Pluristem — Progress continues

Pluristem — Progress continues

Pluristem Therapeutics has had a productive FY18 to date. The company is advancing PLX-PAD in its Phase III study of critical limb ischemia (CLI) and Phase II study of intermittent claudication (IC), with the latter expecting results in early 2018. Additionally, the company received an orphan designation for PLX-R18 for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) currently in non-human primate studies and expanded its Phase I study for support of stem cell transplant to additional sites. We value Pluristem at $202m.

Analyst avatar placeholder

Written by

Pluristem Therapeutics

Progress continues

Clinical outlook

Pharma & biotech

5 February 2018

Price*

US$1.47/
NIS5.07

Market cap

US$159m/
NIS548m

*Priced as at 2 February 2018

NIS3.51/$

Net cash ($m) at end September 2017

21.3

Shares in issue

108.1m

Free float

84%

Code

PSTI

Primary exchange

NASDAQ

Secondary exchange

TASE

Share price performance

%

1m

3m

12m

Abs

6.5

(11.4)

31.8

Rel (local)

0.9

(19.1)

6.5

52-week high/low

US$2.1

US$1.1

Business description

Pluristem Therapeutics is a biotech company, headquartered in Israel, focused on the development of cell-based therapeutics derived from placenta. The company is advancing PLX-PAD for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in Phase III and has a Phase III study planned for hip fracture. PLX-R18 is being advanced for acute radiation syndrome and hematopoietic cell transplant.

Next events

FNF IND submission

Coming months

IC Phase II top-line results

Q2 2018

Analysts

Maxim Jacobs

+1 646 653 7027

Nathaniel Calloway

+1 646 653 7036

Pluristem Therapeutics has had a productive FY18 to date. The company is advancing PLX-PAD in its Phase III study of critical limb ischemia (CLI) and Phase II study of intermittent claudication (IC), with the latter expecting results in early 2018. Additionally, the company received an orphan designation for PLX-R18 for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) currently in non-human primate studies and expanded its Phase I study for support of stem cell transplant to additional sites. We value Pluristem at $202m.

Year end

Revenue ($m)

PBT*
($m)

EPS*
($)

DPS
($)

P/E
(x)

Yield
(%)

06/16

2.8

(23.2)

(0.29)

0.0

N/A

N/A

06/17

0.0

(27.8)

(0.32)

0.0

N/A

N/A

06/18e

0.0

(42.3)

(0.40)

0.0

N/A

N/A

06/19e

0.0

(46.6)

(0.41)

0.0

N/A

N/A

Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.

Orphan designation for ARS

Pluristem is currently planning a pivotal non-human primate study for PLX-R18 for the treatment ARS and are in discussions with the NIH to finance the study. The company recently received an orphan designation for the program, which will entitle the company to seven years of market exclusivity (although we do not believe this is necessary), FDA protocol guidance, grants, and US tax breaks.

PLX-R18 stem cell trial expanded

The company has on ongoing Phase I clinical trial of PLX-R18 for the support of patients with insufficient hematopoietic cell recovery following hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Pluristem announced in October 2017 that it had expanded this trial to Israel following approval from the Ministry of Health. The program was previously expected to provide a readout in Q417, although it is unclear at this point if this expansion signals a delay.

Successful offering, overhang reduced to $50m

In October 2017, Pluristem completed an offering of 9.0m shares at $1.67 for gross proceeds of $15.1m. This has reduced our expected financing gap from $63m to $50m before profitability in 2020 following the expected ARS acquisition contract, although this value may increase if the company is unable to secure this contract or sell a priority review voucher from the ARS program.

Valuation: $202m or $1.87 per share

We have increased our valuation of Pluristem to $202m from $189m. This increase was driven by the new estimated net cash ($35m) following the October 2017 offering, as well as rolling forward our NPVs. Due to the new shares in the offering, however, our valuation on a per basic share basis has reduced to $1.87 from $1.94. We expect to significantly update our valuation following the release of data from the ongoing IC Phase II trial, with data expected in early 2018, as this program also has read-throughs to the CLI clinical program in Phase III.

Investment summary

Company description: Cell therapy for multiple indications

Pluristem is a biotech company incorporated in 2001 developing cell-based therapies based on tissue derived from human placenta, an ample source of mesenchymal-like cells. These placental cells are not stem cells but share many of their characteristics and secrete a large number of biologic molecules. The utility of these cells is being investigated by the company for multiple indications in two different products: PLX-PAD for vascular disorders and healing, and PLX-R18 to stimulate bone marrow growth. The company has six clinical programs, the most advanced of which is PLX-PAD for the treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI), with an ongoing 250-person Phase III trial. The company is also investigating the cells for the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC), femoral neck fracture (FNF, the most common form of hip fracture), acute radiation syndrome (ARS), and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) support.

Valuation: $202m or $1.87 per basic share

We have increased our valuation of Pluristem to $202m from $189m, although it has reduced on a per share basis to $1.87 per basic share from $1.94 following the October 2017 offering. The increase in valuation was driven by an increase in net cash (to $35m pro forma) and rolling forward our NPVs. We expect to update our valuation following the release of data from the ongoing IC Phase II trial (expected early 2018) as this program has direct read-throughs into this indication as well as CLI.

Financials: Reduced cash requirement to $50m

Pluristem ended its fiscal Q118 on 30 September 2017 with an operating loss of $7.4m. R&D spending was the company’s major expense at $4.7m, which is largely in line with previous quarters ($4.6m in Q417).In October 2017 the company completed an offering of common stock: 9m shares at $1.67 for gross proceeds of $15.1m. We estimate a pro forma net cash position of $35m after the offering. This has reduced our expected financing requirement to $50m ($20m in FY18, $30m in FY19) from $63m. The company announced its participation in two additional Horizon 2020 studies during the quarter, from which it expects to receive $2.4m and $600,000, respectively.

Sensitivities: Clinical risk predominates

Pluristem is subject to the typical risks associated with a clinical-stage biotechnology company. The successful demonstration of efficacy in humans for its cell-based products remains the greatest risk. Historically, cell therapies have proven to be one of the most difficult classes of therapeutics to develop, and there have been no successful programs employing stem cells or progenitor cells like those used in Pluristem’s products. The company is in late-stage trials (Phase III for CLI and entering Phase III for FNF). However, the company has not successfully met any approvable endpoints for any indication, and did not perform confirmatory Phase II studies. Because of this, we consider the company’s programs high risk. The company also faces significant commercial risk. The ARS clinical program is being performed largely to secure government contracts, which have a high degree of commercial uncertainty. The CLI program must compete with consistently improving minimally invasive surgical treatments and the FNF program must justify its addition to the surgical standard of care, although this may be justified based on the poor prognosis of patients. Additionally, the company must raise $50m in additional capital to reach profitability in 2020, which poses a dilution risk. If the company is unable to secure an ARS contract or sell the program priority review voucher, this number could increase by at least $30m.

