Updated rolling three-year plan provides continuity
La Doria outlines its financial targets and strategic business plan for a rolling three-year period, usually at the beginning of each financial year. The financial targets outlined in February 2016 were mostly below those set out last year, as shown in Exhibit 3 below.
Exhibit 3: Current vs prior financial targets (2016e-17e)
|
2016e |
2017e |
€m |
Old |
New |
% change |
Old |
New |
% change |
Revenue |
750.0 |
685.4 |
-8.6% |
777.0 |
722.5 |
-7.0% |
EBITDA |
74.3 |
68.4 |
-7.9% |
79.3 |
72.9 |
-8.1% |
EBIT |
59.9 |
55.3 |
-7.7% |
64.9 |
60.1 |
-7.4% |
PBT |
55.8 |
52.1 |
-6.6% |
61.2 |
57.3 |
-6.4% |
Net profit (pre minorities) |
36.7 |
36.8 |
0.3% |
40.5 |
41.2 |
1.7% |
Group net profit |
32.2 |
36.8 |
14.3% |
35.7 |
41.2 |
15.4% |
Net debt |
105.8 |
110.4 |
4.3% |
81.1 |
86.9 |
7.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA margin (%) |
9.9% |
10.0% |
0.1% |
10.2% |
10.1% |
-0.1% |
EBIT margin (%) |
8.0% |
8.1% |
0.1% |
8.4% |
8.3% |
0.0% |
The lower sales prices for new contracts (negotiated in summer 2015 with validity from 2016) were to blame for the reduction in sales targets. That said, it is testament to management’s commitment to stem the volatility of the business and to reduce the overall dependence on the ‘red line’ that a larger cut to the top line is mitigated throughout the P&L and the net profit targets (pre-minorities) were broadly unchanged. Net profit targets (pre-minorities) benefit from a lower forecast tax rate, and at the group level the main benefit stems from eliminating minority interests. La Doria increased its stake in the UK subsidiary, La Doria Holding (LDH), from 51% to 57.9% in Q315. More importantly, the LDH shareholder agreement was reviewed and updated. This has led to a change in the accounting treatment of the minorities: La Doria now consolidates 100% of its minorities, and treats as debt the value of the put options that exist against it.
We compare our forecasts relative to group guidance in the financials section on page 9.
To help achieve its financial targets, the company sets out the following strategic guidelines:
■
Further growth in markets where La Doria is a current market leader, including the UK, Japan, Australia and Germany. Worldwide export growth in Italian tomato purchases has been well into the double digits over the past three years.
■
Achieve growth in markets where La Doria is currently under-represented (mainly the US), through new supply agreements.
■
Develop new markets, in particular emerging markets (China, South-East Asia and UAE). In 2012, La Doria joined Tradizione Italiana, a consortium of 12 leading Italian food companies, representing a wide range of specialities and food categories, to promote the quality of Italian food in emerging markets. Although these markets are currently small, growth rates have been high, suggesting there is potential to build and develop La Doria’s position.
■
Develop the ready-made sauces business and continue to grow the acquired Pa.fi.al business in La Doria’s existing markets such as the UK. The growth of the ready-made sauces market ties in with the overarching objective of reducing the volatility of the business and improving visibility through the development of higher value-added, non-seasonal products, which are also margin enhancing.
■
Improve market share in Italy of its Althea brand (acquired through Pa.fi.al) in ready-made sauces. More generally, La Doria is striving to improve market share across its product range, taking advantage of the growing market share of private label over branded products and also the relative immaturity of the Italian private-label market. The ambition is to become a leading tomato-based product player. We note La Doria is already number one in private-label domestic fruit-based beverages, and is a leading player in private-label vegetables.
■
Extend higher value-added product ranges, including ready-made sauces, soups and minestrone, organic pulses and enriched baked beans, which are margin enhancing and have the added benefit of reducing volatility and seasonality.
■
Further use of innovative packaging with a low environmental impact.
■
Increase the number of long-term contracts with strategic customers, improving volume and pricing visibility, thus helping to reduce volatility.
