Company description: Energy storage solutions
Leclanché is a vertically integrated provider of energy management systems for the utilities, e-transport, commercial and industrial sectors. All of these are growing strongly, driven by a shift to decarbonised, decentralised and digitalised energy generation. Building on its century-long heritage of battery chemistry, CEO Anil Srivastava has transformed the company from one focused simply on sophisticated battery technology, to a business offering complete energy management systems that is able to compete successfully with global majors. This was amply demonstrated by winning the contract to supply and install the largest energy management system in the world to date, which is in Canada. The contract requires 53MWh of battery storage capacity and is worth US$45m. The group now addresses markets forecast by Navigant to grow at a 37-58% CAGR until 2025, reaching US$18bn in 2020.
Leclanché’s headquarters are in Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland, where battery module integration takes place. It has a large-format lithium ion cell manufacturing plant in Willstätt in Germany and a systems R&D hub in Turnhout, Belgium, which specialises in low-voltage mobility solutions. It employs over 150 staff, including around 50 people with engineering qualifications, around 40% of whom are engaged in software development. Depending on the scale and scope of the deployment, Leclanché sells systems through OEMs, distributors and direct to end-users. It already has a commercial presence in most countries in Europe, North America and Asia. For example, it opened its first North American office in April 2016 to build on its landmark win in Canada.
New strategy to deliver profitable growth
Exhibit 1: Vertically integrated energy management
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *Engineering, procurement and construction.
|
Under CEO Srivastava’s leadership, Leclanché has developed into a vertically integrated company, controlling all phases of implementation from design and manufacture of the battery cells to installation of complete systems. Prior to this transition, Leclanché was attempting to compete in the supply of battery cells with much larger companies that were able to achieve economies of scale, so margins were heavily compromised. Now the focus has changed to the delivery of complete systems. This changes the competitive environment (see below) as only one of the larger competitors, LG, is vertically integrated. It also gives Leclanché access to substantially more of the value chain. Battery cells are typically only 50% of the total value for a large energy storage system, engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) services are 12% and energy management systems are 6%. Software is a key element of the integrated offer, reflecting the more general trend of digitalisation in the energy industry. For example, Leclanché is developing a cloud-based asset operations software pack for managing both stationary energy storage systems and transport fleets such as electric buses, ferries and charging infrastructure. Neither Leclanché nor the larger battery manufacturers are active in power conversion systems, which account for another 23% of the value of a battery energy storage system (BESS).
First phase: Repositioning
The first phase of the turnaround is now complete. Through a succession of strategic partnerships and acquisitions, shown in Exhibit 2, combined with investment in the recruitment of software developers and other engineering staff, management has created a platform able to operate at each stage of the supply chain shown in Exhibit 1. In addition, Leclanché has become selective about the markets addressed and is now focused on high-growth segments where it should be possible to achieve higher margins through the provision of complete energy storage solutions and where there is the potential to sell significant volumes of batteries. As part of this process, Leclanché has added complementary G-NMC (graphite anode and nickel-manganese-cobalt cathode) technology, thus expanding its addressable market to include applications where the amount of energy stored per unit volume is critical. It has also increased production capacity so that it can supply the higher volumes required, delivering 30MWh in 2016 (c 0.6% of the global deliveries in the three target markets) compared with 5MWh in 2015. The strategy has been relatively successful, with the company completing reference projects in each of the new target segments within two years of launching the turnaround strategy. The strategy delivered a 56% increase in revenues during FY16. Growth slowed to 40% in H117 due to the lack of financing.