Benefiting from the placenta

Pluristem has been investigating the potential therapeutic benefit of cells derived from the human placenta. The placenta is one of a small number of sources where multipotent cells can be isolated, and harbors multiple cell lineages that are useful for different purposes. Cord blood has become famous as a source of hematopoietic stem cells that can be used in lieu of bone marrow in patients who need stem cell transplant. However, epithelial and mesenchymal progenitors cells can be also be isolated from tissues within the placenta.1 The placenta is not the only source of these cells, as various progenitors can be found in tissues throughout the body, but placenta offers a rich supply of cells of multiple lineages from tissue that would otherwise be medical waste. Although these cells are not stem cells and lack the immortality and pluripotency to meet that definition, they secrete a wide array of cytokines and growth factors and can exert a potent influence on the function of other cells in the body.

  Parolini O, et al. (2008) Isolation and Characterization of Cells from Human Term Placenta: Outcome of the First International Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells 26, 300-311.

Following the isolation of placental tissue, the cells are expanded using a proprietary tissue culture technology that enables the growth of adherent cells on a 3D matrix in bioreactors. This scalable technology allows for the production of up to 150,000 therapeutic doses of cells with the company’s current manufacturing facility. These cells can then be differentiated into different products by varying the culture conditions. The conditions to which the cells are exposed can determine their precise lineage as well as influence their secretion profile. However, the company has provided limited data on the precise cell population used in its preparations. Officially, it terms the cells it isolates as mesenchymal-like adherent stromal cells. The placental expanded (PLX) cells are then cryogenically preserved and can been stored for a number of years (currently validated up to three) before use.

The placenta is the only organ that is generated by the contact between two organisms with differing genetic backgrounds and immune systems. The developing fetus can be considered an allograft of foreign genetic material that must be protected from the host (the mother’s) immune system. The placenta has developed a series of defense mechanisms to ensure that the molecules necessary for fetal development can be transferred while remaining immune privileged. Mesenchymal progenitor cells in the placenta may help contribute to its low immune reactivity as they secrete large concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines. This feature is carried through to the cultured placental cells, as although they express HLA antigens, they do not typically need to be HLA matched against patients when used as a therapy. However, we expect that, as part of the quality control and safety assurances, the HLA types of donors and individual batches will have to be tracked and recorded. We also expect some manufacturing overhead dedicated to maintaining quality and consistency as multiple tissues sources will be used.

Exhibit 1: Pluristem pipeline

Indication

Stage

Product

Critical limb ischemia (CLI)

Phase III

PLX-PAD

Intermittent claudication (IC)

Phase II

PLX-PAD

Femoral neck fracture (FNF)

Phase III ready

PLX-PAD

Acute radiation syndrome (ARS)

NHP study

PLX-R18

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)

Phase I

PLX-R18

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics. Note: NHP=non-human primate.

Pluristem’s lead product is PLX-PAD, developed for the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The cells are a placental cell fraction similar to mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) derived from bone marrow, but lack the differentiation potential of bone marrow derived cells. The cytokines and growth factors secreted by these cells encourage angiogenesis and control inflammation, similar to what is seen in the developing placenta. The product is currently being investigated for critical limb ischemia (CLI), intermittent claudication (IC) and femoral neck fracture (FNF). The company previously investigated PLX-PAD for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in a collaboration with United Therapeutics. The collaboration was terminated in December 2015. Data were only released on the first dosing cohort of the trial (0.5m cells/kg), which stated that the three patients improved by 21 meters on a six-minute walk test, although the baseline for this group was not reported, and there was no control, making the results difficult to interpret.

The company’s other product in development is PLX-R18 as a treatment for hematologic disorders, specifically radiation exposure and hematopoietic stem cell engraftment. PLX-R18 is derived from a fraction of cells existing at the interface between the maternal and fetal tissue in the placenta and contains cells from both mother and child. This cell fraction secretes growth factors encouraging hematopoiesis, and the company hopes to use these properties of the treatment to encourage the recovery of bone marrow cells and the immune system after they are killed with radiation. The same process could potentially increase the chances of a successful bone marrow transplant and encourage the graft to proliferate before graft failure.

In addition to these products there is the potential to develop other classes of therapeutic using these cells. For instance, in January 2018 preclinical data were published that showed that cells conditioned with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) inhibited tumor growth in 26 of 59 cancer cell lines, and in a triple negative breast cancer cell line tested via mouse xenograft.2

  Allen H, et al. (2017) Human Placental-Derived Adherent Stromal Cells Co-Induced with TNF-α and IFN-γ Inhibit Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Nude Mouse Xenograft Models. Sci. Rep. 8, 670.

The company has 18 US patents covering the manufacturing, composition, and therapeutic use of PLX cells with expiration dates between 2020 and 2033. The composition of matter patent (USPA 13/642,725) expires in 2031, before patent term extensions.

Critical limb ischemia

Pluristem is investigating PLX-PAD for the treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI). CLI is the most severe form of PAD and is characterized by the blockage of major arteries in the lower extremities. The key diagnostic indicator for CLI is pain in the legs that occurs when at rest, due to lack of oxygen. CLI is a high-risk disease: in the US Medicare population, the rate of amputation in one year or less following diagnosis was 33.5% and the one-year mortality rate was 30.3%.3 The disease is caused by the build-up of atherosclerotic plaques in the vessels of the legs, typically secondary to poor peripheral circulation due to diabetes, obesity, or other vascular disorders. Additional risk factors for CLI are similar to other vascular disorders and include smoking, being of male sex, high cholesterol and high blood pressure. The working group for the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) on the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease estimates the incidence of CLI in the US and Europe at between 500 and 1,000 new cases per year per one million in population.4

  Baser O, et al. (2013) Prevalence, Incidence, and Outcomes of Critical Limb Ischemia in the US Medicare Population. Vas. Dis. Management 10(2).

  Norgren L, et al (2007) Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) J. Vasc. Surg. 45(1), S5-S67.

The most common treatments for CLI are revascularization via a bypass or endovascular intervention (angioplasty, atherectomy, or stents). However, only half of all CLI patients are fit for these procedures.3 We expect the medical device technology to continue to advance and provide new options in the form of drug-coated balloons and other technology, especially in difficult-to-treat, below the knee occlusions. However, there will be a persistent need for non-invasive solutions for patients in poor health and with occlusion in smaller vessels. Cell-based therapies have emerged as potential treatments because the growth factors secreted by multipotent cells can encourage the formation of new blood vessels. There have been a large number of clinical studies of multipotent cells for the treatment of CLI going back to at least 2002.5 However, these studies have generally been small, and there has been little progress in the private sector (Exhibit 2), and no approvals. The most advanced trial was for Ixmyelocel-T from Vericel, which terminated early in 2013 following enrolment difficulties stemming from the trial design. The trial was terminated after a year when only 40 of the planned 594 patients had enrolled. Vericel terminated the trial after attempts to increase enrolment by increasing the number of trial sites (from 70 to over 100) and loosening the enrolment criteria (by removing the “no option” criterion) failed to accelerate the rate of new patients. The difficulties observed in this trial should serve as a precaution for the future clinical efforts to develop PLX-PAD. However, it is important to note that while the Vericel product required harvesting and then a return trip by the patient for infusion, PLX-PAD can be administered via a standard syringe in one visit. To our knowledge, currently the only other company technically with a Phase III development plan is Cesca Therapeutics. It initiated a Phase III for its SurgWerks-CLI platform in 2016, although it has not enrolled any patients, and this device appears to be deprioritized in favor of the company’s MXP system, which has not entered the clinic.

