Reporting in euros for the first time, Renewi's H119 results showed a strong turnaround In Municipal performance, a similar Commercial EBIT outturn y-o-y, offset by flagged permit issues at ATM in the Hazardous division and mixed trading among Monostreams operating companies. The cash flow and period-end net debt position were better than earlier management expectations and the interim dividend was maintained. We show the scale of each of Renewi’s four divisions, together with profitability and performance relative to H118, in Exhibit 1 below.
Exhibit 1: Renewi divisional & interim splits
€m |
H1 |
H2 |
2018 |
H1 |
|
% chg y-o-y |
Group Revenue |
890.4 |
888.7 |
1,779.1 |
900.4 |
|
1.1% |
Commercial Waste |
574.6 |
583.6 |
1158.2 |
586.3 |
|
2.0% |
Hazardous Waste |
117.3 |
113.6 |
230.9 |
108.0 |
|
-7.9% |
Monostreams |
102.4 |
102.0 |
204.4 |
110.5 |
|
7.9% |
Municipal |
112.3 |
107.0 |
219.3 |
113.4 |
|
1.0% |
Services/Interco |
(16.2) |
(17.6) |
(33.8) |
(17.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Operating Profit |
49.5 |
29.0 |
78.5 |
44.8 |
|
-9.6% |
Commercial Waste |
41.1 |
32.2 |
73.3 |
40.5 |
|
-1.5% |
Hazardous Waste |
15.7 |
4.2 |
19.9 |
5.9 |
|
-62.4% |
Monostreams |
10.8 |
7.4 |
18.2 |
8.8 |
|
-18.5% |
Municipal |
(5.6) |
(5.0) |
(10.6) |
4.3 |
|
-177.1% |
Services/Central |
(12.5) |
(9.8) |
(22.3) |
-14.7 |
|
|
The divisions shown above operate with different business models and have distinct market exposures. For example, Commercial Waste (continental Europe, predominantly the Netherlands and Belgium) and Municipal (UK and Canada) revenues are substantially derived from inbound local waste streams, while Monostreams is more dependent on the price/volume of processed waste sold. Hazardous shows a more even balance between activity carried out on customer premises (this is entirely Reym, we believe) and its own (a combination of Reym and ATM). These model differences are summarised in Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2: Renewi H119 divisional split by revenue source
€m |
Commercial |
Hazardous |
Monostreams |
Municipal |
Inter-company |
Total |
Revenue |
586.3 |
108.0 |
110.5 |
113.4 |
-17.8 |
900.4 |
Inbound |
83% |
45% |
27% |
86% |
99% |
72% |
Outbound |
12% |
3% |
72% |
3% |
1% |
17% |
Onsite |
4% |
52% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
9% |
Other |
0% |
0% |
1% |
11% |
0% |
2% |
Source: Company. Note: Inbound = fee received for treatment at Renewi facility. Outbound = sale of processed waste outputs (ie recyclates, energy). Onsite = fee received for treatment at customer’s site.
Compared to the previous corresponding six-month period, three of the four divisions experienced reductions in outbound waste income owing to weaker secondary markets – affected by China taking less paper and plastics. Monostreams was the exception, benefiting from increasing commercial arrangements for specific [high-quality] waste streams (eg closed loop vacuum recycling, digital printing). Additionally, three of the four divisions increased inbound fee income reflecting generally healthy activity levels. The high-profile exception to this was Hazardous, where a stop on selling thermally treated soil affected throughput (and also intake fees as site holding capacity filled). In the following sections, we now discuss individual divisional performance.
1. Commercial – stable sector, cost pressures
Netherlands operations account for just over 60% of this division and delivered a 3% y-o-y revenue increase and 1% in operating profit. In comparison, Belgium saw a flat top line and a 5% reduction in profitability. Market conditions were generally solid, with maintained to slightly better volumes and some incremental pricing benefits coming through, although lower y-o-y received paper and plastics recyclate prices constrained revenue development to some extent. There was slight margin erosion in the period, with higher disposal costs of residual waste especially contributing to this, due to tight market incinerator capacity. Belgium started the roll out of new, integrated collection routes during the period and the Netherlands is now underway also; there were limited incremental synergy benefits in H1, but more are anticipated in H2 and beyond.