■
Simplify the supply chain through direct relations with producers of strategic raw materials, building partnerships and long-term contracts with a smaller number of strategic suppliers, thus delivering economies of scale and reducing volatility.
■
Improve efficiency and promote sustainable development through reducing energy, water consumption and waste.
As illustrated in Exhibit 1, the red line (tomato-based products) contributed 23% of revenues in FY15 and is the single largest contributor to group profits.
Over the past few years, there have been a number of structural changes in the Italian tomato market that have been favourable to the company, as they have shifted the balance of supply and demand back in favour of the processors by stabilising the level of production in the market. These have had the effect of improving the profitability outlook while reducing the volatility of the business, thus increasing the visibility of forecasts. Primarily these factors are:
■
Legislative reform – the implementation of the European Fruit and Vegetable Reform took effect in 2011, meaning that agricultural farm subsidies are no longer linked specifically to the quantity of tomatoes grown. This led to a material reduction in Italian tomato production from 5.65m tonnes in 2009 to a nadir of 4.1m tonnes in 2013 (-27%). 2014 production bounced off the lows and stood at 4.9m tonnes, and 2015 production increased again to 5.4m tonnes. This was in line with expectations, which stood at 5.3m tonnes. Legislative reform has effectively reduced the supply/demand imbalance in Italian tomatoes and reduced the level of stock, thus improving pricing stability.
■
Sector consolidation – there has been a c 40% reduction in the number of companies operating in the Italian tomato industry over the last 10 years as the less efficient and smaller players have exited. This underlying long-term trend was accelerated by the financial crisis. It has resulted in a more stable and rational pricing environment among the remaining players, as well as market share gains, though there is still room for improvement here.
These factors have resulted in an alignment of interests; all stakeholders in the value chain of the Italian tomato industry now have an interest in avoiding overproduction. In April 2014, a number of stakeholders created the cluster ‘district of the Central and Southern Italian industrial tomato’. This was set up to promote coordination among the different areas and to improve efficiency through better planning. By collaborating as a cohort, the industry should be better placed to match supply with demand, thus avoiding large-scale overproduction.
The issue with the 2015 campaign was down to unfounded fears of overproduction. At the very start of the campaign, record temperatures in southern Italy during the month of July caused an acceleration in the ripening of the tomatoes, hence causing an abundance of crop. This turned out to be a timing issue rather than a sign of an excess crop, but the unfounded fears caused pricing to soften. La Doria, however, has managed to mitigate the impact of lower pricing thanks to lower raw material costs and greater production efficiencies. We note, however, that overall 2015 production did increase on the 2014 level, though the increase was in line with industry expectations.
On the demand side, there have been a number of factors that have improved La Doria’s outlook:
■
Private-label growth – this has been a trend across the consumer space, as the market becomes polarised between the leading brands and private label. The long-term trend of the secondary and tertiary brands being squeezed is set to continue. Specifically within the tomato-based products space, in FY15 private label overall lost 140bps volume share in Italy (source: IRI Infoscan), and gained 10bps in the UK (source: Kantar Worldpanel). Demand for tomato-based products was down 470bps in volume terms in Italy (source: IRI Infoscan), and private label share was down due to aggressive promotional activity by the brands. In contrast, however, in the UK demand for tomato-based products was up 340bps in volume terms (source: Kantar Worldpanel), and private label share was stable despite the aggressive promotional environment. In Italy La Doria now holds an 18.9% private label share (source: Symphony IRI) and in the UK this is 38% (source: LDH management estimates using Kantar Worldpanel data). This compares with 17.7% and 38.5% respectively in 2015. Over the last few years La Doria has made significant progress in both markets, as in 2012 private label share was 12.4% in Italy and 36.5% in the UK.
■
Italian tomato demand – the demand for tomatoes specifically designated as Italian is increasing, with the export of Italian tomatoes growing by 15% 2012-15 (source: ANICAV based on FederAlimentare data). Approximately 80% of La Doria revenues are exported. On the back of the favourable perception towards Italian cooking, La Doria launched the umbrella brand Cook Italian in the UK in 2011. Within the tomato segment, the brand has now reached 3.9% market share, or 10% share of the branded tomato segment.