  Tateishi-Yuyama E, et al. (2002) Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-marrow cells: a pilot study and a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360(9331), 427-435.

Exhibit 2: Cell-based therapies for PAD

Product

Company

Stage

Auto/Allo

Lineage

Notes

Ixmyelocel-T

Vericel

Phase III

Autologous

Mesenchymal stem cells

Phase III terminated in 2013 due to poor enrolment

SurgWerks-CLI and MXP

Cesca

Phase III

Autologous

Bone marrow derived mononuclear cells

Stem cell isolation devices. Development stalled

ERC-124

Intrexon

Phase II

Allogenic

Endometrial regenerative cells

Last public clinical development in 2013

ACP-01

Hemostemix

Phase II

Autologous

Blood derived progenitor cells

CLBS12

Caladrius Biosciences

Phase II

Autologous

CD34+ cells

Alecmestencel-T

apceth

Phase I/II

Autologous

Mesenchymal stem cells

No progress since 2014

Biochymal

Taiwan Bio

Phase I/II

Allogenic

Mesenchymal stem cells

Source: Evaluate Pharma, Pluristem Therapeutics documents

Pluristem reported results from two open-label Phase I studies (one in the US, n=12, one in Germany, n=15) of PLX-PAD in patients with CLI who lacked surgical options in 2011. The US study investigated the difference in safety and efficacy of a single administration of 280m cells, or the same injection given two weeks apart. The German trial investigated three different doses of cells: 200m, 300m and 600m. The primary efficacy endpoints of the trials were the fraction of patients with amputation-free survival (AFS, no amputations or death) at six months and one year.

Combined, the two studies showed 85% AFS, 100% for the US study and 73% for the German study (Exhibit 3). There is a high degree of variability for AFS reported in the literature, and the rate appears to have been increasing since the mid-1990s due to higher rates of revascularization procedures as well as better diabetes control, antiplatelet therapy, infection control and smoking cessation.6 The largest trial to date examining AFS in CLI patients (the TAMARIS gene therapy trial) showed an AFS of 67% in the control arm.

  Benoit E, et al. (2012) Improved amputation-free survival in unreconstructable critical limb ischemia and its implications for clinical trial design and quality measurement. J. Vasc. Surg. 55, 781-789.

Exhibit 3: CLI amputation and survival studies

Author

Trial

Year

No.

Amp

Death

AFS

Jivegård

Spinal cord stimulation

1995

26

50%

31%

N/A

Lepäntalo

Retrospective clinical review

1996

105

46%

54%

28%

Claeys

Spinal cord stimulation

1996

41

20%

29%

N/A

Klomp

Spinal cord stimulation

1999

60

48%

23%

40%

Spincemaille

Spinal cord stimulation

2000

18

50%

28%

N/A

Amann

Spinal cord stimulation

2003

39

46%

0%

54%

Marston

Wound care only

2006

86

38%

0%

62%

Brass

CIRCULASE (PGE1 analog)

2006

190

11%

10%

81%

Nikol

TALISMAN (NV1FGF gene therapy)

2008

56

34%

23%

48%

Hiatt

TAMARIS (NV1FGF gene therapy)

2010

259

21%

15%

67%

Powell

Intramuscular hepatocyte GF

2010

6

33%

17%

N/A

Pluristem

PLX-PAD US Study

2010

12

N/A

N/A

100%

Pluristem

PLX-PAD German Study

2011

15

N/A

N/A

73%

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics, Benoit et al5

It should be noted, however, that Pluristem studies were not powered for statistical significance and carry the inherent biases associated with open-label studies. Additionally, patients in the US study were relatively mild in terms of CLI: before the start of the trial, patients had transcutaneous partial oxygen (TcPO2) concentrations of 45.5mmHg, with is at the low end of the normal range (depending on location of measurement, the low end is 45-55 mmHg).7 Patients in the German study had TcPO2 concentrations of 12.6 at induction, by comparison. The company did not report any safety issues from the studies, and noted that there were no immune reactions or neoplasms as a result of the treatment.

  Dowd GSE, et al. (1984) Measurement of transcutaneous oxygen pressure in normal and ischaemic skin. J. Bone Joint Surg. 65-B(1) 79-83.

Pluristem currently has an ongoing pivotal Phase III CLI trial in the US and EU. The trial is currently enrolling up to 246 patients who are otherwise unsuitable for revascularization, and will measure the time to amputation or death as the primary endpoint. The company has stated that it expects a single trial to be sufficient to support approval, and it has consulted with both the FDA and EMA regarding the pathway. In part, this is enabled by the large safety database that will be provided by the ongoing intermittent claudication clinical trial. The program has fast-track in the US and has an adaptive pathway designation in the EU, which may entitle it to early provisional approval (after 123 events). Additionally the program received fast-track status from the FDA in September 2017. All of these special programs ensure an increased level of interaction with the regulatory agencies and guidance. The company also has plans to initiate a 75-person study in Japan, through a subsidiary co-owned by Sosei. This is also expected to be the only trial needed for approval, as in Japan, regenerative products face a lower bar of statistical evidence for approval (statistical safety and a signal of efficacy). We should note that the decision to progress to a Phase III trial without a confirmatory Phase II study and without statistically demonstrating a treatment effect is exceptionally aggressive and the program is high risk.

The drug is also available in the US through the FDA’s Expanded Access (approved January 2018) program for CLI patients with severe disease that cannot participate in the Phase III. This program allows access to the treatment for patients outside of the clinical trials, and the potential for reimbursement to the company at cost. The FDA makes this determination on the basis that there is evidence of safety and effectiveness and a lack of other treatments. We believe that this designation is indicative of the innocuous safety profile of the treatment and the program may provide further support for the safety database.

Intermittent claudication

Pluristem is also developing PLX-PAD for the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC), a milder form of PAD than CLI. IC is characterized by pain in the legs that occurs with exertion, but goes away with rest, as opposed to CLI. IC can progress to CLI without treatment (although CLI can also occur de novo, without any prior history of claudication). The incidence of IC is substantially higher than CLI, with a prevalence of 1% to 5% of the US general population.8 Also, unlike CLI, the prognosis for patients with IC is generally positive, as the disease can resolve itself spontaneously, without the need for intervention. The first line of treatment recommended by TASC is encouraging increased activity, which can improve pain, and this is followed by medical treatment if the issue does not resolve itself. There are currently several approved medications for PAD that are used to treat IC: Pletal (cilostazol, Otsuka), Praxilene (naftidrofuryl, Merck Serono) and pentoxifylline. In addition, painkillers or drugs to treat the underlying atherosclerotic risk factors can be prescribed. All of these drugs are genericized and typically retail for less than $2 per day. Revascularization is rare for these patients, but is increasing in frequency.3

  McDermott MM (2006) The magnitude of the problem of peripheral arterial disease: Epidemiology and clinical significance. Clevland Clin. J. Med. 73(s4), s2-s7.

The company is currently engaged in a 170-person, Phase II study of PLX-PAD for intermittent claudication (IC). The trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study measuring the maximum walking distance of IC sufferers on a treadmill a year after two injections of PLX-PAD. The trial was initiated in 2012 and had initial enrolment difficulties, although the company announced enrolment was complete in early 2017. We expect the trial to be complete and to provide top-line results in H118.

