The portfolio: Long-term, bottom-up, diversified and valuation focused
The investment portfolio is managed with the aim of achieving long-term capital growth and a steadily increasing income. There is a strong focus on UK stocks (88% at end-2023), although there is flexibility to invest in overseas stocks, most usually exercised when there is no compelling UK equivalent. Holdings are spread across large, medium-sized and smaller companies, across a variety of activities, balancing the requirement for immediate income with the potential for capital growth. Reflecting the prospects of faster long-term growth in sales, earnings and dividends from mid-caps and small caps, these are significantly overweighted in the portfolio compared with the all-market benchmark. Selective holdings in larger companies can meet the needs for immediate income, albeit with the likelihood of slower growth, are more established and hence less ‘risky’, and for much of the time since the Brexit vote in 2016 have been preferred by investors for having more internationally focused businesses with less exposure to the UK economy.
Investment decisions are driven by bottom-up stock selection with a strong valuation overlay. Quite simply, across the broad equity market, the investment managers are seeking to identify well managed, high-quality companies with a strong competitive advantage in their chosen market segments, at attractive prices. With a focus on long-term returns, they are prepared to take a contrarian position and do not shy away from stocks that have fallen out of favour, perhaps because they have disappointed on earnings, have balance sheet issues, or there are concerns over management. Crucially, the managers do not invest on valuation alone and must be able to identify a resolution to whatever the issue may be and a route to growth in revenues, earnings and dividends.
Given the focus on stocks rather than index weightings, diversification of the portfolio holdings, by business activity, market capitalisation and risk profile, is deliberately targeted, to enhance the consistency of performance and protect capital over the long term. There are usually c 150 holdings in the portfolio with a maximum of 175. Further underlining the level of stock diversification within the portfolio, particularly among mid- and small-cap stocks, at the end of 2023, the top 10 holdings, nine of which are top 100 companies, represented 25% of the total portfolio and the other c 140 holdings c 75%.
Exhibit 12: Top 10 holdings
Company |
Sector |
Portfolio weight (%) |
Change since |
31-Dec-23 |
30-Jun-23 |
31-Dec-22 |
30-Jun-23 |
31-Dec-22 |
Rolls Royce |
Aerospace and defence |
3.9 |
3.2 |
0.99 |
0.7 |
2.9 |
Shell |
Oil and gas producers |
3.3 |
2.1 |
3.27 |
1.3 |
0.1 |
HSBC |
Banks |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.52 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
BP |
Oil and gas producers |
2.8 |
2.8 |
3.05 |
-0.1 |
-0.3 |
Rio Tinto |
Mining |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.44 |
0.2 |
-0.2 |
Marks & Spencer |
Consumer services |
2.3 |
1.7 |
0.97 |
0.6 |
1.3 |
Flutter Entertainment |
Travel and leisure |
2.2 |
2.7 |
1.96 |
-0.4 |
0.3 |
GlaxoSmithKline |
Pharmaceuticals |
2.1 |
2.1 |
2.24 |
0.0 |
-0.2 |
Barclays |
Banks |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.19 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
Senior |
Industrials |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.20 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
Total* |
|
25.2 |
23.2 |
20.8 |
2.0 |
4.4 |
Weight of actual top 10 holdings** |
|
25.2 |
23.2 |
22.8 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
Source: The Law Debenture Corporation. Note: *The total weighting in those stocks comprising the top 10 holdings at 31 December 2023. **The total weighting in the actual top 10 holdings at each point in time.
Exhibit 13 shows the overweighting to mid- and small-cap stocks and the underweighting of the very largest stocks. Compared with 2022, when the top 20 stocks were the only segment of the market to generate positive returns, performance by market segment was much less polarised in 2023. The 2022 total return of the AIM index was -6.4% compared with -30.5% in 2022.