La Doria has a number of internal strategies to enhance profitability and reduce volatility:
■
Moving up the value chain – increasing exposure to higher-margin value-added products such as ready-made sauces. The Pa.fi.al acquisition fit perfectly within this strategy. This had the dual benefit of reducing exposure to the lower-value peeled tomato category and increasing underlying margins. In addition, it also reduced the seasonality of the business.
■
Best practice – management has consistently been driving through changes to improve procurement, fixed-cost efficiencies and volume leverage throughout the business.
The annual tomato campaign runs from the end of July to the start of October. Typically La Doria negotiates annual contracts with its customers, and hence prices, just before or during the processing season. This gives La Doria good visibility over the outlook for its profitability until Q3 of the following year, when the next pricing rounds occur. La Doria establishes both the volume and pricing of the contracts, so by the end of the processing campaign the total cost is broadly known.
As stated above, 2015 production stood at 5.4m tonnes, compared to sector forecasts of 5.3m tonnes. As discussed, the main problem with the 2015 campaign was the intense heat at the start of the season. This brought forward part of the harvest and created concerns regarding overproduction, which ultimately proved to be unfounded. The total cost of the 2015 campaign was down on the prior year due to a reduction in the raw material costs and also a significantly higher industrial yield given the efficiency of the campaign during the first few weeks. Prices for 2016 are down in the region of 10%.
It is still early days for the 2016 campaign but the current forecast is for a 10% decline in total tomato production at national level, to c 4.8-5.0m tonnes. La Doria management expects the cost of tomatoes to be flat, and hence the 2016 campaign should be benign.
As shown in Exhibit 1, the vegetable line (pulses and beans) represented 26% of revenues in FY15. The 2014 season saw a reduction in the cost of raw materials, and hence 2015 pricing for La Doria’s products was slightly down as a result. The 2015 season saw a greater reduction in raw material costs due to an improvement in crop yields, and hence 2016 pricing is expected to be down again. In Italy, the canned vegetable market witnessed 2.5% volume growth during 2015, and 3.8% value growth. The market leader won back a small amount of market share, while the other brands declined. The private label sub-segment, which is where La Doria mainly competes, also declined slightly (source: Iri Infoscan). In the UK, La Doria’s key product in the category is private-label baked beans, where it holds a 48.4% market share, down 420bps vs 2014 (source: LDH management estimates using Kantar Worldpanel data). The decline was caused by one of La Doria’s customers introducing another supplier, but management expects market share to recover during 2016 as its new range of baked beans with inclusion gains traction. In 2015, the overall baked beans market was down in both volume (-2.1%) and value (-0.8%) terms; however private label grew volume by 90bps (source: Kantar Worldpanel).
La Doria management is keen to expand the vegetable line. The division offsets the more commoditised red line products and also has the advantage that production can occur throughout the year, rather than being concentrated within the three summer months of the tomato processing campaign. Expanding the vegetable line therefore would help improve group efficiency.
La Doria owns 58.0% of its subsidiary LDH. The LDH shareholder agreement was reviewed and updated following La Doria’s purchase of an additional 7.0% stake during 2015. This has led to a change in the accounting treatment of the minorities: La Doria now consolidates 100% of its minorities, and treats as debt the value of the put options that exist against it. LDH is the leader in the British market for private-label tomato-based products, pulses, dry pasta and canned tuna. The ‘other’ category is mainly composed of LDH’s sales and accounted for 28% of group sales in FY15.
The remaining 42.1% stake in LDH is owned by a combination of Thai Union Group, Di Martino and management. LDH’s three major shareholders – La Doria, Thai Union Group and Di Martino – together supply the majority of its ranges across tomatoes, pulses, tuna and pasta.
During FY15 the ‘other’ line witnessed stable volumes and a slight reduction in pricing.