Exhibit 2: Strategic partnerships
Date |
Company |
Rationale |
May 2015 |
Visedo |
Collaboration combining Visedo’s electric drive trains with Leclanché’s battery systems to address e-transport applications |
May 2015 |
Litarion |
Agreement to supply G-NMC electrodes for incorporation into Leclanché’s lithium-ion batteries |
July 2015 |
Trineuron |
Acquisition to secure solution integration capability and customer-base in e-transport sector |
August 2015 |
ADS-tec |
Non-exclusive right to use battery management system for building battery modules and solutions for energy management of hybrid energy systems |
October 2016 |
SGEM |
Partnership to provide financing for projects with Leclanché acting as an EPC and OEM |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Second phase: Driving revenue and profit growth
Management is now addressing the second phase of the turnaround: delivering continued revenue growth and margin improvement. It has demonstrated conclusively that it can deliver large-scale projects, having delivered 30MWh of capacity during FY16. However, progress during H117 on large-scale projects was severely held back by lack of financing. The actions management is taking to secure funds for the group are discussed later in the Financials section. Management is also exploring options for financing individual large projects. Swiss Green Electricity Management (SGEM), which arranges financing for battery energy storage infrastructure, provided CHF8m equity towards a utility scale project in Chicago and a CHF15m construction loan towards the Canadian project. Management is in discussions with SGEM regarding finance to complete these two key projects. It is in discussions with other financial institutions to widen the pool of backers able to support other projects collectively requiring over US$100m. Since energy management and storage (other than pumped hydropower systems or utility-scale flywheels) is a relatively new technology, there are very few companies prepared to finance utility-scale energy storage systems. In this respect, the industry is similar to the infant solar power industry.
In parallel, management is implementing a programme to improve margins. Capacity has not been fully restored at the German cell manufacturing facility following the fire there in April 2016. Only batteries deploying Leclanché’s proprietary lithium titanate oxide (LTO) technology are manufactured there at present. G-NMC batteries are sourced from a supplier in Asia that enjoys sufficient economies of scale to be able to produce cells cost-effectively. Leclanché is currently working on cell efficiency improvements that will make the cells cost-competitive, so that it can resume in-house production in H118 as G-NMC demand ramps up. It also intends to join an Asian consortium that will give it access to the same raw materials sourcing prices as larger battery manufacturers. Other initiatives to improve margins (group gross margin was only 4.6% in H117) include bringing module assembly and testing in-house, and enhancing in-house software and systems integration capabilities so that more of the work on large projects can be delivered from in-house resources. Assuming that the ongoing financing programme completes successfully, management intends to acquire certain energy management software assets, which it estimates would enhance gross margin by 3.5 percentage points.
Management has instigated a restructuring of the operating businesses, which it expects to be complete by end FY17. It is creating two wholly owned subsidiaries: one focused on stationary storage activities, which will include commercial and industrial scale projects going forward; the other on e-transport activities, which will include automatic guided vehicles (AGVs), revenues attributable to which are currently included in the commercial and industrial segment. Management expects the combination of revenue and margin growth to result in a break-even situation at EBITDA level when deliveries exceed 100MWh/annum, which it anticipates reaching in late FY18/H119. Our estimates model deliveries of over 140MWh in FY18, generating CHF1.4m EBITDA.
Management has selected markets where the potential volume of storage required in the medium term is greatest. These are utility-scale generation and microgrids, e-transport and commercial and industrial buildings. Leclanché is able to address these multiple markets without incurring the cost of supporting multiple products because 80% of system elements – cell modules, battery management systems and drive train/inverters – are common across the sectors served, with customisation delivered through software and integration.
Exhibit 3: H117 revenues by sector
|
Exhibit 4: FY16 revenues by geography
|
|
|
Source: Leclanché data. Note: *Including CHF2.2m EU grant for e-transport application.
|
|
Exhibit 3: H117 revenues by sector
|
|
Source: Leclanché data. Note: *Including CHF2.2m EU grant for e-transport application.
|
Exhibit 4: FY16 revenues by geography
|
|
|
Utility-scale generation and microgrids (H117 revenue CHF1.4m, EBITDA loss CHF2.0m)
Industry analyst Navigant forecasts that the utility-scale generation and microgrids market will grow from 0.9GWh in 2016 to 4.2GWh in 2020, ie a 48% CAGR. Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicts a 49% CAGR over the same period. This is the most significant opportunity for Leclanché in the short to medium term because of the volumes of battery modules required for each project. A high proportion of Leclanché’s 115MWh order backlog relates to this sector.
