■
The hotel industry is highly cyclical and dependent on the global economy. PPHE competes for a share of disposable consumer income, which may be eroded by economic downturn.
■
Geopolitical events and natural disasters can have a significant impact on profitability. The company maintains a diverse guest nationality mix to minimise this risk. Consolidation of Croatian interests has brought a reshaping of business and seasonality.
■
Although the chairman and chief executive have material influence over the company (c 43% holding), a strategic goal of broadening the investor base has been effected by the move to a stock exchange Premium Listing and enhanced free float of over 50%, which qualifies for inclusion in the FTSE UK series of indices.
■
PPHE is significantly reliant on its relationship with Radisson Hotel Group. However, termination of its territorial licence by Radisson Hotel Group is possible only in very limited circumstances and in any case the relationship remains strong.
■
Much of the company’s cost base is fixed. This risk can be mitigated by effective yield management and the development of as flexible a business model as possible.
■
An active development programme may tie up balance sheet capacity and lead to asset write-downs if they fail. Growth depends on the availability of suitable sites and access to funding.
■
There is exchange rate exposure. There is also a debt financing and interest rate risk. A guaranteed yield to owners of units at Westminster Bridge may not be covered by net income from those units, although its proven trading strength suggests this is unlikely.
■
Tightening labour markets partly mitigated by focus on award-winning learning and development initiatives, apprenticeships and in-sourcing.
Valuation: UK/Netherlands portfolio at attractive yield
PPHE’s current share price is markedly below its last reported EPRA NAV per share of £24.57. We have thus analysed whether this discount to NAV is justified by the location of PPHE's assets and the fact that the company is not a pure-play property investor as it manages hotels and operates some under operating lease agreements. From a valuation perspective, we believe it is instructive to examine the average capitalisation yield on PPHE’s property portfolio implied by the current share price. This is an important parameter for investors as it measures the attractiveness of PPHE’s current market valuation from the perspective of hotel earnings afforded by the company. Our first step is to estimate hotel net operating income (NOI), based on reported 2018 group EBITDAR excluding earnings from the management and central services division. We adjust as follows:
■
add back the earnings lost due to renovations and subsequent ramp up in 2018 (eg with regard to Sherlock Holmes and several other properties in the UK, Netherlands and Germany);
■
subtract earnings attributable to the 48% minority stake in Arena;
■
eliminate EBITDA of hotels under operating leases (although we estimate not material) but note the minor benefit from termination of the loss-making lease for art’otel dresden from July 2018;
■
apply a furniture, fixture and equipment (FF&E) reserve in line with industry standards (and PPHE’s assumptions) at 4% of hotel revenues; and
■
subtract financial lease expenses (the company leases certain land and properties in London under agreements longer than 100 years) as well as expenses related to the income units in Westminster Bridge, arriving at adjusted NOI of c £66m (see Exhibit 4).
Exhibit 4: PPHE’s FY18 NOI calculations (£m unless otherwise stated)
EBITDAR by region 2018 |
|
UK |
66.8 |
Netherlands |
14.2 |
Germany and Hungary |
9.0 |
Croatia |
19.7 |
Group EBITDAR 2018 (ex management and central services) |
109.7 |
Adjustments for: |
|
Refurbishments / ramp up |
2.2 |
Assets under operating lease |
0.1 |
Arena minorities |
(14.1) |
Adjusted 2018 group EBITDAR |
97.9 |
FF&E reserve |
(10.6) |
as % of total adjusted 2018 group revenue |
4% |
Financial lease expenses |
(8.7) |
Expenses related to units in Westminster Bridge |
(12.3) |
Share in result of joint ventures |
0.1 |
Net operating income |
66.4 |
Source: Edison Investment Research, PPHE accounts
Our next step is to divide NOI by the implied value of PPHE’s hotel properties based on the current share price. To arrive at the latter, we take the market cap and add the last-reported net debt figure (at December 2018) after excluding the proportion attributable to Arena minority shareholders. We have also excluded PPHE’s non-real estate assets and liabilities (net working capital items in particular) and the value of the Hoxton project (£82.5m according to the recent valuation by Savills).
To conclude, we have estimated the value of PPHE’s hotel management business to isolate the value of its hotel properties. These activities are represented by the management and central services division, which generated £42m revenue (before eliminations) and £10.3m EBITDA in 2018. We have valued the business using a DCF method based on a WACC (calculated separately for each year) of 7.3–7.8% and a terminal growth rate of 1.5%, arriving at a fair value of £161m. We have allowed for art’otel hoxton but not for the two new art’otel management contracts. This clearly illustrates that the management business represents incremental value on top of the NAV of PPHE’s properties.
