Esker has developed a unified cloud platform to automate order-to-cash and purchase-to-pay cash cycles. Its DPA software operates in five areas: procurement, accounts payable, accounts receivable, sales order processing and document delivery. These can be combined to fulfil the cash cycles as per Exhibit 1: order-to-cash to fulfil customer orders and collect payment; and purchase-to-pay to source, order and pay for goods and services.
Exhibit 1: Esker’s positioning
|
|
|
Features of the software include:
■
multi-tenant cloud platform;
■
single solution with common interface to access all functionality;
■
enterprise resource planning (ERP) integrations;
■
artificial intelligence (AI) functionality; and
■
ongoing development via agile methodology.
Automating invoice and order delivery and receipt
Esker’s DPA software operates in the following way. For receipt of documents (eg sales orders, supplier invoices), the software converts paper documentation into digital format and populates standard templates with the data from the digital document. The software can also extract data from other sources such as emails, email attachments and faxes. Esker has used machine learning for many years to train the software: if there is any doubt over the accuracy of the data, the user compares the original document to the digitised version and corrects it as necessary helping the software to learn. The standardised data can then be fed into the customer’s ERP system and processed and viewed by the relevant people throughout the organisation before being archived automatically. For sending documents, the software generates orders or invoices in the format required and if paper documents or fax services are required, Esker’s document delivery service can be used. The software provides a dashboard showing relevant key performance indicators (KPIs) and data analytics to support performance monitoring.
The software has certified integrations with the main ERP vendors, including SAP (including S/4HANA), Cegid, Oracle’s E-Business Suite, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, Sage, Infor and NetSuite. Earlier this year, Esker announced that it had partnered with Cegid to provide its supplier invoice processing software for Cegid’s XRP Flex solution.
Esker’s mobile solution, Esker Anywhere, can be used for procurement, accounts payable and sales order processing.
The business helps buyers and suppliers to collaborate by providing a portal for each process that they can both access, with features such as invoice status and chat. More recently, using AI it has developed a shared database of document recognition models for orders and invoices in pdf format. The longer-term goal is to connect these portals together to create a networking platform that would allow customers and suppliers to interact securely and could be used for direct exchange of purchase orders and invoices, payment of invoices, early payment discounting, dispute resolution and data clarification.
Enhancing cash and credit management processes for accounts receivable
The software offers self-service online payment options such as credit cards, ACH, SEPA and direct debit, or can be integrated with the customer’s preferred payment processor. The software also manages cash allocation automatically. The company recently integrated its order-to-cash software with Stripe Connect to offer the convenience of a single payment provider globally.
In June, Esker launched a credit management solution that allows companies to automate new customer on-boarding and secure their credit approval process. The solution includes customisable credit application templates, workflow rules and a customisable dashboard to monitor application status and tasks. Periodic credit reviews can be automated and a customer repository includes all customer-related documents, credit and business information to make informed decisions. Esker has partnered with Dun & Bradstreet globally, CreditRiskMonitor in North America and Ellisphere in Europe to provide access to external credit data.
Document delivery the final step in the process
Document delivery services enable customers to send business documents via cloud fax or mail centres directly from their desktop or enterprise applications. Esker services on-demand document delivery through its fax servers located in France, the US and Australia and mail production centres located in France, Belgium, the UK, the US, Australia, Spain and Singapore.
Demand drivers: Efficiency, cash management, regulation
The software improves productivity by accelerating the cash conversion cycle, reducing errors, enabling faster processing, improving process visibility and improving customer service. It has the added benefit of reducing paper and paper-related costs.
The software also meets government legislation around e-invoicing. In Europe, the EU has mandated that paper and digital invoices should be treated equally and lays out ways that documents can be authenticated. EU member states have been subject to the 2014/55/EU directive since April 2019: this specifies that businesses selling to government entities must use e-invoicing that is based on specified interoperability standards. This should increase demand for e-invoicing solutions. In Latin America, e-invoicing is government-mandated to ensure tax compliance and collection.
