Investment process: Top-down and bottom-up considerations
Managers Dean Orrico and Rob Lauzon follow a combination of top-down and bottom-up investment processes aiming to invest in a broad portfolio of actively managed Canadian and US equity income securities generating total returns in excess of the benchmark S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend index. Orrico chairs the Middlefield Group investment committee that oversees all the mandates for Middlefield funds. The committee meets at least weekly; discussions encompass the outlook for markets including interest rates, monetary accommodation and favoured developed market exposure – a key consideration is the outlook for the Canadian versus the US economy. The committee provides information to the Middlefield portfolio managers regarding their asset allocation decisions, while the individual managers are responsible for populating the funds. Orrico is the lead fund manager of MCT and along with Lauzon is assisted on a day-to-day basis by Mike Foley, who is an analyst focusing on bottom-up research on individual stocks and sectors. He provides input to the two managers, who select the stocks for inclusion in the portfolio.
The pervasive theme in the portfolio is equity income. There are only subsets of companies in the North American markets that pay dividends; potential investments are screened and are limited to those companies that are paying or have a history of growing their dividends. Occasionally, the managers may purchase a company that is not yet paying a dividend, but which is expected to in the near future. Currently, 100% of the portfolio is invested in companies that have a history of paying a dividend, and substantially all have guided that dividends will increase over time. Typically, portfolio companies have dividend yields higher than 2% and investment decisions are contingent on them having an attractive relative valuation.
Screens are used extensively in the bottom-up stock selection process – dividend yield is first; however, high-yield companies are not automatically included in the portfolio. Lead manager Orrico has been running income portfolios for more than 20 years and says he understands the pitfalls of reaching for yield. He is more comfortable investing in a company with an attractive business paying a 2.5% dividend yield than a ‘bad’ company paying a much higher yield. There is a company in the portfolio on a 7-8% yield, but Orrico argues that the stock is mispriced. Potential investments are also screened for balance sheet strength; excessive debt is viewed as an impediment to the payment of dividends – a company needs a comfortable level of free cash flow to cover dividends. Other metrics include a focus on the payout ratio after the deduction of sustainable capex.
Prior to investment, the managers meet with the management of potential portfolio holdings, either face to face or via a call to discuss areas not covered in public documents; trying to gain a better understanding of their strategies. When meeting with an energy company, for instance, discussions centre on their dividend policy (whether it will be maintained or increased), how capital is being allocated between different projects, how this ties in with MCT’s macro view of commodity prices, and plans for the level of debt and what the proceeds will be used for. It is important to have an understanding of the potential internal rates of return for capital allocation projects and whether this will lead to higher future dividend growth. Discussions with industrial companies may include an assessment of the competitive environment, new product pipelines, management succession planning and control procedures in place – MCT’s managers do not want nasty surprises from financial misstatements.
The managers believe that interest rates will remain low for the foreseeable future. Hence, there is significant demand for stable cash flow-producing businesses like oil & gas pipelines and REITs, which they consider attractive. However, they typically invest in companies with market caps above C$1bn; liquidity is viewed as very important as the managers want the ability to reduce exposure quickly if a permanent impairment is identified at a company.
MCT’s research goes beyond using screens, with third-party resources used for areas of the market that are seen as too complex for a generalist portfolio manager. Healthcare is a very complex industry, where current issues include debates surrounding predatory drug pricing, the Affordable Care Act and its impact on Medicaid and hospitals. MCT works on an exclusive basis with third-party firms (meaning it is the only Canadian money manager these firms work with), which provide insight and views on complicated industries. In healthcare, MCT uses Sector & Sovereign Research (SSR), whose co-founder Dr Richard Evans is a highly regarded, ex-Sanford Bernstein analyst with a proprietary method to analyse the drug pipelines of big pharma companies.
In the energy sector, MCT works with Groppe, Long & Littell, which has a proprietary methodology to forecast oil and gas prices. This is tough to accomplish accurately, as the industry has a lot of moving parts. As a result of shale production in recent years, the US is now as large an energy producer as Saudi Arabia. Orrico argues that people did not see the change coming because they did not understand the oil production technology.
There are team members at Middlefield covering other parts of the market, such as the energy/infrastructure team based in Calgary. If MCT’s managers decide they want to increase exposure to these sectors, they will speak to the team to understand their top picks in these areas.