Exhibit 13: Performance strongly skewed towards a handful of stocks
Market cap segment |
Performance |
LWDB weighting at 31 December 2023 |
UK market weighting at 31 December 2023 |
2023 |
2022 |
UK top 100 |
7.9% |
4.7% |
48.3% |
83.7% |
– of which top 20 share constituents |
3.5% |
15.7% |
23.7% |
55.1% |
– of which other 80 share constituents |
16.7% |
-17.2% |
24.6% |
28.6% |
UK mid-market |
7.9% |
-17.5% |
22.7% |
11.1% |
UK small cap |
6.7% |
-13.6% |
7.2% |
2.9% |
UK broad market |
7.9% |
0.3% |
78.2% |
2.2% |
Other UK* |
N/A |
N/A |
10.3% |
N/A |
Overseas |
N/A |
N/A |
11.3% |
N/A |
Source: LWDB, Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Other UK is predominantly AIM-listed stocks. In 2023 the AIM index total return was -6.4% and in 2022 it was 30.5%.
Sector weightings represent an output from stock selection rather than being a target in themselves, although they do show that the portfolio is tilted towards more cyclical stocks. In underlying terms, the portfolio holdings have an above average exposure to the domestic economy. More generally, the portfolio had an ungeared beta of 1.1 as at the end of 2023, which, combined with the trust’s use of gearing, would suggest likely outperformance in a rising market. Compared with the broad UK equity market, LWDB has a larger exposure to industrials (by c 14 percentage points), matched by a lower exposure to consumer sectors.
Exhibit 14: Sector exposure
|
Portfolio weight (%) |
Benchmark weight (%) |
Change in portfolio weight since (pp*): |
|
31-Dec-23 |
30-Jun-23 |
31-Dec-23 |
31-January 2024 |
31-Dec-23 |
30-Jun-23 |
Financials |
27.4 |
26.6 |
27.4 |
26.0 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
Industrials |
25.6 |
23.1 |
21.7 |
11.7 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
Energy |
10.3 |
10.9 |
10.9 |
10.8 |
(0.6) |
-0.6 |
Consumer goods |
7.8 |
10.3 |
7.7 |
14.4 |
(2.5) |
0.1 |
Basic materials |
6.0 |
6.7 |
8.7 |
7.1 |
(0.7) |
-2.7 |
Health care |
6.0 |
7.7 |
8.1 |
11.3 |
(1.7) |
-2.1 |
Consumer services |
10.4 |
7.4 |
9.0 |
12.5 |
3.0 |
1.4 |
Utilities |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.7 |
(0.1) |
-0.1 |
Telecommunications |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
1.1 |
(0.2) |
-0.1 |
Technology |
1.5 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
(0.5) |
0.2 |
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Source: The Law Debenture Corporation, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Percentage points.
Although the investment policy allows non-UK investment of up to 45%, the focus on UK equities has recently increased (from 84% in June 2023 to 88% at year-end). It is in the lowly valued UK market where the investment managers see the most attractive opportunities, particularly among domestic earners and especially in the mid- and small-cap segments.
Exhibit 15: Portfolio geographic exposure at 31 December 2023
|
Portfolio weight (%) |
Change since (%): |
Allocation guideline (%) |
|
31-Dec-23 |
30-Jun-23 |
31-Dec-22 |
30-Jun-23 |
31-Dec-22 |
UK |
88.2 |
83.8 |
83.2 |
4.4 |
5.0 |
55–100 |
North America |
3.2 |
5.5 |
5.1 |
-2.3 |
-1.9 |
0–20 |
Europe |
7.4 |
9.6 |
10.6 |
-2.2 |
-3.2 |
0–20 |
Japan |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0–10 |
Other Asia-Pacific |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0–10 |
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
|
Source: The Law Debenture Corporation, Edison Investment Research
Performance drivers in 2023
Compared with the highly polarised market of 2022, when from a market capitalisation perspective, the largest 20 stocks were the only area to deliver a positive total return, there are signs of a broadening out of returns in 2023.