As a sense check to our DCF valuation of management and central services, we have conducted a comparative valuation based on global peers with relatively asset-light models, including Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, IHG, AccorHotels, Marriott and Hilton. Our estimated average EV/EBITDAR ratio adjusted for capitalised operating lease liabilities for this peer group is 14.4x for 2018 (used in the absence of available EBITDAR consensus). When applying this multiple to PPHE’s management and central services division’s 2018 EBITDA (adjusted for refurbishments and asset ramp up), we arrive at a fair value of £152m. We acknowledge that our selected peers possess a much stronger brand and market presence than PPHE. However, as our DCF-derived fair value also captures growth prospects associated with the new management contracts, we include the average for both methods in our yield calculations at £156.2m (360p per PPHE share, see Exhibit 5).
Exhibit 5: PPHE’s implied real estate value calculations (£m unless otherwise stated)
Implied real estate value calculations |
|
PPHE share price (p) |
1,690 |
Diluted number of shares (m) |
42.86 |
Market cap |
724.3 |
Net debt (adjusted for minorities) at December 2018 |
472.1 |
Adjustments for: |
|
Hoxton development project |
(82.5) |
Net non-real estate (assets)/liabilities |
1.4 |
Management and central services valuation |
(156.2) |
Implied real estate value |
951.7 |
Implied capitalisation yield (%) |
7.0 |
Source: Edison Investment Research, PPHE accounts
Therefore we obtain an implied capitalisation yield of 7.0%. We estimate the prevailing weighted average prime capitalisation yield in the property markets where the company operates is c 5% and thus visibly below PPHE’s implied capitalisation yield, suggesting the market is not fully reflecting the value of the company’s properties.
Given the lack of European listed hotel REITs, we also compare PPHE’s implied yield to the average levels for US hotel REITs focused on upscale and upper scale segments. Our calculations (summarised in Exhibit 6) indicate these peers trade at an average implied capitalisation yield of 8.0%, which is slightly higher than our estimate for PPHE.
Exhibit 6: Implied capitalisation yield for selected US hotel REITs
|
Share price (US$) |
NOI * (US$000s) |
Implied real estate value** (US$000s) |
Implied cap yield |
Ashford Hospitality Trust |
4.9 |
408,811 |
4,728,686 |
8.6% |
Apple Hospitality REIT |
16.6 |
423,609 |
5,112,279 |
8.3% |
Condor Hospitality Trust |
9.1 |
25,036 |
248,284 |
10.1% |
Chesapeake Lodging Trust |
28.4 |
166,705 |
2,422,534 |
6.9% |
DiamondRock Hospitality Company |
10.9 |
245,490 |
3,245,380 |
7.6% |
Hersha Hospitality Trust |
17.3 |
136,789 |
2,119,715 |
6.5% |
Summit Hotel Properties |
11.6 |
183,250 |
2,364,725 |
7.7% |
RLJ Lodging Trust |
17.9 |
487,960 |
5,399,332 |
9.0% |
Sunstone Hotel Investors |
14.6 |
293,174 |
3,880,148 |
7.6% |
Average |
- |
- |
- |
8.0% |
Source: Company filings, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Estimated based on FY18 hotel EBITDA and an FF&E reserved calculated as 4% of FY18 hotel revenue. **Based on market capitalisation at 4 April 2019 and net debt, preferred equity and net working capital at December 2018.
However, we note there are considerable differences in market yields between London (about two-thirds of PPHE’s portfolio value at end 2018) and major central business district locations in the US. The average national-level capitalisation rate in full service segments stood at 7.68% in H218, according to a recent capitalisation rate survey conducted by CBRE. This compares with a prime yield of 4.05% for London according to GVA’s UK Hotel Market Outlook in autumn 2018.
An alternative way to look at PPHE’s valuation is to examine its return on EPRA NAV of £24.57 per share as implied by the company’s EPRA EPS, which was just 4.6% at end 2018. However, we note that PPHE’s EPRA NAV includes the Hoxton project, which has yet to generate profit. Moreover, PPHE has a high cash balance while looking for projects for acquisition. The company estimates that after adjusting for these, the return on EPRA NAV is 5.6%. We also note that PPHE’s 2018 figure was affected by renovations. Based on our EPRA EPS forecasts and assuming a flat EPRA NAV, the return increases to 6.0% in 2020 and 6.7% in 2021. Indeed, since the current share price is below EPRA NAV per share, we have also calculated the implied return on the market cap (based on the company’s adjustments for excess cash and Hoxton project), which stands at 9.1% based on 2018 earnings. This confirms our conclusions from implied capitalisation yield analysis.
Based on the above calculations as well as Savills/Zagreb Nekretnine’s EPRA NAV estimate, we may conduct a sum-of-the-parts valuation (see Exhibit 7). After adjusting for net debt, minorities and non-real estate assets, we obtain a value of 2,807p per share. Importantly, these calculations are based on the assumption that the market is applying no discount to the NAV valuation of the properties. However, we acknowledge that US hotel REITs are trading now at a discount to NAV of around 5–20%. Therefore, if we were conservatively to apply a 20% discount to PPHE’s net property value, we would arrive at 2,318p, which still provides material upside to the share price.