SaaS-based software driving growth
Exhibit 2: DPA product range
Product |
Details |
Esker on Demand |
On demand DPA platform for outsourcing and automating the enterprise process linked to the circulation of documents (invoicing, reminders, sales administration). Supports the following processes: accounts payable, accounts receivable, procurement, sales orders. |
CalvaEDI |
Designed for transport decision-makers, manufacturers, freight forwarders, logistic services and haulers to automatically exchange shipping orders in real time in the EDI (electronic data interchange) format. |
Esker EDI Services |
Enables industrial companies to exchange different business documents (orders, order confirmations, delivery slips, payment notices, inventory reports, consignment notes, etc) in EDI format with their partners. |
TermSync |
Cloud-based service for managing the accounts receivable collection process for customer invoices issued by Esker on Demand or a third-party solution. |
FlyDoc |
Online fax and mail delivery service; targeted at SMEs and individuals. Only in France and the US. |
Product |
Esker on Demand |
CalvaEDI |
Esker EDI Services |
TermSync |
FlyDoc |
Details |
On demand DPA platform for outsourcing and automating the enterprise process linked to the circulation of documents (invoicing, reminders, sales administration). Supports the following processes: accounts payable, accounts receivable, procurement, sales orders. |
Designed for transport decision-makers, manufacturers, freight forwarders, logistic services and haulers to automatically exchange shipping orders in real time in the EDI (electronic data interchange) format. |
Enables industrial companies to exchange different business documents (orders, order confirmations, delivery slips, payment notices, inventory reports, consignment notes, etc) in EDI format with their partners. |
Cloud-based service for managing the accounts receivable collection process for customer invoices issued by Esker on Demand or a third-party solution. |
Online fax and mail delivery service; targeted at SMEs and individuals. Only in France and the US. |
The table above details Esker’s product range for DPA, all of which are SaaS-based. Esker on Demand is the main product; this multi-tenant solution was originally developed by Esker in 2004, ahead of many other software companies’ entries into the SaaS market. It started to gain traction from 2009 as customers were attracted by the lack of upfront investment and the usage-based payment mechanism. The company has more than 6,000 SaaS customers and 600,000 SaaS users.
Esker upgrades Esker on Demand every 15 days. The software is hosted out of six data centres: two leased by Esker (France, US) and four Microsoft Azure facilities (Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Singapore).
Esker’s longest-standing product, DeliveryWare, is an on-premise solution. The company discontinued new sales of this product in September 2019; we would expect related maintenance revenues to slowly decline. In FY19, DeliveryWare-related revenues made up 6% of group revenue.
The table below shows the development of the platform in terms of functionality.
Exhibit 3: Product development roadmap
Media types |
Document types |
Processes |
People |
Finance |
EDI |
✓ |
Purchase orders |
✓ |
Order processing |
✓ |
Portals |
✓ |
Payment |
✓ |
Fax |
✓ |
Customer invoices |
✓ |
Accounts receivable |
✓ |
Collaboration |
|
Dynamic discounting |
|
Email |
✓ |
Supplier invoices |
✓ |
Accounts payable |
✓ |
Mobile app |
✓ |
Reverse factoring |
|
Mail |
✓ |
|
|
Purchasing |
✓ |
Business network |
|
Factoring |
|
SMS |
✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Esker, Edison Investment Research. Key: ✓ = available; = under development/partially available.
We understand that the company’s main priorities for product development include:
■
Employing artificial intelligence to increase automation. Esker has used machine learning for many years to improve the accuracy of its software in automating invoice processing. It also incorporates robotic process automation into its software in selected areas, for example to automate invoice submission to a customer’s accounts payable portal or to retrieve sales orders from portals and input them into a customer’s ERP system. It is applying deep learning, which requires access to a very high volume of documents, to a number of use cases. For example, it is using deep learning to classify and route documents received in an email inbox (‘triage’). The software needs to be able not only to figure out which department a document is intended for, but also to reject documents that are spam. The goal is to achieve accuracy on a par with a human; this then frees up the software user to focus their attention on exceptions rather than routine email sorting. Other AI-based enhancements to the platform include auto-splitting of batch invoices, semantic recognition of purchase orders and anomaly detection. The company is developing new enhancements in the area of fraud detection, semantic recognition of other documents and non-OCR recognition of documents.