Some companies have had uninterrupted inclusion in the portfolio since MCT’s inception, such as Canadian oil & gas producer ARC Resources. If the managers believe that companies are properly run and pass the screens, there is no reason to sell, even during periods of stock market gyrations. Macro views may drive portfolio activity – for example, if the managers decide that oil is out of favour, they might reduce the oil weighting from 20% to 5% of the portfolio, and so what is a 3% individual holding may now become a 1% position. High-quality companies are likely to be trimmed rather than sold as it is hard to predict a turnaround in investor sentiment.
The largest risk control in place is diversification of the portfolio via sector and securities. Sector diversification was historically difficult given the dominance of the oil and gas stocks among the dividend payers, but there is no longer outsized sector exposure; no more than 20-25% of the portfolio is invested in a particular sector. The investment policy requires that no holding in the portfolio should have a lower than 1% weighting, as this would not be meaningful to performance. A maximum position size is typically 4.0-4.5%; any position sizes higher than this are a result of the outperformance of a particular investment rather than a willingness to hold a position >4.5% of the portfolio. The larger-cap focus of the fund also acts as a risk control, as larger caps are typically less volatile and more liquid. There are no private companies in the portfolio given their illiquidity.
Current portfolio positioning
As at end-September 2016, the top 10 positions accounted for 36.5% of the portfolio, a modest decrease in concentration from 38.3% at end-September 2015. One of the largest holdings in the fund is Chartwell Retirement Residences REIT. Floated in 2003, it is now the largest retirement home operator in Canada by a factor of two, operating across the spectrum from nursing, to assisted living to life care. MCT has held a position in Chartwell for a very long time. The company had growing pains in its early years as a public company but has thrived since Brent Binions, one of the company’s founders, became CEO. It expanded operations in the US when the Canadian and US currencies were at par, but sold the business as the outlook for growth deteriorated. By then the US dollar had strengthened against the Canadian dollar, so the sale was viewed as an astute move. Chartwell has low levels of debt and a stable dividend. It can grow organically or via accretive acquisitions. It has a variety of retirement homes under development, which should generate high internal rates of return; this is a differentiating feature versus other REITs, which tend to buy fully developed, fully leased properties. The manager considers that if an institution wanted to get into the retirement property segment, Chartwell itself may become a takeout candidate.
Another large holding within the portfolio is Canadian pipeline company Enbridge; it is one of the highest-quality pipeline companies in North America. It has a current market cap of c C$55bn and has recently announced the acquisition of US company, Spectra Energy (pre-bid market cap c $25bn). If approved, the merger will create the largest North American energy infrastructure company. There was a favourable investor reaction to the deal; Enbridge’s stock actually rallied from C$52 before the deal to C$59 on the news, so this was indicative of the market’s positive view of the transaction. Enbridge is already a dominant player in the industry, shipping oil from Canada to the US, and is looking to expand, with a significant pipeline of new projects that will be built out over time.
Exhibit 4: Asset mix as at 30 September 2016 (% unless stated)
Asset |
Portfolio end-September 2016 |
Portfolio end-September 2015 |
Change (pts) |
Canadian equity |
70.3 |
53.7 |
16.6 |
US equity |
24.6 |
37.9 |
-13.3 |
Fixed income |
5.1 |
8.4 |
-3.3 |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Source: Middlefield Canadian Income, Edison Investment Research
Up to 40% of the portfolio may be invested outside Canadian equities. This allows exposure to businesses that are underrepresented in Canada. Over the past 12 months the percentage of the portfolio invested in the US has declined. Exposure had been increased due to a challenging Canadian economy since the beginning of the oil price slump in summer 2014; however, the Canadian economy has stabilised as the oil price has rallied. The manager believes that sentiment towards Canadian equities will continue to improve given a better domestic economy and economic and political instability in other developed markets such as the UK and Europe.
As shown in Exhibit 4, a small percentage of the portfolio is invested in fixed-income securities. This provides an element of stability to the fund over time. There are currently six holdings, the largest of which is Quebecor 6.625%, due on 15 January 2023.
A recent new holding in the portfolio is US major pharma company Bristol-Myers Squibb, added after conversations with SSR. Its Opdivo drug failed in a trial as a first-line treatment for lung cancer, and its stock price fell significantly. The market believed this was a permanent impairment, but SSR’s proprietary analysis suggests it will be a short-term phenomenon; the belief is that, in combination with other treatments, the drug will be effective over the longer term. The manager believes that it may take a quarter or two before Bristol-Myers Squibb’s share price recovers.