Hip injury

Pluristem has investigated the use of PLX-PAD as an agent to aid in the regrowth of muscle following surgery on the hip. The goal of this treatment is to improve muscle healing following surgery. Initial studies focused on treatment following total hip replacement (THR) surgeries for osteoarthritis, but the current clinical pathway is focused on aiding recovery following THR for femoral neck fracture (FNF). The femoral neck is the region of the femur immediately before the ball-and-socket joint into the hip. Fractures of this type are common in the elderly, especially osteoporotic women. Each year, 63.3 women and 27.7 men per 100,000 have FNF.9

  Koval KJ and Zuckerman JD (1994) Overview and evaluation and treatment of femoral-neck fractures. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2(3), 141-149.

FNF is most commonly treated surgically, with either fixation and repair of the fracture with implants, or with hip replacement. Pharmacologic treatments associated with FNF surgery are limited to prophylactic antibiotics and postoperative analgesics. Forteo (teriparatide, Lilly) can be given following surgery to improve bone density. There currently are no treatments in the same niche as PLX-PAD designed to improve muscle healing and the degree of medical need for such a therapy is unclear at this time. However, the addition of this procedure to surgery may be justified on the basis of the poor prognosis of these patients. FNF is associated with a mortality risk, although the effect is highly variable based on the study and corrective procedure (4.2-20%).10 The exact extent that PLX-PAD can improve on outcomes remains to be elucidated.

  Bhandari M, et al (2003) Internal Fixation Compared with Arthroplasty for Displaced Fractures of the Femoral Neck. J. Bone Joint Surg. 85(9) 1673-1681.

PLX-PAD has been studied in a single Phase I/II study in patients following elective THR, which reported results in January 2014. It should be noted that this indication is different to current hip injury indication and included patients that opted for THR as a treatment for osteoarthritis. These patients have a significantly higher quality of life and lower morbidity than patients following hip fracture. The randomized, double-blind study measured the contractile force of patients’ gluteal muscle (the muscle damaged during surgery) six months following a single dose of PLX-PAD. The increase in muscle volume was measured via MRI as a secondary endpoint. The 20 patients in the trial were split between a 150m cell dose (n=7), a 300m cell dose (n=6), and placebo (n=7). The trial demonstrated a significant increase in both the contractile force of approximately five times that of placebo for the 150m cell dose (p=0.0067), and increase in muscle volume for this dose of approximately 300% (p=0.004). There is some difficulty in interpreting how these results will translate into functional improvement because the baseline was not reported for either of these metrics. Although there was a trend towards improvement in both metrics for the higher 300m dose, the results were lower than seen for the 150m cell dose and not significant. The reason for this discrepancy is probably that the 300m cell dose was administered in the same volume as the 150m cell dose (ie double the concentration), possibly negatively affecting the survivability of the cells. The company did not report any adverse reactions in the trial, including immune responses, but subclinical immune reactions are common with biologics, and contribute to the “bell shaped” activity curves that are often seen, and provide an upper limit of the effective dose.

Exhibit 4: Muscle contractile force following THR

Exhibit 5: Muscle volume following THR

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics. Note: Dotted lines show treatment with different cell concentrations of PLX-PAD.

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics. Note: Dotted lines show treatment with different cell concentrations of PLX-PAD.

Exhibit 4: Muscle contractile force following THR

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics. Note: Dotted lines show treatment with different cell concentrations of PLX-PAD.

Exhibit 5: Muscle volume following THR

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics. Note: Dotted lines show treatment with different cell concentrations of PLX-PAD.

The company announced on 26 September 2017 that it had received “positive feedback” from the FDA and EMA regarding a proposed Phase III clinical trial for FNF. The trial will enrol 180 patients across the US and Europe who will receive an injection of 150m PLX-PAD cells during an arthroplasty procedure. The study will be randomized, double blind and placebo controlled. The primary endpoint will be change in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at six months following injury. The SPPB is a series of simple physical tests of the lower extremities that mimic the physical requirements of daily activity and it is typically used to assess geriatric patients. The battery is semi-quantitative and composed of three sections measuring different aspects of function: balance, gait speed, and getting into and out of a chair. The company announced that it will be submitting an IND for the FNF clinical program in the coming months following the announcement, shortly after which we expect the Phase III trial to be initiated.

Radiation exposure

The company is investigating using PLX-R18 cells for the treatment of individuals following severe radiation exposure. Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) is a cluster of health effects following exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation. This radiation can cause damage to DNA, which can have devastating effects on rapidly dividing cells, such as those in the gastrointestinal tract and bone marrow. The effects on the hematopoietic cells of the bone marrow typically result in a decrease in red blood cells, platelets and immune cells, leading to difficulty in healing, which can further complicate any other injuries sustained during a traumatic exposure event, as well as hemorrhage and severe anemia. PLX-R18 is being tested for radiation exposure because the combination of growth factors secreted by these cells encourages the proliferation of hematopoietic cells and can potentially aid in maintaining immune cell populations.

Potential exposures include industrial accidents as well as nuclear weapons devices. The US federal government therefore has a vested interest in maintaining stockpiles of agents that can be deployed quickly following such an event, and stockpiles of radiation treatments are maintained by the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS), managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The SNS currently stockpiles Neupogen (filgrastim, Amgen) for the treatment of ARS, among other more basic medications such as chelators and potassium iodide. Neupogen is stockpiled for similar applications to PLX-R18 to aid in restoring the immune system following radiation exposure, although this is not an approved indication and Neupogen only affects white blood cells (PLX-R18 helps to regenerate white cells, red cells and platelets). Also, platelet infusion is required on top of Neupogen treatment, which may be difficult in the case of a nuclear event. SNS acquired a quantity of Neupogen for $155m in an initial contract in 2013. Subsequently, the SNS has acquired a smaller amount of the similar but longer-lasting Neulasta (pegfilgrastim, Amgen) for $37.7m in 2016. PLX-R18 has the potential advantage of encouraging the growth of a broader array of hematopoietic cells, besides just neutrophils, as is the case with Neupogen and Neulasta. However, we lack significant insight into the government contracting and procurement process outside its prior history. If the company is able to secure a contract, we would expect potential future procurements to replace expired product.

Exhibit 6: Development stage ARS treatments

Product

Target

Company

Latest developments

Entolimod

TLR5 agonist

Cleveland BioLabs

Pre-EUA dossier filed

HemaMax

Interleukin-12

Neumedicines

Large animal

Recilisib

DNA repair modulator

Onconova

NHPs

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics reports, Evaluate Pharma

Previous research

Pluristem reported the results from its non-human primate (NHP) study of PLX-R18 for the treatment of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) in early May 2017. The product is being developed for ARS via the FDA animal rule, which allows for approval based on animal studies for conditions such as ARS that cannot be feasibly studied in human clinical trials, so this NHP study is an important component of the approval package. Studies in NHPs are important to establish safety and as the basis for the human dose equivalent, as these animals provide the closest approximation to human subjects, and the purpose of this study was to determine the optimal dose.