■
Extending the functionality of the P2P solution: Esker is increasingly adding functionality to its purchase-to-pay offering, through a combination of in-house development and technology partnerships, and is focusing its efforts on the functionality demanded by customers. One area of demand is catalogue management: Esker already offers ‘punch out’ functionality, which allows purchasing customers to access online suppliers such as Dell and Amazon Business from within the Esker e-procurement application and place orders with those suppliers. The company continues to add features in this area. In June, Esker added supplier management functionality. A self-service portal allows suppliers to provide all required account information and documentation and keep it up-to-date. The software verifies the accuracy of supplier information and uses third-party data to monitor supplier risk. Contract management functionality is also being developed so that invoices and purchase orders can be linked to the related contract.
■
Supply chain finance: as an interesting add-on to its existing software business, Esker has evaluated the supply chain financing market to assess the best way to participate. Several invoice networks are active in this space, for example Taulia and Tungsten, offering invoice factoring, reverse factoring and/or dynamic discounting. Rather than offering finance itself (not a core skill of the company), Esker has entered the market via a partnership in Singapore. If this proves popular, Esker would look to extend this type of offering in other countries.
Partnering to access niche technology
As well as in-house product development and acquisitions of companies with relevant technology, Esker partners with other companies to provide access to technology that augments its products. One example is Rimilia, a UK-based company with a SaaS-based product that provides automatic matching of cash receipts to invoices for Esker’s order-to-cash solution. Last year, Esker made a 40% investment in the initial seed finance round for a US start-up called B/2BNOW, which has since changed its name to Highview. Highview provides EDI solutions for SAP S/4HANA Cloud ERP systems. Steve Smith, COO of Esker US, joined the board of Highview.
Sales strategy: Mainly direct, adding channel partners
Esker has a direct sales presence in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK), the US and Asia-Pacific (Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore). Esker has sales representatives in Miami (to target South America, in particular Argentina, Brazil and Colombia), Brussels (to target European-headquartered US companies) and Montreal. Esker also sells its software to several companies on a white-label basis.
The salesforce tends to target those responsible for business processes; in most cases this will be the finance department, although sometimes it is customer services. The company also works with the customer’s IT department, but this is mainly to work on integrating the software rather than to sell to. As the implementation process takes time and can be disruptive, most customers tend to select Esker for one process initially. Esker may then benefit from growth within that process eg more departments, more geographies. Some customers go on to use Esker for additional processes. Last year, the company created a customer experience team to strengthen the relationship with customers and to minimise churn.
Signing up channel partners
Excluding the effect of COVID-19 on demand, the main gating factor for Esker’s growth is the availability of consultants. To accelerate the pace at which it can sign up and on-board new customers, Esker is developing a network of channel partners. These partners are providing consulting and implementation services, and in some cases are reselling Esker’s technology.
Key partners include:
■
Fuji Xerox: Esker announced an agreement with Fuji Xerox in early 2019 whereby Fuji Xerox would initially market Esker’s accounts payable automation solution as part of its offering to optimise accounts payable management processes in Japan, with a view to extending this to Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore. Both parties were already working together in New Zealand with customers in the construction, retail, business and education sectors using Esker’s accounts payable solution. The agreement also included the provision of consulting, implementation and support services by Fuji Xerox, potentially accelerating Esker’s penetration of this region without Esker incurring substantial sales and consulting costs. In March 2020, Esker announced that the partnership was being extended to include the accounts receivable solution.
■
KPMG Netherlands: In 2019, the company signed a reseller agreement with KPMG Netherlands. KPMG will market Esker’s cloud-based accounts payable solution as part of its RPA and Finance Transformation offering.
