response |
Molecular response |
Cytogenetic response |
Type of response |
■
Partial response (PHR): reduction in white cells, but not to normal levels.
■
Complete response (CHR): white-cell count at or below approximately 12,000 white cells/µl.
|
■
MMR: three log reduction in the amount of BCR-ABL protein. BCR-ABL less than or equal to 0.1% in international scale (IS).
■
Deep molecular response (DMR): MR4 (four log reduction, BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01%); MR4.5 (4.5 log or BCR-ABL≤0.0032%) or MR5 (five log or BCR-ABL ≤0.001%).*
|
■
Cytogenetic response (CR or CyR): any reduction in Ph+ chromosome reading.
■
Major cytogenetic response (MCR or MCyR): 0%-35% of Ph+ cells in the marrow
■
Complete cytogenetic response (CCR or CCyR): no Ph+ cells can be measured.
|
Source: Edison Investment Research; *Cross et al. Leukemia. 2012
CML background and inecalcitol’s value proposition
CML is a myeloproliferative disorder affecting the haematopoietic stem cell compartment. CML arises from a translocation between the BCR and the ABL genes. This translocation creates the Philadelphia chromosome and the formation of a unique BCR-ABL protein product. This protein has kinase activity that drives uncontrolled proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells. CML is graded into three stages – chronic, accelerated and blast – defined by the percentage of blast cells in the blood. In a healthy person, the proportion of blast cells in the bone marrow and blood is below 5%. CML symptoms include susceptibility to infection, anaemia, weight loss and swelling of the lymph glands. CML is perhaps one of the most treatable forms of leukaemia. The first-line treatment for CML is TKIs. Most patients on TKIs achieve a lasting molecular response. Moreover, with second-generation TKIs, such as nilotinib (Tasigna, Novartis) and dasatinib (Sprycel, BMS) now on the market, more patients can achieve further responses, raising the expectations that survival rates improve, and second-generation TKIs may potentially achieve a functional cure for the disease. Ponatinib (Iclusing, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, acquired by Takeda for $5.2bn) is the only drug approved and marketed that addresses the T315I mutation in the BCR-ABL oncogene, which makes the cancer resistant to imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib. Recent data show that patients who achieve DMRs can safely cease their therapy without relapsing, which is called treatment-free remission (TFR). Even patients who do relapse can still be responsive to other TKIs. Around 40% of patients who stop treatment after achieving stable DMR remain in TFR.
Guidelines from the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommend TKI treatment indefinitely in all patients who respond to it. However, long-term treatment with TKIs has been associated with side effects and loss of quality of life. Furthermore, these products have an economic burden. Gleevec’s list price is $120k per year, per patient in the US; Sprycel and Tasigna cost about the same. Gleevec’s US patent has expired and generic imatinibs from Teva and Sun Pharma have reached the market, although no information on pricing is available. In Europe, most TKIs cost around $30k per year, per patient. Therefore, achieving lasting DMRs that could take the patient off treatment would represent an innovative approach to improve patients’ quality of life and reduce costs. Inecalcitol could fit in this strategy and become an adjunct to other therapies, rather than directly competing with them. We believe that the Phase II initial data show the potential impact of inecalcitol on the CML treatment paradigm, due to its benign safety profile and potential to further improve molecular responses leading to discontinuation of treatment and functional cures.
We estimate c 14,250 new CML patients per year in the EU and the US (Sources: US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme and the European Treatment and Outcomes Study for CML). We maintain our forecast of EU/US peak sales for inecalcitol of $257m in CML. Hybrigenics plans to apply for orphan drug status in the EU and US based on these initial data.