The 48 animals were separated into four dosing arms (4, 10, 20 million cells per kilogram, and control) and were either irradiated or left intact. The study saw a trend towards increasing survival in the active arms of the trial: 83%, 86% and 67%, respectively, compared to 50% for the control (Exhibit 7). This “bell shaped” response, in which higher doses can have lower efficacy, is not uncommon with biologics, and these data provide an important insight into the correct dose with which to proceed in future studies. Unfortunately, these data were not powered for statistical significance.

Exhibit 7: Survival of non-human primates with ARS following PLX-R18 dosing

Source: Pluristem Therapeutics

Importantly, the company also reported that there were no safety issues seen in the non-irradiated group (although detailed safety information was not released), and that leukocyte counts were not increased in these animals. This means that the treatment can potentially be administered before determining the degree of radiation exposure without concern for adverse reactions. The company also stated that PLX-R18 led to improvement in an array of hematopoietic cells, although further details were not provided.

These results compare favorably to Neupogen (albeit in NHP instead of humans), which is the currently stockpiled treatment for hematopoietic recovery from ARS. Neupogen showed an improvement in survival to 79% from 59% in the control arm from a study of 46 NHPs (p=0.023).11 On a placebo adjusted basis, Neupogen provided only a 20% improvement in survival compared to 36% for the optimal dose of PLX-R18. Moreover, PLX-R18 could provide a safer and more convenient dosing strategy than Neupogen, if PLX-R18 continues to show a benign safety profile. Neupogen has the potential to induce leukocytosis if overdosed, and requires blood tests every three days to ensure normal white blood cell counts. A drug that can be dosed without risk like PLX-R18 may be beneficial, especially in emergency radiation exposure situations. Finally, Neupogen only improves neutrophil cell counts, whereas the company stated that PLX-R18 improved multiple lineages, which would be a significant improvement over the former, although we would like to see data from NHP to back up these claims.

  Neupogen label.

The company will need to perform an additional NHP study that is adequately powered for statistical significance to receive approval for ARS treatment. Additionally, a human safety database must be established, although data from other trials using PLX-R18 (such as the Phase I trial in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients) can be used. Finally, a human/animal dose conversion study must be performed, which simply requires pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons between humans and animals. The development program to this point has been conducted by the NIH and, as such, there has no cost to the company at this stage. The company is in ongoing discussions with the NIH to finance the pivotal animal study (which has not started yet).

In August 2017, the company announced that the US Department of Defense (DOD) also has an interest in studying the therapy. The proposed DOD pilot study would test PLX-R18 after radiation exposure as in previous studies, but will also test whether the product can encourage hematopoietic recovery when administered before radiation exposure. This will support the potential use of the product for the US military’s unique needs to protect personnel from potential or imminent radiation exposure. This program, if successful, could provide additional revenue streams to the company in the form of DOD acquisition contracts.

An additional upside to the program is that it would qualify Pluristem to receive a priority review voucher (PRV) from the FDA. These vouchers are issued by the FDA to encourage certain development programs such as underserved indications and they allow the voucher holder to shorten the FDA period of review from 10 to six months. PRVs are not attached to a particular company and can be freely traded, and we fully expect Pluristem to sell any vouchers it acquires. In the recent 21st Century Cures Act, the agency expanded the PRV program to include products that are potentially important to national security, and agents used in the event of radiological threats expressly fall under this definition. Therefore, the company should be able to apply for such a voucher in the event that the product gains approval. The most recent voucher sale was for $125m from Sarepta Therapeutics to Gilead in February 2017. These vouchers have been less expensive lately (from a peak of $350m) and we expect prices to continue to trend lower with the recent expansion.

In other regulatory news, in October 2017 the company announced that PLX-R18 had received orphan drug designation from the FDA. This would entitle the company to seven years of market exclusivity if it is approved, as well as FDA protocol guidance, grants, and US tax breaks. The main benefit we see to Pluristem is in increased agency interaction, which has few downsides, but the other factors are less impactful as we model the current IP as sufficient, the program is currently funded by the NIH, and the company already receives significant incentives based on its Israeli domicile.

Stem cell transplant programs

Pluristem is also investigating PLX-R18 for a series of indications associated with stem cell transplant. The most advanced program from these studies is an ongoing Phase I clinical investigation of PLX-R18 to support the engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells following transplant. The same factors secreted by PLX-R18 cells that encourage the proliferation of hematopoietic cells following radiation also encourage the growth and differentiation of transplanted cells. There were approximately 22k hematopoietic cell transplants (HCTs) reported in the US in 2015.12 A majority of these (~60%) were autologous transplants of the patient’s own cells. Cord blood transplants make up the minority with less than 1,000 procedures per year. The company previously stated that interim results from the clinical trial would be available in H217, although it recently expanded the trial sites in the study, which may result in a delay. There is also an ongoing preclinical study sponsored by the New York Blood Center to investigate the efficacy of PLX-R18 as an adjuvant for cord blood transplantation.

  Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research.

The company tested the capacity of the therapy to improve the transplant of human cord blood into mice.13 Human CD45 was tracked in the mice as a marker for mature lymphocytes, indicating the quality of graft. The concentration of CD45 positive cells in the blood arm rose significantly faster in the PLX-R18 treated arm to approximately 3-4 times the concentration in the control arm (p<0.001), but normalized significantly (to <2 times control) by week 8. An earlier study in 2007 examined a different PLX cell fraction (PLX-I) in a similar system examining the number of human CD45 cells in mice following a cord blood transplant that were preconditioned with either radiation or chemotherapy.14 The number of CD45 cells in the radiation preconditioned arm was 133% higher compared to control (p=0.01) and 357% higher in the chemotherapy preconditioned arm (p<0.05). The company initiated a 30-person Phase I clinical study of PLX-R18 to treat incomplete recovery following HCT in the US.

  Metheny L, et al. (2016) Intramuscular Injection of PLX-R18 Improves Human Engraftment in NSG Mice Following Transplantation with CD34+ Umbilical Cord Blood. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 22(3), S148

  Burger O, et al. (2007) Human Placental Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSC) Grown in 3D-Culture (PLX-I), Promotes Engraftment of Human Umbilical Cord Blood (hUCB) Derived CD34+ Cells in NOD/SCID Mice. Blood 10(11) abstract #1416.

The company also recently announced in November 2017 that it would be collaborating with Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center to investigate PLX-PAD for the treatment of steroid refractory chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). GvHD is a complication associated with allogeneic HCT, in which the transplanted white blood cells have an immune response against the host. Incidence estimates for the chronic form of the disease vary significantly from study to study from 6% to 80% of allogeneic transplants.15 Of these patients, 30-50% are well controlled with steroids.16 This corresponds to approximately 3,500 patients in the US at the high end of estimates. The rationale behind using PLX-R18 is that the anti-inflammatory properties of these cells could potentially mitigate some of the immune response and protect patients. However, the therapy would have to compete with a range of other immunosuppressive therapies that are used in the second line. The company currently has a planned Phase I/II study, which we consider largely exploratory at this stage.

  Filipovich AH, et al. (2005) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. Diagnosis and Staging Working Group Report. Biol. Blood Marrow Transpl. 11, 945-956.

  Le Blanc K, et al. (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study. Lancet 371, 10-16.