Conventional gas, oil, coal or nuclear powered utility-scale power generation systems cannot respond quickly to changes in consumer demand, resulting in a mismatch between the output available and the amount required. The divergence between power generation output and consumer demand is more severe for countries where a significant proportion of electricity is generated from renewable sources. These have a continuously changing output, depending on intensity of cloud cover or wind strength. Historically utilities have addressed the mismatch by having additional power generation capacity on standby or storing energy in pumped hydro schemes or utility-scale flywheels. As the cost of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) is coming down, utilities are beginning to deploy these instead. A BESS is able to inject energy into the grid when there is a shortfall, replenishing it with energy from the grid when consumer demand is lower. It therefore helps to manage the amount of capacity in the grid ie providing reserve control. It also ensures that the electricity supplied is at the correct voltage and frequency, ie providing voltage control and frequency control, as both these properties deviate from their correct value if there is a mismatch between supply and demand. In addition, a major consumer of electricity can reduce costs by storing electricity provided on a cheap tariff in a BESS for use at peak times of demand when the tariff is higher (referred to as peak shaving). The operational costs and energy requirements of a BESS on standby are low compared to a conventional power station. In addition, a BESS is scalable, unlike a conventional power station, since its capacity can be easily increased by adding additional storage racks or containers. A BESS can be installed in six months, which is favourable when compared to several years for a conventional power station. Additionally a BESS can easily be moved to another location when required.
Energy storage is becoming increasingly important as a higher proportion of energy is generated from renewable sources. A report from Lux Research published in January 2016 predicted that distributed storage for solar systems would be worth US$8bn in 2026, noting that solar-plus-storage is a key necessity for solar to overcome limitations like intermittency and the lack of power after dark and that demand management software that integrates storage with photovoltaic production is already a key differentiator.
Leclanché is currently working on one of the world’s largest utility-scale stationary storage systems. This is a 53MWh system based on G-NMC technology located in Ontario, Canada. US$28.9m of the US$45.0m order relates to the BESS and associated power conversion system, the remainder to the engineering, procurement and construction work. Testing the installation at the two sites forming the first phase of the project is ongoing, with project completion scheduled for early FY18. In June 2016 Leclanché was selected as the EPC contractor and supplier of the battery energy storage system for a 10MWh grid-scale energy storage project in the Chicago area. In December 2016 Leclanché was awarded a contract related to a new 22MW BESS providing grid frequency control in North Germany. The first phase (2MW) is scheduled for delivery in Q417 on a build-own-operate transfer basis. Leclanché has an exclusivity arrangement with a major European utility for implementing the second phase (20MW). These three projects account for a meaningful share of the segment, estimated by Navigant to total 900MWh in 2016.
On some islands and other remote territories, connection to a main grid is either prohibitively expensive or impossible. Typically, energy is provided from diesel generators. This requires transportation of diesel fuel and high maintenance costs resulting in electricity that is four to 10 times more expensive than mains electricity. In addition the diesel generators are noisy and a source of air pollutants. These remote locations are increasingly deploying renewable sources to reduce diesel consumption, complementing these with BESSs to eliminate the mismatch between power output and consumer demand. Energy is taken from the BESS first, rather than activating the diesel generators for a short period or a small load, so the diesel generators can be used less frequently and when they are used, used more efficiently.
Leclanché is involved in the largest hybrid project so far in Europe, which is on the island of Graciosa in the Azores. The project, which has a combined cost of €8.5m, half of which is attributable to the BESS, includes a 3.2MWh LTO BESS, a solar photovoltaic plant and a wind park, all controlled by an energy management system. This project will enable the island to increase the proportion of energy generated from renewables from 15% to 65%. Leclanché’s scope of work included EPC for the battery park and consortium leadership for the project. Leclanché’s LTO technology was chosen as it is the only lithium-ion variant with a lifetime of 20 years, which matches that of the other energy infrastructure assets.