Exhibit 16: Portfolio weightings and market performance by market cap segments
Performance by different market cap tiers |
Performance |
Market weighting |
LWDB weighting* |
UK top 100 |
3.2% |
84.1% |
48.5% |
– of which top 20 share constituents |
1.3% |
56.0% |
22.7% |
– of which other 80 share constituents |
7.2% |
28.1% |
25.8% |
UK mid-market |
-0.6% |
13.6% |
19.6% |
UK small cap |
0.7% |
2.2% |
5.6% |
UK broad market |
2.6% |
100.0% |
73.7% |
Junior market |
-8.5% |
N/A |
11.8% |
Overseas |
N/A |
N/A |
14.4% |
Source: The Law Debenture Corporation, Refinitiv
The top five stock portfolio gainers during 2023 included two ‘self-help’ recovery holdings, Marks & Spencer and Rolls Royce. Both have seen a recent change in management that has proved a catalyst for improved operational and financial performance and share price recovery. It is worth noting that Rolls Royce is yet to return to the dividend list and the Marks & Spencer yield is low. While the investment managers expect both to increase payouts over time, it would be difficult for a traditional income fund to hold significant positions in such stocks. Earlier in 2023 as their conviction in the investment increased, the investment managers had added to both Rolls Royce and Marks & Spencer, both of which are now large holdings, among the top 10.
The ongoing recovery in the aerospace market had a positive impact on Rolls Royce and also on aerospace components maker Senior. While HSBC generated significant appreciation based on the positive margin effects of rising interest rates, it was actually a detractor from the overall performance as LWDB’s position was less than the index weight. Hill & Smith is an industrial conglomerate with significant exposure to the growth in US infrastructure spending.
Exhibit 17: Top five gains in 2023
£m |
2022 valuation |
Purchases |
Sales |
Appreciation |
2023 valuation |
Rolls Royce |
8.8 |
3.2 |
|
25.2 |
37.3 |
Marks & Spencer |
8.6 |
1.6 |
|
11.6 |
21.8 |
HSBC |
22.4 |
|
|
5.2 |
27.6 |
Hill & Smith |
7.8 |
|
|
4.9 |
12.7 |
Senior |
10.7 |
|
|
4.4 |
15.1 |
Total |
58.3 |
4.8 |
0.0 |
51.4 |
114.4 |
Source: The Law Debenture Corporation
Within the top five losses, Anglo American was negatively affected by some challenging operating conditions, particularly for diamonds, as well as some self-inflicted issues such as material downgrades to its copper production targets. Its ability to benefit from decarbonisation and the supply of copper for use in electric vehicles and renewable energy is key to the investment rationale, along with the company’s leadership within the mining sector on environmental targets. It was on this basis that LWDB added to its position during the first half of 2023.
Although the share price has been weak in the past two years, Ceres Power remains one of the top contributors to LWDB’s performance over five years. The managers took profits into the strong rise in the share price and valuation in 2020, but remained positive about the long-term growth prospects and were rebuilding the position on price weakness during 2023. They expect the company’s fuel cell technology to play an important role in the move away from fossil fuels, but in the past year investors were disappointed by slower than hoped for progress with large licensing deals.
A normalisation of many commodity prices following the Ukraine war-inspired spike, including natural gas, had a negative impact on i3 Energy and Indus Gas.
NatWest failed to benefit from the positive impact of higher interest rates on banking margins and was negatively affected by the ‘de-banking’ affair and subsequent departure of the CEO.
Exhibit 18: Top five losses in 2023
£m |
2022 valuation |
Purchases |
Sales |
Depreciation |
2023 valuation |
Anglo American |
14.5 |
2.2 |
|
(5.9) |
10.8 |
Ceres Power |
7.9 |
4.5 |
|
(5.6) |
6.9 |
i3 Energy |
7.7 |
|
|
(4.1) |
3.6 |
NatWest |
17.2 |
|
|
(3.0) |
14.3 |
Indus Gas |
4.2 |
|
|
(3.0) |
1.2 |
Total |
51.6 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
(21.5) |
36.7 |
Source: The Law Debenture Corporation
In terms of new investments, the managers have highlighted stocks such as Workspace and Shaftesbury in the real estate sector and insurer Beazley, each with leadership positions in chosen markets.