Sensitivities

The largest risks to Pluristem are clinical in nature. Historically, cell therapies have had one of the lowest success ratios of any class of therapeutic, and progenitor or stem cells have never been approved. The PLX system may have some advantages over other cell-based systems because of the readily available source of cells and what appears to be a compatible immunogenicity profile, but the clinical data supporting the safety and efficacy of the therapy are very limited for all of the indications being examined. The company has completed only a handful of small clinical trials, and the total number of patients who have received the therapy is very small. In addition, the clinical development plan for the company has few risk hedges and involves moving directly into Phase III for the CLI and FNF development programs, without supporting Phase II trials for these indications. The company did perform a Phase I/II trial in THR, however, which is a different but related indication to FNF. To date, the company has not achieved any statistically significant results for an approvable endpoint in any of its programs.

The most commercially uncertain program is the PLX-R18 for ARS, which depends on obtaining government contracts. This commercial risk is offset by the lack of development costs for the program. We expect increasing competition in the CLI market as medical devices advance their ability to perform revascularizations below the knee. There is potential for commercial resistance to PLX-PAD for FNF because the additional expense on top of hip replacement must be justified. This effect may be offset if the treatment improves long-term outcomes (and thus total payer spending) in this vulnerable population. There may also be adoption issues of PLX-PAD for IC, which does not present the same immediate threat to health that CLI does and can generally be managed with exercise. We expect that the company will require $50m in additional capital, in addition to any development grants, to reach profitability in 2020. This value may increase dramatically if the company is unable to secure a procurement contract for PLX-R18 at that time.

Valuation

We have increased our valuation of Pluristem to $202m from $189m. This increase was driven by the new estimated net cash ($35m) following the October 2017 offering, as well as rolling forward our NPVs. Due to the new shares in the offering, however, our valuation on a per basic share basis has reduced to $1.87 from $1.94. Otherwise, our assumptions remain unchanged. We do not include the recently initiated GvHD program in our valuation as we see it as exploratory at this point, but we may add it if the company presents promising results. Additionally, we have not included the DOD ARS program in our valuation, but may add this in the future as well. The largest near-term inflection point will be the results from the Phase II IC clinical trial in early 2018, which will have implications for this program as well as CLI.

Exhibit 8: Valuation of Pluristem

Development Program

Prior data

Clinical stage

Prob. of success

Launch year

Launch pricing ($)

Peak sales ($m)

Patent/exclusivity protection

Royalty/ margin

rNPV ($m)

CLI, US

2x Phase I

Phase III

10%

2021

22,500

235

2036

63%

43.28

CLI, Europe

2x Phase I

Phase III

10%

2021

13,500

247

2036

59%

41.07

CLI, Japan

2x Phase I

Phase I/II

20%

2021

22,500

76

2036

27%

9.55

CLI, development costs

-18.39

FNF (US and Europe)

Phase I for THR

Phase III ready

15%

2021

22,100

171

2036

55%

17.25

ARS

Primate Studies

Pivotal primate study

10%-20%

2020

N/A

155/
contract

2036

77%

35.79

IC, US

N/A

Phase II

7.5%

2022

11,500

443

2036

57%

37.16

IC, Europe

N/A

Phase II

7.5%

2022

6,900

466

2036

50%

32.96

IC, Japan

N/A

Phase II

15%

2022

11,500

144

2036

20%

7.01

IC, development costs

-35.93

HCT (US and Europe)

Mouse Studies

Phase I

5%

2023

29,300

239

2036

61%

8.13

Unallocated costs

-11.03

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

166.83

Net cash and equivalents (FQ118 + offering) ($m)

35.02

Total firm value ($m)

201.85

Total basic shares (m, after offering)

108.1

Value per basic share ($)

1.87

Dilutive warrants (m)

8.45

Diluted firm value ($m)

213.68

Value per diluted share ($)

1.83

Source: Edison Investment Research, Pluristem company reports

Financials

Pluristem ended its fiscal Q118 on 30 September 2017 with an operating loss of $7.4m. R&D spending was the company’s major expense at $4.7m, which is largely in line with previous quarters ($4.6m in Q417). In October 2017 the company completed an offering of common stock: 9m shares at $1.67 for gross proceeds of $15.1m. We estimate pro forma net cash of $35m after the offering. This has reduced our expected financing requirement to $50m ($20m in FY18, $30m in FY19) from $63m. This financing requirement is contingent on the company either receiving an ARS government contract or selling the program’s priority review voucher in 2020. If neither of these occurs, we expect the company to require at least $30m in additional cash. The company’s cash needs are partially offset by grants it has received. The company quotes that it is participating in grants totalling $27m. However, it is only entitled to a fraction of this cash. For instance, the company is part of consortiums that are provisionally entitled to three different Horizon 2020 grants totalling $24.6m: $8m, $8.7m, and $7.9m individually. However, the company is only entitled to a fraction of these amounts: approximately $2.2m, $2.4m and $600,000 respectively, and a large portion will go directly to manufacturing costs associated with the studies, although there may be other cost savings.

Exhibit 9: Financial summary

$'000s

2015

2016

2017

2018e

2019e

Year end 30 June

US GAAP

US GAAP

US GAAP

US GAAP

US GAAP

PROFIT & LOSS

Revenue

 

 

379

2,847

0

0

0

Cost of Sales

(13)

(100)

0

0

0

Gross Profit

366

2,747

0

0

0

Research and development

(19,173)

(19,580)

(21,092)

(33,754)

(35,267)

Selling, general & administrative

(6,460)

(6,486)

(6,927)

(7,151)

(7,508)

EBITDA

 

 

(27,341)

(25,469)

(30,196)

(42,443)

(44,032)

Operating Profit (before amort. and except.)

(25,267)

(23,319)

(28,019)

(40,905)

(42,775)

Intangible Amortisation

0

0

0

0

0

Exceptionals/Other

0

0

0

0

0

Operating Profit

(25,267)

(23,319)

(28,019)

(40,905)

(42,775)

Net Interest

590

73

205

(1,395)

(3,795)

Other (change in fair value of warrants)

0

0

0

0

0

Profit Before Tax (norm)

 

 

(24,677)

(23,246)

(27,814)

(42,300)

(46,570)

Profit Before Tax (IFRS)

 

 

(24,677)

(23,246)

(27,814)

(42,300)

(46,570)

Tax

0

0

0

0

0

Deferred tax

0

0

0

0

0

Profit After Tax (norm)

(24,677)

(23,246)

(27,814)

(42,300)

(46,570)

Profit After Tax (IFRS)

(24,677)

(23,246)

(27,814)

(42,300)

(46,570)

Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m)

70.3

79.5

87.4

106.2

113.6

EPS - normalised (c)

 

 

(35.11)

(29.22)

(31.81)

(39.82)

(40.99)

EPS - IFRS ($)

 

 

(0.35)

(0.29)

(0.32)

(0.40)

(0.41)

Dividend per share (c)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

BALANCE SHEET

Fixed Assets

 

 

11,287

10,345

8,518

7,209

11,170

Intangible Assets

0

0

0

0

0

Tangible Assets

10,173

9,216

7,277

5,947

9,908

Other

1,114

1,129

1,241

1,262

1,262

Current Assets

 

 