Revenues almost halved from CHF2.5m in H116 to CHF1.4m in H117 (CHF8.2m H216), as financing constraints have restricted Leclanché’s ability to progress existing projects. EBITDA losses reduced from CHF5.5m to CHF2.0m reflecting the cost saving measure taken in late FY16 and early FY17. Management expects this segment to be the principal driver of revenue growth during our forecast period. Our estimates assume 22MWh of installations during FY17, as work on ongoing projects is delayed by lack of financing, and 140MWh in FY18 (backed by completion of existing contracts and identified projects where the group is already in commercial discussions). This rises to 200MWh in FY19, which represents an estimated 7% of global installations. This is expected to drive segmental revenue growth from CHF15.0m in FY17e to CHF135.0m in FY19e. Our estimates model gross margin on hardware rising from 10% in FY17 to 20% in FY18, reflecting margin improvements associated with shipping higher volumes and improved cell efficiency. We model hardware gross margin remaining at 20% in FY19, assuming that pricing pressure is likely to offset further gains from higher volumes.
E-transport (H117 revenue CHF0.1m, EBITDA loss CHF0.6m)
As discussed in our initiation note on Intelligent Energy, the key driver for the adoption of electric powered vehicles is the introduction of regulations reducing carbon emissions and particulate emissions from vehicles. On-board electrical energy storage, usually a battery, is a key component in the powertrain of an electric vehicle. The battery works as an energy buffer in hybrid vehicles, and as a single energy source in full-electric vehicles. Leclanché’s battery systems may be adapted to any machine equipped with an electric powertrain. Leclanché can provide a high power option (LTO) and a high energy option (G-NMC) and a revolutionary hybrid battery that combines both technologies. Leclanché is focused on solutions for larger vehicles where weight is not an issue and where the vehicle will follow a pre-determined itinerary, returning to a depot regularly for charging under supervised conditions. Navigant Research forecasts that this market will grow from 1.7GWh in 2016 to 6.0GWh in 2020, ie a 37% CAGR. In the longer term, it has potential to be larger than stationary storage systems associated with the electricity grid. In May 2017 Lux Research predicted that electric vehicles and hybrids will push energy storage revenues in transportation to US$69bn/year by 2025, while transformations in the electricity grid bring stationary storage to US$19bn/year.
Leclanché is involved in a range of projects in this sector. Following the delivery in 2015 of the first three all-electric buses to operate in Belgium, in June 2017 Leclanché announced a Joint Development Agreement and Framework Purchase Contract with Skoda Electric. The agreement is global, with an initial term of five years and the first deliverable the release of a scalable 50-350kWh battery system by the end of FY17. This system will be certified for use in Europe, which industry analyst ZeEUS notes is the second largest market for electric buses, with 1,273 electric buses in service in 2016, more than double the 2015 level. Leclanché will provide both larger, high-energy G-NMC based systems for overnight charging and smaller, ultra-fast charge LTO systems for topping up charge at bus stations during the day. An LTO cell-based module completed its quality certification testing in Beijing in Q117, opening up the electric bus market in China. This is a key market, with around 345,000 vehicles in service during 2016. Leclanché also has a framework agreement with a leading automotive integrator in India to provide battery packs for electric taxis. Management is also in discussions to supply battery systems to power trolley buses in the Czech Republic.
Electric vehicle charging systems
Adoption of battery-powered electric vehicles is being held back by the availability of public fast-charge stations. Electric vehicles are fairly restricted regarding the distance they can travel between charges, with typical family cars such as the Mitsubishi i-MiEV or Nissan LEAF managing less than one hundred miles. Authorities keen to promote electric vehicle adoption are considering deployment of battery energy storage systems able to recharge a vehicle in around 20 minutes, which is about the time of a motorway coffee break. This type of system also provides a potential solution to the additional amount of electricity required if a significant proportion of vehicles are powered by batteries, in which case existing energy networks would not be sufficient. Instead, renewable power generation sources could be constructed to meet the additional energy requirement, with the charge stored until needed. Leclanché is working with eCAMION, a Canada-based provider of modular smart energy storage solutions, and with SGEM to develop and install a C$17.3m network of 34 fast-charging stations along the Trans-Canada Highway. These fast charge stations will use Leclanché’s LTO batteries, which charge up slowly from the grid overnight and then discharge rapidly when required. Leclanché is also working on a battery storage solution for Fastned’s fast charging electric vehicle stations, starting with a pilot at two locations. Fastned has built and is operating 63 fast charging EV stations in the Netherlands. Fastned is partnering with Transport for London on developing 300 fast charging points for deployment by 2020, and in September it was awarded a subsidy of €4.1m by the German government to build 25 fast charging stations.