■
Cegid: As mentioned earlier, Esker’s software is distributed by Cegid via its XRP Flex Marketplace.
The company noted in its H120 results that it has signed several deals in Japan via the Fuji Xerox partnership. While these are small in terms of revenue, they provide Esker with the opportunity to learn and adapt product to suit customers in the Japanese market.
Joint venture with Quadient targets SMEs
Esker sold its software on a white-label basis through Quadient (previously called Neopost) in France for several years and in 2015 entered into a joint venture (JV) with Quadient to expand the scope of this agreement. The JV (owned 70% Quadient, 30% Esker) is focused on selling Esker’s software, marketed as Neotouch, to SMEs in France, the US and the UK (Esker’s direct salesforce tends not to target the SME market) and to date has c 3,500 end customers. Neotouch is a hybrid mail solution, converting internet mail into physical form for transfer to postal services. In FY19, Esker reported a €0.5m contribution from its share in the JV, and the JV generated 10.2% of group sales.
Competitive positioning: Esker competes by process
Esker competes against a different group of companies for each business process and by geography. As well as specialist DPA software companies, the company also sees competition from business process outsourcers such as Accenture and Xerox.
Most of the companies that Esker competes with operate in either the order-to-cash or purchase-to-pay markets. Esker has the advantage that its software can be used across all processes, reducing the number of software suppliers a company deals with and simplifying the implementation process. More than 6,000 companies globally use Esker software, including BMW, GE Healthcare, Heineken, Microsoft, Novartis, Samsung and Siemens. Esker has more than a decade’s experience in SaaS delivery and has achieved various SaaS certifications such as SSAE18, ISAE3402 and ISO27001, providing a level of confidence regarding business continuity and data security.
Accounts payable is the most competitive area; when Esker wins business it tends to be for customers that have decided to move from manual to automated processing, rather than winning business from an existing supplier (although this occasionally happens). Accounts receivable has historically been Esker’s strongest area; the customer owns the process so the document format is set in-house and therefore data recognition is more straightforward. Due to European legislation around electronic signatures, demand for automated accounts receivable processing is growing, as companies move from paper to digital invoices. Esker sometimes replaces mail houses in this market. The most complex market from a technical perspective is sales order processing. This is because end-customers send orders to Esker’s customers in many different non-standard formats such as faxes, emails or within email attachments. This market has the fewest suppliers and Esker has a very high win rate. The newest area for Esker is purchasing (launched in 2014), which contributes less than 1% of revenues. This is a sub-set of the procurement software market, which is dominated by cloud provider Coupa. Esker’s purchasing solution covers the procurement process from purchase requisition to invoice payment authorisation, but over time we expect the company to extend the functionality of the solution to encompass the earlier part of the procurement process. Esker typically sells this solution to existing accounts payable customers to support the full purchase-to-payment cycle.
Exhibit 4: Competitive environment – DPA software suppliers
Company |
Accounts receivable |
Sales order processing |
Accounts payable |
Purchasing |
Esker |
x |
x |
x |
x |
Basware |
x |
|
x |
x |
bill.com |
x |
|
|
|
Billtrust |
x |
|
|
|
Conexiom |
|
x |
|
|
Coupa |
|
|
|
x |
Determine |
|
|
|
x |
HighRadius |
x |
|
|
|
ITESOFT |
|
|
x |
|
iValua |
|
|
|
x |
Kofax* |
|
|
x |
|
OmPrompt |
|
x |
|
|
OpenText |
|
x |
x |
|
SAP (Ariba) |
|
|
|
x |
Sidetrade |
X |
|
|
|
Tradeshift |
X |
|
x |
|
Tungsten (OB10) |
x |
|
|
|
Yooz |
|
|
x |
|
Source: Esker, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Includes ReadSoft.
Exhibit 4 shows the most common competitors for each process. Competition tends to be country specific; for example, Billtrust for accounts receivable in the US, ITESOFT for accounts payable in France. Global competitors include Basware, Kofax, OpenText and SAP.