56,868

35,596

29,016

30,550

11,452

Stocks

0

0

0

0

0

Debtors

1,691

2,228

1,036

25

25

Cash

53,119

32,750

26,665

29,054

9,956

Other

2,058

618

1,315

1,471

1,471

Current Liabilities

 

 

(6,183)

(5,775)

(5,414)

(10,658)

(8,429)

Creditors

(6,183)

(5,775)

(5,414)

(10,658)

(8,429)

Short term borrowings

0

0

0

0

0

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

(3,829)

(2,010)

(1,869)

(21,819)

(51,819)

Long term borrowings

0

0

0

(20,000)

(50,000)

Other long term liabilities

(3,829)

(2,010)

(1,869)

(1,819)

(1,819)

Net Assets

 

 

58,143

38,156

30,251

5,282

(37,626)

CASH FLOW

Operating Cash Flow

 

 

(20,605)

(18,522)

(21,611)

(31,036)

(43,880)

Net Interest

0

0

0

0

0

Tax

0

0

0

0

0

Capex

(831)

(1,750)

(378)

(267)

(5,218)

Acquisitions/disposals

0

0

0

0

0

Financing

17,201

807

15,728

14,724

0

Dividends

0

0

0

0

0

Other

0

0

0

0

0

Net Cash Flow

(4,235)

(19,465)

(6,261)

(16,579)

(49,098)

Opening net debt/(cash)

 

 

(58,819)

(53,119)

(32,750)

(26,665)

(9,054)

HP finance leases initiated

5

0

0

0

0

Exchange rate movements

0

0

0

0

0

Other

(1,470)

(904)

176

(1,032)

0

Closing net debt/(cash)

 

 

(53,119)

(32,750)

(26,665)

(9,054)

40,044

Source: Edison Investment Research, Pluristem company reports

Contact details

Revenue by geography

MATAM Advanced Technology Park
Building #5
Haifa 31905
Israel
+972-74-710-8600
www.pluristem.com

N/A

Contact details

MATAM Advanced Technology Park
Building #5
Haifa 31905
Israel
+972-74-710-8600
www.pluristem.com

Revenue by geography

N/A

Management team

Chairman and co-CEO: Zami Aberman

President and co-CEO: Yaky Yanay

Mr Zami Aberman joined Pluristem in September 2005, and redirected the company’s strategy towards cellular therapeutics. Prior to Pluristem, Mr Aberman had a 30-year career as a senior executive in the high-tech industry with multiple companies in Israel, the US, Europe, Japan and Korea. Previous roles include chairman of VLScom, a private company specializing in video compression for HDTV and video over IP.

Yaky Yanay was appointed as Pluristem’s president and chief operating officer in February 2014 and prior to that served as Pluristem’s chief financial officer and secretary since November 2006, and executive vice president since March 2013. Before joining Pluristem, Mr Yanay was the chief financial officer of Elbit Vision Systems, a public company. Prior to that Mr Yanay served as manager of audit groups of the technology sector at Ernst & Young Israel.

CFO: Erez Egozi

VP of Clinical and Medical Affairs: Esther Lukasiewicz Hagai, MD, PhD

Erez Egozi joined Pluristem in March 2015 as vice president of finance and became CFO in March 2017. Prior to joining Pluristem, Mr Egozi spent eight years with Verint Systems Inc (Nasdaq: VRNT), serving as senior director of finance – worldwide finance controller of Verint’s Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions division. From 2003 to 2007 Erez was with Intel Corporation.

Dr Lukasiewicz-Hagai has 12 years’ experience in drug development. She joins Pluristem from Teva Global R&D, where she was director, clinical program leader, leading the global clinical development of multiple biosimilars and innovative drugs in various oncologic and neuropsychiatric indications.

Management team

Chairman and co-CEO: Zami Aberman

Mr Zami Aberman joined Pluristem in September 2005, and redirected the company’s strategy towards cellular therapeutics. Prior to Pluristem, Mr Aberman had a 30-year career as a senior executive in the high-tech industry with multiple companies in Israel, the US, Europe, Japan and Korea. Previous roles include chairman of VLScom, a private company specializing in video compression for HDTV and video over IP.

President and co-CEO: Yaky Yanay

Yaky Yanay was appointed as Pluristem’s president and chief operating officer in February 2014 and prior to that served as Pluristem’s chief financial officer and secretary since November 2006, and executive vice president since March 2013. Before joining Pluristem, Mr Yanay was the chief financial officer of Elbit Vision Systems, a public company. Prior to that Mr Yanay served as manager of audit groups of the technology sector at Ernst & Young Israel.

CFO: Erez Egozi

Erez Egozi joined Pluristem in March 2015 as vice president of finance and became CFO in March 2017. Prior to joining Pluristem, Mr Egozi spent eight years with Verint Systems Inc (Nasdaq: VRNT), serving as senior director of finance – worldwide finance controller of Verint’s Communications and Cyber Intelligence Solutions division. From 2003 to 2007 Erez was with Intel Corporation.

VP of Clinical and Medical Affairs: Esther Lukasiewicz Hagai, MD, PhD

Dr Lukasiewicz-Hagai has 12 years’ experience in drug development. She joins Pluristem from Teva Global R&D, where she was director, clinical program leader, leading the global clinical development of multiple biosimilars and innovative drugs in various oncologic and neuropsychiatric indications.

Principal shareholders

(%)

Zami Aberman

3.99%

Yaky Yanay

3.38%

Renaissance Technologies, LLC

1.46%

Menora Mivtachim Holdings

0.92%

Companies named in this report

Amgen (AMGN), Cesca Therapeutics (KOOL), Fate Therapeutics (FATE), Merck Serono (MRK.FWB), Otsuka (4578.TYO), Vericel (VCEL)


Edison is an investment research and advisory company, with offices in North America, Europe, the Middle East and AsiaPac. The heart of Edison is our world-renowned equity research platform and deep multi-sector expertise. At Edison Investment Research, our research is widely read by international investors, advisers and stakeholders. Edison Advisors leverages our core research platform to provide differentiated services including investor relations and strategic consulting. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Pty Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