During H117, reported segmental revenues were around half the prior year number (CHF0.1m vs CHF0.3m) as during H116 the company was working on a significant project to deliver a set of LTO cells for qualification in China for deployment in electric buses. These reported revenues exclude a CHF2.2m EU grant for an e-ferry project. Segmental EBITDA losses narrowed from CHF1.1m to CHF0.6m because of the cost reduction exercise referred to earlier. Our estimates model CHF2.9m revenues from this segment during FY17, to be generated from delivery of the battery system for Skoda and an LTO system for a medium-range commercial electric ferry operating between the islands of Ærø, Fynen and Als in southern Denmark (ie including the CHF2.2m grant). Our model shows revenue estimates increasing significantly during FY18 (CHF3.6m) and FY19 (CHF28.0m) as deliveries under the two framework agreements and the Trans-Canadian project begin to ramp up. Management estimates that the existing framework agreements could generate revenues of over CHF45m, representing delivery of over 150MW from FY19 onwards. We model segmental gross margin at 22% in FY17, in line with management guidance, falling slightly to 21% in FY18 and 20% in FY19 to reflect pricing pressure on hardware.
Commercial and industrial battery systems (H117 revenue CHF3.1m, EBITDA loss CHF0.6m)
This segment covers a diverse range of activities including material handling equipment, residential energy storage, telecoms, medical, defence, street lighting for smart cities and other speciality applications. Navigant Research forecasts that this market will grow from 1.8GWh in 2016 to 11.3GWh in 2020, ie a 58% CAGR.
Material handling equipment
Leclanché provides comprehensive energy storage solutions for industrial machines such as automatic guided vehicles (AGVs), forklifts and other material handling equipment. Leclanché’s lithium-ion batteries can be fitted as a plug-in, lead-acid replacement for forklifts and other lifting equipment. The LTO batteries are more efficient than lead-acid technology, resulting in a 20% reduction in electricity costs, and charge very quickly, typically in nine minutes, so the time on charge is less than one hour each day. Substitution of Leclanché lithium-ion batteries increases operating time and efficiency, reduces maintenance costs and increases the longevity of the system. Since the LTO batteries charge so quickly, discharged batteries do not need to be replaced with fresh ones while they are recharged, eliminating the need for a maintenance area where batteries are removed and recharged. In Q416 a globally renowned toy and entertainment company headquartered in Denmark replaced its fleet of 27 battery-powered warehouse AGVs with Leclanché’s LTO-based solutions. Leclanché was chosen over competitive solutions because it offered the lowest total cost of ownership since it was able to guarantee 80% residual capacity after seven years. The group has initiated discussions with several equipment manufacturers and has a distinct competitive advantage in being able to offer both LTO and G-NMC technology.
Off-grid residential storage
Leclanché offers a range of off-the-shelf energy storage systems for homes and small businesses. These are offered for use with solar panels, storing surplus energy generated during the day for use in the evening and at night. They are designed to last up to 15 years. Leclanché estimates that consumers can generate up to 80% of their own power in this way. Since this sector is highly competitive, with global majors such as Tesla offering systems, Leclanché has decided to focus on the Swiss market, where the requirement for a three phase variant gives it an advantage. Leclanché has launched a 4MWh standardised system. It has received two orders for this already. The system is based on technology developed for BESSs on the island of Graciosa and the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne.