Workspace is a well-established business with a strong record of growth in providing flexible office space in and around London. Shaftesbury owns a portfolio of prime properties in London’s West End. In both cases the shares were trading at a material discount to NAV while operating trends (such as rental values) have remained encouraging.
Beazley writes insurance across a range of end markets and has been a leader in the development of cyber breach insurance. At the time of purchase, it was trading on a lower-than-average valuation with good prospects to return excess capital in the form of increased dividends or share buy-backs.
When prices have been weak, the investment managers have continued to add to existing positions such as Marshalls, a building materials supplier, and Watkin Jones, a developer of build to rent residential properties and student accommodation. Both companies have long experience in their respective end markets and while trading conditions are currently challenging, the investment managers see a good potential for substantial earnings recovery on an improvement in demand.
Current valuation and performance metrics
In Exhibit 2 above we show a comparison of the LWDB share price total return performance versus its six larger peers within the AIC UK equity income sector.
In the table below we show a range of additional data and include a wider list of 20 sector constituents. The most recent Morningstar peer group data used are yet to reflect the uplift to the IPS fair value included in the final 2023 results (published 27 February 2024) and the increased annual DPS (to 32.0p). LWDB ranks very highly versus both close peers and the wider group on all measures other than dividend yield. The lower yield reflects the investment strategy of balancing immediate income returns with long-term capital growth, compensated for by much faster dividend growth and well-above average capital growth. Not surprisingly, LWDB’s discount to NAV is one of the lowest in the sector and the shares have traded at a modest premium for much of the past year.
Exhibit 19: Selected UK equity income peer group at 28 February 2024
Percentages unless stated otherwise |
Market cap (£m) |
NAV TR 1-year |
NAV TR 3-years |
NAV TR 5-years |
NAV TR 10-years |
|
Premium/ (discount) |
Ongoing charge |
Net gearing |
Dividend yield |
5-year div growth |
Law Debenture Corporation |
1,025 |
0.4 |
23.7 |
46.7 |
101.0 |
|
(3.5) |
0.5 |
114 |
4.1 |
11.1 |
City of London |
1,958 |
0.2 |
30.3 |
26.7 |
63.1 |
|
(1.8) |
0.4 |
107 |
5.2 |
2.6 |
Edinburgh Investment |
1,011 |
3.4 |
29.1 |
25.5 |
64.0 |
|
(10.1) |
0.5 |
108 |
4.0 |
(0.3) |
Finsbury Growth & Income |
1,639 |
2.4 |
15.8 |
28.8 |
118.0 |
|
(7.1) |
0.6 |
102 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
Murray Income Trust |
879 |
2.1 |
19.7 |
34.3 |
71.7 |
|
(9.5) |
0.5 |
107 |
4.6 |
2.4 |
Merchants Trust |
767 |
(8.3) |
27.4 |
35.7 |
60.5 |
|
(1.1) |
0.6 |
112 |
5.3 |
2.2 |
Temple Bar |
673 |
(1.3) |
24.3 |
12.4 |
41.2 |
|
(6.9) |
0.5 |
110 |
4.1 |
0.5 |
Average core |
1,154 |
(0.3) |
24.4 |
27.2 |
69.8 |
|
(6.1) |
0.5 |
108 |
4.2 |
2.0 |
LWDB core position |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
abrdn Equity Income Trust |
133 |
(14.5) |
1.7 |
(10.3) |
8.4 |
|
(5.0) |
0.9 |
114 |
8.2 |
3.5 |
BlackRock Income and Growth |
37 |
(1.2) |
22.5 |
26.4 |
67.8 |
|
(11.8) |
1.3 |
106 |
4.1 |
1.4 |
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust |
31 |
(14.7) |
(9.3) |
1.4 |
33.6 |
|
0.9 |
2.4 |
159 |
8.6 |
6.8 |
CT UK Capital and Income |
315 |
3.7 |
20.8 |