Another recent purchase is National Bank of Canada. It is one of the six major Canadian banks, trading at a discount to its peers on both a forward P/E multiple and price-to-book basis. It has an attractive dividend yield of 4.7%. There were concerns about its energy loan book; however, as the industry has now stabilised, this has proved to be a non-issue. Therefore, loan loss reserves will likely come back into earnings, which will provide a tailwind to the stock price. When interest rates do rise, National Bank’s profitability will improve due to higher net interest margins.
US-listed fertiliser stock, CF Industries, has also been added to the portfolio at a dividend yield of 5%. The manager expects the fertiliser market to trough over the next 12-24 months and the industry is consolidating – Potash Corporation has recently announced its intension to merge with Agrium. CF has undergone a massive capacity expansion programme, which is now essentially complete. This should lead to higher free cash flow generation that can be returned to shareholders either via share repurchases or higher dividends.
Exhibit 5: Portfolio sector exposure vs benchmark (% unless stated)
|
Portfolio end-Sept 2016 |
Portfolio end-Sept 2015 |
Change (pts) |
Index weight |
Active weight vs index (pts) |
Fund weight/ index weight (x) |
Pipelines, power & utilities |
21.2 |
9.6 |
11.6 |
25.4 |
-4.2 |
0.8 |
Real estate |
19.7 |
10.7 |
9.0 |
14.0 |
5.7 |
1.4 |
Energy |
14.5 |
0.9 |
13.6 |
4.9 |
9.6 |
3.0 |
Financials |
12.6 |
25.9 |
-13.3 |
30.3 |
-17.7 |
0.4 |
Materials |
7.6 |
5.3 |
2.3 |
9.4 |
-1.8 |
0.8 |
Industrials |
5.1 |
13.9 |
-8.8 |
1.0 |
4.1 |
5.1 |
Bonds & conv. debentures |
5.1 |
8.4 |
-3.3 |
0.0 |
5.1 |
N/A |
Consumer discretionary |
4.2 |
7.7 |
-3.5 |
3.9 |
0.3 |
1.1 |
Healthcare |
3.6 |
4.0 |
-0.4 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
N/A |
Technology |
2.9 |
4.8 |
-1.9 |
0.9 |
2.0 |
3.2 |
Consumer staples |
2.2 |
8.4 |
-6.2 |
0.3 |
1.9 |
7.3 |
Other |
1.3 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
N/A |
Telecommunications |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
10.1 |
-10.1 |
0.0 |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
|
Source: Middlefield Canadian Income, Edison Investment Research
Looking at sector exposure in Exhibit 5, the four largest comprise c 70% of the portfolio. These sectors represented c 50% 12 months ago and include significant dividend-paying stocks; exposures are tilted depending on the manager’s macro views.
REITs represent the largest individual industry exposure within the portfolio; the focus is on large, liquid issuers that have a dominant market position. The industry is a beneficiary of continued low interest rates and is experiencing a positive demand/supply balance. Real estate is typically viewed as a commodity (negatively affected by too much supply or too little demand); however, with limited supply available and strong demand, industry fundamentals are attractive. Even if interest rates do rise, the manager believes that REITs will continue to perform well, as higher interest rates are an indication of an improving economy, which will mean higher rents, leading to higher free cash flow and dividends. In addition, since the beginning of September 2016 real estate (previously a subset of financials) has had its own Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) level 1 category, which will require some portfolio managers to add exposure to the sector.
Over the last 12 months, exposure to the industrials sector has been reduced. This includes the sale of Magna (auto parts). Shares were purchased a number of years ago across several Middlefield funds. There has been a recovery in North American auto sales, which are now running at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of c 17m; the manager thinks the number could plateau at this level. Also, there is now more discussion about self-drive vehicles, which adds an element of the unknown to the industry.
Consumer discretionary exposure has also been reduced. MCT still has holdings in Gildan (leisure wear) and Enercare (consumer services), which have been in the portfolio for some time. The position in Starbucks was sold; it was purchased for its attractive valuation and well-known brand. However, the manager did not expect near-term upside in the stock and used the sale proceeds to invest in a higher-conviction position.
The telecommunications sector is a significant percentage of the benchmark, but is absent from the portfolio, a stance the managers have maintained for several years. The sector has performed well in 2016 in a volatile market environment as investors have sought defensive exposure, but Orrico stresses that his concerns remain. He views the stocks as very expensive, and competition is increasing as the government is focused on bringing new entrants into the market, which creates risks for the incumbents.