Leclanché continues to sell customised battery packs for mission-critical applications such as powering miniature submarines or communications equipment for armed forces. For example, during FY16 and H117 it worked on two contracts totalling CHF5m to develop Ni-Mh batteries used to power radio communications equipment for the Swiss army. While the group has generally moved away from supplying systems for low-volume applications, it continues to address these niche areas because the work is high margin.
Segmental revenues doubled during H117 to CHF3.1m as Leclanché completed the development projects for the Swiss army. EBITDA losses halved from CHF1.7m to CHF0.6m as a result of the cost-reduction exercise referred to earlier combined with higher revenues. Management expects revenues from the Swiss army to continue at around FY16 levels during the forecast period. This is expected to be supplemented by revenues from the material handling segment and sales of the new energy storage system suitable for individual homes. These initiatives are expected to result in an increase in segmental revenues from CHF6.0m in FY17e to CHF17.0m in FY19e. We model segmental gross margin at 22% throughout the forecast period, with revenues to the defence vertical helping offset any potential pricing pressure.
Energy efficiency solutions (H117 revenue CHF1.2m, EBITDA loss CHF0.1m)
This segment relates to the distribution of smaller format batteries for commercial applications, which are manufactured by third parties in Asia and sold in Europe under brand names registered by Leclanché.
Segmental revenues decreased by 13% year-on-year and EBITA losses halved as the business focussed on more profitable lines. Leclanché is currently engaged in initiatives that will expand both the portfolio of third-party batteries it offers and the sales channels. Management expects that these will deliver segmental growth throughout the forecast period. We model a rise from CHF2.1m revenues in FY17e to CHF5.0m in FY19e. We model gross margin from this activity at 20%, in line with management guidance, throughout the forecast period as the Swiss consumer segment has historically shown little evidence of pricing pressure.
Shift to system integration changes the rules of engagement
Leclanché is a relatively small player with regards to megawatt hour capacity of batteries shipped annually. It has a global share of less than 3% (based on FY16 deliveries) compared with BYD’s 26%, LG Chem’s 19% and Samsung SDI’s 14% (source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance). However, management’s decision to become a vertically integrated group able to provide complete battery energy storage systems for utility-scale grid management and electric vehicles shifts Leclanché away from competing with larger battery manufactures with much better purchasing power, to competing with system integrators on providing complete turnkey solutions for customers.
Exhibit 5: Competitive matrix
|
Battery technology manufacturer |
Power conversion manufacturer |
Software and controls vendor |
Project developer |
Systems integrator and EPC |
Operator and maintenance provider |
Financier |
Installations |
Leclanché |
* |
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
30MWh+ |
ABB |
|
* |
|
|
* |
* |
|
5MW+ |
AES Energy Storage |
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
144MW+ |
Doosan Grid Technology |
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Not known |
GE Energy Storage |
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Not known |
Greensmith |
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
130MW+ |
LG CNS |
* (LG Chem) |
* (LG Electronics) |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
85MW |
NEC Energy Solutions |
* |
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
120MW+ |
RES |
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
90MWh+ |
S&C Electric |
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
76MW |
Siemens |
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Not known |
Tesla |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
380MW+ |
Younicos |
|
|
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
150MW |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Of the three largest battery manufacturers, only LG Chem can be regarded as providing an integrated offer, and that is only by counting other parts of the LG empire as working together to provide systems. For the three large industrial groups active in the sector (ABB, GE and Siemens), BESS is not a priority; for example, GE’s Energy Storage operation has been folded into its “Current” business and the group lacks the flexibility in pricing to work on smaller, rapidly evolving projects. Dedicated storage system integrators Greensmith and Younicos are not able to bring in a partner to provide project financing for larger developments.