25.2 |
73.1 |
|
(3.5) |
0.7 |
107 |
4.0 |
2.1 |
CT UK High Income Units |
107 |
3.0 |
11.7 |
19.5 |
43.0 |
|
(6.7) |
1.0 |
112 |
4.9 |
2.5 |
Diverse Income Trust |
261 |
(7.4) |
(8.9) |
12.8 |
47.7 |
|
(5.7) |
1.1 |
97 |
5.0 |
3.6 |
Dunedin Income Growth |
397 |
3.0 |
13.3 |
35.8 |
66.1 |
|
(10.5) |
0.6 |
107 |
4.8 |
1.6 |
Invesco Select UK Equity |
105 |
1.2 |
25.6 |
33.3 |
74.7 |
|
(15.7) |
0.8 |
111 |
4.5 |
2.7 |
JPMorgan Claverhouse |
375 |
(0.8) |
15.7 |
23.2 |
54.5 |
|
(6.3) |
0.7 |
109 |
5.3 |
4.6 |
Lowland |
304 |
(3.0) |
15.9 |
14.1 |
33.3 |
|
(14.3) |
0.6 |
113 |
5.6 |
3.0 |
Schroder Income Growth |
183 |
(4.6) |
19.9 |
23.6 |
59.8 |
|
(9.0) |
0.8 |
115 |
5.2 |
3.2 |
Shires Income |
87 |
(5.5) |
10.9 |
24.2 |
62.0 |
|
(13.0) |
1.0 |
119 |
6.8 |
1.8 |
Troy Income & Growth |
161 |
4.8 |
14.6 |
13.3 |
59.4 |
|
(3.7) |
1.0 |
101 |
3.0 |
(5.6) |
All sector average |
522 |
(1.3) |
17.1 |
22.0 |
57.3 |
|
(10.3) |
0.8 |
111 |
5.1 |
1.6 |
LWDB all-sector position |
3 |
9 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
|
4 |
19 |
5 |
15 |
6 |
Source: Morningstar, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Performance based on cum-fair NAV. TR, total return. Net gearing is total assets less cash and equivalents as a percentage of net assets. LWDB calculates gearing as net borrowing as a percent of shareholders’ funds.
Law Debenture’s approach to ESG
LWDB approaches ESG issues in a variety of ways. On the investment side, the investment managers consider ESG matters as part of their fundamental analysis. They focus on the ability of companies to identify and manage key ESG issues and risks, especially those that may have a significant impact on their financial or operating performance. The investment team proactively engages with the senior management of companies to identify ESG issues and risks and to monitor progress with measures to address these. The approach to investment is not proscriptive and the managers will consider investment in companies with weaker ESG risk profiles, provided there is a process of improvement underway. At the same time, they are prepared to exit positions where the expected improvements are not delivered. Additionally, the investment managers continue to support companies, in many cases early stage, that provide innovative and immediate ESG benefits. We would particularly highlight investments in the renewable energy and sustainable building materials sectors.
In its oversight position, the board regularly reviews the portfolio’s ESG profile including recent engagement examples. As the quality and consistency of data that underlies ESG ratings systems evolves, this is likely to play an increasing role in investment policy.
While investment trusts would not normally have employees or physical infrastructure, this is not the case for LWDB with its IPS business. Many of the IPS operational areas are built upon the provision of independent governance services. Although this is relatively small, the firm monitors its carbon footprint and within the IPS business itself. The move to a new ‘green’ head office building in 2020 allowed for the digitisation of decades of paperwork and a move to new, more carbon efficient, paperless ways of working. Building on the experience of the pandemic, virtual meeting solutions are used where appropriate. As part of its commitment to the ESG agenda, LWDB has voluntarily chosen to adopt the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.
At the corporate level, LWDB has made significant progress in the areas of diversity and inclusion.