Document delivery has a different group of mail-focused competitors, including j2 Global, Docapost, and Maileva (both subsidiaries of Le Groupe La Poste) and OpenText.
Supplier/buyer networks present an opportunity for Esker
Many customers use Esker’s software to enable them to join supplier networks such as Ariba or OB10. These networks usually require e-invoicing and Esker’s software enables them to produce invoices according to the requirements of the networks. In other cases, such as Taulia, the networks rely on invoices that are approved for payment to provide supply chain financing. As Esker’s software provides dashboards to show this type of information, the company is able to introduce customers with the necessary volume of approved invoices to the networks.
Revenues: SaaS business is the driver
Exhibit 5: Revenues by business line and by type
€m |
FY17 |
FY18 |
Growth |
FY19 |
Growth |
FY20e |
Growth |
FY21e |
Growth |
SaaS-related DPA revenues |
64.4 |
75.8 |
17.6% |
93.7 |
23.7% |
106.0 |
13.1% |
124.9 |
17.8% |
License-based DPA revenues |
8.1 |
7.8 |
(3.3%) |
6.6 |
(16.1%) |
5.6 |
(14.6%) |
4.9 |
(12.0%) |
Legacy products |
3.6 |
3.3 |
(9.1%) |
3.9 |
19.9% |
2.3 |
(41.4%) |
2.0 |
(13.0%) |
Total |
76.1 |
86.9 |
14.2% |
104.2 |
19.9% |
113.9 |
9.3% |
131.8 |
15.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SaaS |
51.4 |
60.5 |
17.7% |
75.5 |
24.8% |
86.5 |
14.5% |
103.8 |
20.0% |
Consulting |
14.4 |
16.6 |
15.7% |
18.9 |
13.7% |
19.3 |
2.0% |
21.2 |
10.0% |
Upgrades & maintenance |
8.0 |
7.4 |
(8.3%) |
6.9 |
(6.1%) |
6.5 |
(6.0%) |
5.6 |
(13.5%) |
New licenses |
1.6 |
1.9 |
15.4% |
2.4 |
28.7% |
1.5 |
(40.0%) |
1.1 |
(27.5%) |
Fax card sales/hardware |
0.6 |
0.5 |
(22.3%) |
0.4 |
(11.9%) |
0.2 |
(50.0%) |
0.2 |
(20.0%) |
Total |
76.1 |
86.9 |
|
104.2 |
|
113.9 |
|
131.8 |
|
Source: Esker, Edison Investment Research
Esker reports revenues in two ways:
■
split by business line: DPA (split out as SaaS and licence-based) and Legacy Products, on a quarterly basis; and
■
split by type of revenue: SaaS, maintenance fees, licence sales, hardware and consulting, on a half-yearly basis.
SaaS revenues are generated on a per-transaction basis from all SaaS DPA products customers. Licence and maintenance fees are generated from DeliveryWare on-premise licence sales and the fax server and host access businesses (although as DeliveryWare has been discontinued there will no longer be any licence sales from this product). Hardware sales are generated by the fax server business. Consulting revenues are generated from on-premise and on-demand DPA business. Older DPA subscription sales were structured on a traffic-only basis, with consulting revenues charged for the initial integration of the software. For the last few years, Esker has sold on a hybrid subscription model that guarantees minimum monthly revenues plus transaction-based revenues, reducing Esker’s dependence on the speed at which a customer implements the software. On-demand contracts are typically signed for a minimum of 12 months, and most commonly are for three years. See Exhibit 5 for historical and forecast divisional performance.
SaaS-related revenues (which include SaaS and consulting revenues) have shown significant growth in recent years. On a like-for-like, constant currency basis, these grew 21% in FY17, 20% in FY18, 21% in FY19 and 11% in H120 (SaaS +9%, consulting +15%). Licence-based DPA revenues (licences, consulting and maintenance revenues) declined 23% in FY17, 1% in FY18, 18% in FY19 and 15% in H120, now making up only 5% of revenues.