Battery technology still an important differentiator
Neither the three dominant battery manufacturers nor any of the systems integrators listed above have the same range of battery technologies as Leclanché, which is able to deploy both LTO cells (which is a patented technology) and G-NMC cells. Having the two cell technologies is important because it enables Leclanché to optimise battery choice according to the application. LTO based systems are safer and longer-lasting than other lithium ion battery types and can charge and discharge much more rapidly, so are able to deliver a short burst of power when required. They are preferred for electric buses and ferries, where it is important to be able to accelerate quickly, and for hybrid power systems, where batteries must step in quickly to provide a back-up supply. Of the larger battery manufacturers, only Toshiba has LTO capability. Leclanché‘s other battery technology, G-NMC, charges and discharges more slowly than LTO, but can store more charge in the same space so is less expensive per watt. G-NMC is preferred for the systems that maintain grid stability by storing surplus power generated from renewable sources until it is needed. Of the larger battery manufacturers, only Samsung offers G-NMC technology. LG Chem has G-LMO technology, BYD has G-LFP, and Tesla has G-NCA technology. An analysis by VTT Technical Research Facility of Finland notes that G-LMO costs the same as G-NMC technology, stores a similar amount of energy and charges and discharges as quickly but does not last as long; G-LFP does not store as much energy or charge and discharge as quickly as G-NMC but is less expensive, and while G-NCA stores most energy of the five technologies studied, charges and discharges at a similar rate to G-NMC and costs the same as G-LFP, it scores least with regards to safety and lifetime.
Group revenues (including a CHF2.2m EU grant for a ferry project but excluding CHF2.2m insurance income) grew by 40% year-on-year during H117 to CHF8.0m. Revenues benefited from major contracts from the Swiss army received in FY16 and the e-transport related grant. However, the expected ramp-up in growth indicated by the order backlog for large BESS projects was stifled by lack of finance, as during FY16 management secured only CHF3.8m of its CHF30m target equity raise. In addition, Leclanché received CHF2.2m as final settlement of the insurance claim for the fire in the German battery manufacturing facility in FY16. Personnel costs fell by 8% (CHF0.8m) reflecting the restructuring and cost reduction measures taken in late 2016 and early 2017, though other operating expenses grew by 21% (CHF1.0m) because of fees associated with a programme to raise CHF75m corporate and project debt facility, which failed because of the lack of associated equity backing. EBITDA losses narrowed by 26% to CHF9.5m, helped by the income from the government grant and insurance claim. Net finance costs reduced substantially, from CHF1.8m to CHF0.5m, because of lower levels of convertible loans. Losses before tax narrowed by 31% to CHF12.0m.
Exhibit 6: Segmental analysis of revenues
CHFm |
FY15 |
FY16 |
FY17e |
FY18e |
FY19e |
H116 |
H117 |
Utility-scale generation and microgrids |
10.7 |
20.4 |
14.9 |
94.5 |
135.0 |
2.5 |
1.4 |
E-transport |
0.9 |
0.3 |
2.9* |
3.6 |
28.0 |
0.3 |
2.3* |
Commercial and industrial battery systems |
3.4 |
4.5 |
6.0 |
12.2 |
17.0 |
1.6 |
3.1 |
Energy efficiency solutions |
2.9 |
2.8 |
2.1 |
4.5 |
5.0 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
Group revenues |
17.9 |
28.1 |
25.9.** |
114.7 |
184.9 |
5.7 |
8.0* |
Source: Leclanché, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Including CHF2.2m grant. **Excluding CHF2.2m settlement for insurance claim.
H117 cash flow and balance sheet
Cash flow benefited from a CHF2.4m reduction in working capital requirements as work slowed on the large Canadian stationary energy storage project. Capital expenditure totalled CHF1.3m. Capitalised development expenditure was minimal, as engineers focused on revenue generating projects. CHF2.7m cash was provided as a short-term loan to the special purpose vehicles (SPVs) set up to finance the projects in Canada and Chicago. Cash flow benefited from an additional CHF2.2m (net) raised from the sale of equity to Baring Asset Management in April, CHF1.5m from the issue of mandatory convertible loan notes (see Exhibit 7) and a CHF2.7m bridge loan at 12% interest from major shareholder Golden Partner, which has an option to convert it to equity. Cash reduced by CHF3.8m during the period to CHF0.7m at end June 2017. Net debt increased from CHF19.4m at end FY16 to CHF26.3m at end H117, including CHF23.8m convertible loans with a maturity date of 30 June 2017 (see Exhibit 7 for details) and the Golden Partner bridge loan. Net liabilities totalled CHF12.7m.