EDISON ISRAEL DISCLAIMER

Disclosure regarding the scheme to enhance the awareness of investors to public companies in the technology and biomed sectors that are listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and participate in the scheme (hereinafter respectively “the Scheme”, “TASE”, “Participant” and/or “Participants”). Edison Investment Research (Israel) Ltd, the Israeli subsidiary of Edison Investment Research Ltd (hereinafter respectively “Edison Israel” and “Edison”), has entered into an agreement with the TASE for the purpose of providing research analysis (hereinafter “the Agreement”), regarding the Participants and according to the Scheme (hereinafter “the Analysis” or “Analyses”). The Analysis will be distributed and published on the TASE website (Maya), Israel Security Authority (hereinafter “the ISA”) website (Magna), and through various other distribution channels. The Analysis for each participant will be published at least four times a year, after publication of quarterly or annual financial reports, and shall be updated as necessary after publication of an immediate report with respect to the occurrence of a material event regarding a Participant. As set forth in the Agreement, Edison Israel is entitled to fees for providing its investment research services. The fees shall be paid by the Participants directly to the TASE, and TASE shall pay the fees directly to Edison. Subject to the terms and principals of the Agreement, the Annual fees that Edison Israel shall be entitled to for each Participant shall be in the range of $35,000-50,000. As set forth in the Agreement and subject to its terms, the Analyses shall include a description of the Participant and its business activities, which shall inter alia relate to matters such as: shareholders; management; products; relevant intellectual property; the business environment in which the Participant operates; the Participant's standing in such an environment including current and forecasted trends; a description of past and current financial positions of the Participant; and a forecast regarding future developments in and of such a position and any other matter which in the professional view of the Edison (as defined below) should be addressed in a research report (of the nature published) and which may affect the decision of a reasonable investor contemplating an investment in the Participant's securities. To the extent it is relevant, the Analysis shall include a schedule of scientific analysis of an expert in the field of life sciences. An "equity research abstract" shall accompany each Equity Research Report, describing the main points addressed. The full scope reports and reports where the investment case has materially changed will include a thorough analysis and discussion. Short update notes, where the investment case has not materially changed, will include a summary valuation discussion. The Agreement with TASE regarding the participation of Edison in the scheme for the research analysis of public companies does not and shall not constitute an approval or consent on the part of TASE or the ISA or any other exchange on which securities of the Company are listed, or any other securities’ regulatory authority which regulates the issuance of securities by the Company to the content of the Report or to the recommendation contained therein. A summary of this report is also published in the Hebrew language. In the event of any contradiction, inconsistency, discrepancy, ambiguity or variance between the English Report and the Hebrew summary of said Report, the English version shall prevail; and a note to this effect shall appear in any Hebrew summary of a Report. Edison is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. According to Article 12.3.2, Chapter 12 of the Conduct of Business Sourcebook, Edison, which produces or disseminates non-independent research, must ensure that it: 1) is clearly identified as a marketing communication; and 2) contains a clear and prominent statement that (or, in the case of an oral recommendation, to the effect that) it: a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research; and b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The financial promotion rules apply to non-independent research as though it were a marketing communication.

EDISON INVESTMENT RESEARCH DISCLAIMER

Copyright 2018 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Investment Research Pty Ltd (Corporate Authorised Representative (1252501) of Myonlineadvisers Pty Ltd (AFSL: 427484)) and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of Australia. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2018. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

295 Madison Avenue, 18th Floor

10017, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 8249 8342

Level 12, Office 1205

95 Pitt Street, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Tel Aviv +44 (0)20 3734 1007
Medinat Hayehudim 60

Herzilya Pituach, 46766

Israel

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

295 Madison Avenue, 18th Floor

10017, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 8249 8342

Level 12, Office 1205

95 Pitt Street, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Tel Aviv +44 (0)20 3734 1007
Medinat Hayehudim 60

Herzilya Pituach, 46766

Israel

Edison is an investment research and advisory company, with offices in North America, Europe, the Middle East and AsiaPac. The heart of Edison is our world-renowned equity research platform and deep multi-sector expertise. At Edison Investment Research, our research is widely read by international investors, advisers and stakeholders. Edison Advisors leverages our core research platform to provide differentiated services including investor relations and strategic consulting. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Pty Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

EDISON ISRAEL DISCLAIMER

Disclosure regarding the scheme to enhance the awareness of investors to public companies in the technology and biomed sectors that are listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and participate in the scheme (hereinafter respectively “the Scheme”, “TASE”, “Participant” and/or “Participants”). Edison Investment Research (Israel) Ltd, the Israeli subsidiary of Edison Investment Research Ltd (hereinafter respectively “Edison Israel” and “Edison”), has entered into an agreement with the TASE for the purpose of providing research analysis (hereinafter “the Agreement”), regarding the Participants and according to the Scheme (hereinafter “the Analysis” or “Analyses”). The Analysis will be distributed and published on the TASE website (Maya), Israel Security Authority (hereinafter “the ISA”) website (Magna), and through various other distribution channels. The Analysis for each participant will be published at least four times a year, after publication of quarterly or annual financial reports, and shall be updated as necessary after publication of an immediate report with respect to the occurrence of a material event regarding a Participant. As set forth in the Agreement, Edison Israel is entitled to fees for providing its investment research services. The fees shall be paid by the Participants directly to the TASE, and TASE shall pay the fees directly to Edison. Subject to the terms and principals of the Agreement, the Annual fees that Edison Israel shall be entitled to for each Participant shall be in the range of $35,000-50,000. As set forth in the Agreement and subject to its terms, the Analyses shall include a description of the Participant and its business activities, which shall inter alia relate to matters such as: shareholders; management; products; relevant intellectual property; the business environment in which the Participant operates; the Participant's standing in such an environment including current and forecasted trends; a description of past and current financial positions of the Participant; and a forecast regarding future developments in and of such a position and any other matter which in the professional view of the Edison (as defined below) should be addressed in a research report (of the nature published) and which may affect the decision of a reasonable investor contemplating an investment in the Participant's securities. To the extent it is relevant, the Analysis shall include a schedule of scientific analysis of an expert in the field of life sciences. An "equity research abstract" shall accompany each Equity Research Report, describing the main points addressed. The full scope reports and reports where the investment case has materially changed will include a thorough analysis and discussion. Short update notes, where the investment case has not materially changed, will include a summary valuation discussion. The Agreement with TASE regarding the participation of Edison in the scheme for the research analysis of public companies does not and shall not constitute an approval or consent on the part of TASE or the ISA or any other exchange on which securities of the Company are listed, or any other securities’ regulatory authority which regulates the issuance of securities by the Company to the content of the Report or to the recommendation contained therein. A summary of this report is also published in the Hebrew language. In the event of any contradiction, inconsistency, discrepancy, ambiguity or variance between the English Report and the Hebrew summary of said Report, the English version shall prevail; and a note to this effect shall appear in any Hebrew summary of a Report. Edison is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. According to Article 12.3.2, Chapter 12 of the Conduct of Business Sourcebook, Edison, which produces or disseminates non-independent research, must ensure that it: 1) is clearly identified as a marketing communication; and 2) contains a clear and prominent statement that (or, in the case of an oral recommendation, to the effect that) it: a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research; and b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The financial promotion rules apply to non-independent research as though it were a marketing communication.

EDISON INVESTMENT RESEARCH DISCLAIMER

Copyright 2018 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Investment Research Pty Ltd (Corporate Authorised Representative (1252501) of Myonlineadvisers Pty Ltd (AFSL: 427484)) and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of Australia. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2018. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

295 Madison Avenue, 18th Floor

10017, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 8249 8342

Level 12, Office 1205

95 Pitt Street, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Tel Aviv +44 (0)20 3734 1007
Medinat Hayehudim 60

Herzilya Pituach, 46766

Israel

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

295 Madison Avenue, 18th Floor

10017, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 8249 8342

Level 12, Office 1205

95 Pitt Street, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Tel Aviv +44 (0)20 3734 1007
Medinat Hayehudim 60

Herzilya Pituach, 46766

Israel

Snakk Media — Improved cash performance

Snakk Media has issued its Q3 KOMs, which are broadly consistent with its full-year targets, with an outperformance of the compensation to revenue ratio and a higher staff turnover than indicated. This figure, though, is highly volatile due to the small numbers involved. The company is still undergoing a review of its capital strategy and the share price is unlikely to recover until the outcome of this is published.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Edison

Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.

Sign up for free