2. Hazardous – good demand levels, performance compromised by timing issues
Both Reym (cleaning services for industrial equipment) and ATM (treatment of contaminated materials) faced challenges in H1. The step down in thermally treated soil volumes at ATM began in mid-FY18 and continues, pending a re-permitting of this process; dialogue with the national regulator and a collective of regional ones (which, broadly speaking, set technical standards and issue local soil use/re-use permits respectively) is ongoing. The treatment of waste water and chemicals is not affected and activity in these streams is also understood to have been robust. Oil and gas industry activity levels – Reym’s primary market – were described as good, although schedule changes leading to unrecovered overheads had a negative impact on profitability y-o-y. Reym is now considered to be non-core due to a lack of group fit and potential disposal is under active consideration
3. Monostreams – good segments outweighed by market challenges elsewhere
The companies servicing four independent waste recycling streams in this division experienced varying fortunes in H1. Orgaworld (processing organic waste into energy and secondary products) and Mineralz (incinerator bottom ash recycling and disposal) both traded well and saw good y-o-y volume progress. Waste electrical/electronic equipment recycling (Coolrec) and glass recycling operations (Maltha and van Tuijl) faced different market challenges, being inbound mix/volumes and secondary metals pricing in the former case and commercial outlets in the latter. In response to this and some operational issues, cost reduction activities have taken place in both areas. We read into this that they were the primary drag on the lower profit contribution generated from the division overall. By the same token, one would expect the actions taken to come through in improved performance in future periods.
4. Municipal – progress in both the UK and Canada
In the UK, a degree of change complicates a true l-f-l comparison with the prior year with exits from two facilities (Westcott Park and Cumbernauld), the then impending (now complete) exit from a third (Dumfries & Galloway), and onerous contract effects at Wakefield. Overall, reported UK revenues were maintained, which implies some improvement from ongoing facilities. Allowing for c €2m of one-off benefits from actions taken and €2m onerous contract accounting revisions explains a significant proportion of the y-o-y UK profit increase, but suggests there was underlying improvement also. We note that the full commissioning of the new Derby facility is running behind schedule and anticipate a further update on this before the year end. Operations in Canada are somewhat smaller than the UK, but H1 profitability was comparable and represented a turnaround from a loss-making position in H118. Each of the three facilities operated contributed to this, with a number of operational, contractual and business churn issues largely moving forward in a favourable way. The initial period of full service operation at the new Surrey biofuel facility appears to have gone well.
Core net debt edges higher, neutral underlying cash flow
Core group net debt of €496m at the end of September was in line with the level a year earlier and slightly below the €501m reported at the end of FY18. Integration and synergy generation cash costs relating to the Shanks/VGG merger were broadly in alignment with and balanced out by portfolio management activities.
Renewi’s EBITDA was c €93m in the first half and below the prior year level. Working capital was effectively a neutral line item (ie less than €1m outflow) consistent with a flat top line, and together these points indicate significant core cash flow generation. After taking into account significant cash flows associated with synergy and integration of c €19m and other outflows (including pension recovery cash), Renewi generated €68m trading cash inflow overall.
Interest and tax of €15m (largely the former, with cash tax likely to be H2 weighted) and net capex (€46.5m, including €2.3m intangibles relating to IT platform investment) running slightly ahead of depreciation were the primary other normal operating cash flow items. Other net business investment overall generated proceeds of c €19m; this effectively all came from the previously announced disposal of the company’s 50% stake in the Energen Biogas facility in Scotland, with other elements offsetting each other in aggregate. After paying the FY18 final dividend (c €19m) and the acquisition of shares for employee share schemes (c €1m), the core net cash inflow for H119 as a whole was c €5m.
Cash flow outlook: We expect to see a broadly similar, albeit slightly lower underlying trading cash flow performance in H2 compared to H1. This is partly seasonal and we have modelled some low-level working capital absorption in the period also. Exceptional cash costs of c €20m will be comparable to those seen in H1; half of this relates to integration/synergy activities and the other half contractually arises from the early termination of the Dumfries & Galloway agreement. Below this we have factored in higher capex levels (to over €110m for the full year, including spend on intangible assets). After all other normal line items (ie interest, tax and dividends), we project c €28m overall cash outflow in H2, which suggests an end-FY19 core net debt level of c €524m, or c 2.8x EBITDA generated in the year. As referenced earlier, two businesses (Reym and Municipal – Canada) have been earmarked for disposal, but our estimates – P&L and cash flow – will only be adjusted when any such deals are announced and/or completed. Beyond FY19, our model projects free cash inflow approaching €40m in FY20 (and c €11m at the net level after cash dividend payments), with a further step-up in FY21 with increased profitability and reduced cash exceptional spend being key contributors to this.
Total PFI/PPP (non-recourse) net debt: For the record, and excluded from the above commentary, total PFI/PPP (non-recourse) debt within Municipal special purpose vehicles stood at €90.5m at the end of H119 versus €94.5m six months earlier. The difference is explained by a €2.6m partial repayment of PFI/PPP vehicle loans and a favourable exchange rate movement (the euro strengthening against sterling). We assume neutral cash flows between the company and these vehicles in our estimates.