Financing activity post-period end
Since the end of H117, management has been very active in reducing indebtedness and raising additional finance, giving it the capital resources to continue to convert its order book into revenues and maintain its mid-term growth plan. These financing activities are summarised in Exhibit 7. Our estimates identify a further funding gap of c CHF25m assuming that the full CHF11.0m of the convertible loan note issued in September 2017 are received and subsequently converted. In accordance with Edison policy, we model the remaining funding requirement as satisfied through long-term debt, assigned at group level rather than to individual projects, but note that management’s preference is for an equity-based arrangement.
Exhibit 7: Recent financing activity
Transaction |
Value |
Number of shares |
Baring Asset Management – Capital increase |
CHF2.2m H117 |
|
Mandatory Convertible Loan Note – Bruellan |
CHF 1.0m end H117 |
Converted to 666,668 shares @ CHF1.50/share |
Mandatory Convertible Loan Note – Trialford |
CHF0.5m end H117 |
Converted to 333,334 shares @CHF1.50/share |
Convertible Loan – ACE/JADE/LECN |
CHF23.8m end H117 |
CHF12.0m transferred to GP*, converted to 7,333,333 shares @ CHF1.50 Remaining CHF11.8m maturity date extended to 30 June 2018, commitment not to convert before 1 January 2018 |
Convertible Loan – GP/ACE/JADE |
<CHF11.0m Sept 17 |
New agreement, CHF5.0m received when interims published |
Mandatory Convertible Loan Note – GP |
CHF12.0m July 2017 |
Converted to 8,000,000 shares @ CHF1.50/share |
Mandatory Convertible Loan Note – Bruellan |
CHF3.0m July 2017 |
Converted to 2,000,00 shares @ CHF1.50/share |
Finexis – Placement |
CHF3.5m |
1,750,001 shares @CHF2.0/share |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *Golden Partner.
Management notes that the portfolio of projects that have already been awarded or are expected to be awarded for delivery during the remainder of 2017, 2018 and 2019 totals over 450MWh. Around 115MWh of this pipeline relates to firm contracts, which is more than double the deliveries achieved in FY16. Delays in completing financing activities means that a high proportion of the deliveries that management had originally expected to take place during FY17 will now be postponed to FY18.
Our estimates show FY17 revenues remaining at FY16 levels because of the financing situation. After that, as we assume that the company resolves its funding issues, the year-on-year increase in megawatt hours delivered during FY18 and FY19 converts to strong revenue growth at group level. Edison expects gross margin to improve to 30% during FY18 and remain at that level in FY19 as potential price erosion is balanced by economies of scale realised from higher volume output. We model FY17 personnel costs at a similar run-rate to H117, with low double-digit growth after that to support revenue growth.
Balance sheet and cash flow
Our model assumes that inventory levels will be kept relatively low during FY17, as most of the battery modules will be purchased from third parties, then increase in FY18 as module manufacture is brought in-house. Our model allocates CHF1.5m for maintenance capital expenditure during FY17, then CHF10.0m in FY18, CHF7m of which is to rebuild the equipment damaged in the fire, and increase battery manufacturing capacity, CHF2m for two module assembly lines and CHF1m to upgrade the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system. The CHF5.5m capex allocated for FY19 includes c CHF2m expanding battery production capacity in Germany and c CHF2m establishing a module assembly line elsewhere, to serve local projects. This model assumes that capital requirements have been reduced by manufacturing some battery cells through a strategic partner in China or India. Noting minimal levels of capitalised IP in FY16 we capitalise only CHF0.1m of IP annually going forward. Our model assumes that the debt associated with financing projects is assigned directly to Leclanché. In practice, each major project may be financed through a special purpose vehicle, in which case the debt would not appear on the group’s balance sheet.