Exhibit 7: PPHE’s SOTP valuation (£m, unless otherwise stated)
|
|
Savills/Zagreb Nekretnine’s valuation (at end 2018) |
1,670.1 |
Net debt adjustment |
(479.6) |
Minorities adjustment |
(142.2) |
Management and central services division value (Edison estimate) |
156.2 |
Net non-real estate assets/(liabilities) |
(1.4) |
PPHE valuation |
1,203.2 |
Number of shares |
42.86 |
PPHE value per share (£) – assuming no discount |
28.07 |
PPHE value per share (£) – @ 20% discount |
23.18 |
Source: Company accounts, Savills, Zagreb Nekretnine, Edison Investment Research
Finally, we have applied a propco-opco method to analyse PPHE’s value by conducting a hypothetical split into a pure property investor (propco) and an entity operating the hotels under a lease agreement (opco). We have assumed the propco value is in line with PPHE’s last reported EPRA NAV at £24.57, while the opco value was derived from a DCF model on the following assumptions: 1) average rental rate across the property portfolio of 5.5%; 2) asset value at £1,670.1m (in line with Savills/Zagreb Nekretnine’s last valuation); 3) no capex at the opco level; 4) no debt at the opco level, in line with the current status (all debt at property level); 5) WACC equal to cost of equity at 6.6–7.2%; and 6) a terminal growth rate of 1.5%. Therefore we obtain a positive opco value of £1.86 per share, which with the property value translates into a total valuation of £26.43 per share. We believe our rental rate assumption is prudent, with recent fixed income investment deals in the UK property market completed at a yield of 3.3–5.0%. For our sensitivity analysis, we have estimated the rental rate translating into the opco value at null is c 5.8%.
In summary, our implied capitalisation yield analysis and the SOTP valuation indicate that PPHE’s discount to EPRA NAV is not justified by its management business (which we believe to be a clear value contributor), while activities on operating leases are negligible in terms of valuation. This is confirmed by our propco-opco analysis, which suggests the valuation of a standalone hotel operator (which does not own the properties but uses under operating leases) would still be positive.
We understand that PPHE’s EPRA NAV (£24.57, which forms the basis of our valuation analysis) estimated by Savills and Zagreb Nekretnine is based on future cash flows generated by the respective properties and thus captures the prospective increase in hotel operating income following the recent refurbishments. As a result, if we exclude the impact of the Hoxton project ramp up and acquisitions of new projects, PPHE’s EPRA NAV should remain broadly stable or grow at a low rate (implied purely by the time value of money) over the next few years. Having said that, we believe that the market is not fully capturing the existing value of PPHE’s properties (as discussed in our valuation analysis), which implies solid upside to the current share price.
Asset quality review
We have further decided to examine if PPHE’s property portfolio may be considered ‘prime’ in terms of location and asset quality. This would confirm our statement that its current implied capitalisation yield of 7.2% seems high relative to prevailing prime yields in the market. This in turn would suggest that PPHE’s property value implied by the current share price is below its actual market value as estimated by Savills and Zagreb Nekretnine.
The company’s upscale portfolio consists of eight hotels in London (Plaza on the River and Riverbank treated separately despite the same address), of which two (Waterloo and Park Royal) are recent openings (2017) and one (Riverbank) has been substantially extended and repositioned. In addition, the repositioning of Sherlock Holmes should complete in May 2019. While Park Royal is more characteristic of a busy UK regional hotel than a central site, it is especially well located next to the largest industrial and business estate in the UK (2,000+ businesses) and close to Wembley Stadium, SSE Arena and Westfield London, the biggest shopping centre in Europe. Exposure to UK regional UK (Leeds and Nottingham) is modest (c 4% of group hotel rooms). In the Netherlands PPHE owns four hotels in Amsterdam, including landmark Victoria, newly repositioned, and Vondelpark, transformative refurbishment almost complete. Repositioning is also underway at Utrecht. Significant ownership interests in Germany include three hotels in Berlin (one earmarked for major renovation), Nuremberg (2016) and Cologne.
By contrast, operations in Croatia are in leading tourist region, Istria. Properties are a mix of hotels, holiday apartment complexes and campsites and trading is highly seasonal. Hotel classification varies from upscale Histria to budget-friendly Brioni (heritage site, to reposition by 2022), while accelerating development of campsites is highlighted by the introduction of glamping.
As most properties are in prime locations and well invested, we believe PPHE constitutes a good entry point for exposure to the London and Netherlands property market at an attractive yield level.