High level of recurring revenue provides good visibility
In H120, recurring revenues made up 80% of the total, versus 78% in FY18 and 79% in FY19. Esker has a strong record of retaining customers – management estimates that churn is less than 1% per year. As each new customer comes on board, this adds another layer of recurring revenues. In H120, Esker won orders worth €12m (+3% y-o-y); this is the amount of revenue the company is contracted to earn over the (usually) three-year life of the contract, and does not include variable per document fees, which can make up the same amount again over the three years. This was a strong performance considering the difficulties in signing new business during Q2.
Review of H120 results: A robust performance
Exhibit 6: Half year results highlights
€m |
H119 |
H120 |
y-o-y |
Revenues |
50.1 |
54.2 |
8.2% |
EBITDA |
10.9 |
10.2 |
-6.4% |
EBITDA margin |
21.7% |
18.8% |
-2.9% |
Reported operating profit |
7.2 |
6.2 |
-14.0% |
Operating margin |
14.4% |
11.4% |
-3.0% |
Reported net income |
5.5 |
5.4 |
-0.5% |
Basic EPS (€) |
1.02 |
0.96 |
-5.9% |
Diluted EPS (€) |
1.00 |
0.96 |
-4.0% |
Net cash |
15.0 |
22.9 |
52.7% |
Esker generated 8.2% y-o-y revenue growth for H120 (7% constant currency), despite COVID-19 disruption. On a quarterly basis, Q120 was 16% higher on a constant currency basis whereas Q220 revenues were flat. Consulting revenues were robust in the period (+15%) as a backlog of projects meant that consultants were fully utilised as they were able to undertake implementation projects from home. SaaS revenues were 9% higher year-on-year; while the US and Asia-Pacific were more robust and benefited from new customers coming onboard, Europe was hit harder by lockdowns in Q2. We note that SaaS revenues are made up of monthly subscription fees, which continued unaffected by COVID-19, and volume-based fees, which declined c 24% in April and May, as companies processed fewer invoices during lockdown.
The company slightly slowed the pace of hiring during H1, but still grew headcount 6% h-o-h and 14% y-o-y. This resulted in staff costs increasing 20% y-o-y. Other operating costs (excluding depreciation and amortisation) fell 6% y-o-y, as travel and marketing costs fell significantly in Q2 and a higher level of development costs were capitalised (although the percentage of R&D costs capitalised remained flat at 63%). Overall, this resulted in a 14% decline in reported operating profit and a 3pp decline in the operating margin year-on-year.
Until March, the JV with Quadient (see above) was on a growth path, but as it involves physical mail, COVID-19 disruption (particularly in France) drove a decline in business for the JV of c 35% in H120. The contribution to Esker of €174k in H120 therefore declined from the €251k in H119 and €272k in H219.
France recently updated its tax rules to allow software companies to take advantage of its patent box regime. This reduces the tax rate on profits from copyrighted software resulting from R&D in France from 31% to 10%. This resulted in a one-off tax credit of €852k for FY19 (reported as exceptional income in H120) and reduced the effective tax rate from 31% to 27% in H120.
In H1, the company generated operating cash flow of €9.5m. As well as paying the prior-year dividend of €1.9m, the company paid down €1.5m of debt and took advantage of a government-guaranteed loan of €11.5m (one-year maturity, 0.5% rate).
The company invests in tangible fixed assets for its mail centres and offices and capitalises development costs. In H1, Esker capitalised €4.0m of development costs and amortised €2.6m and spent €1.2m on tangible assets. We expect a gradual increase in both capitalisation and amortisation in FY20 and FY21 reflecting the growing R&D headcount.
Gross cash was €33.8m at period end (excluding a further €5.7m recorded in fixed assets), providing ample funds for acquisitions and investment. The company ended H120 with a net cash position of €22.9m, up from €21.0m at the end of FY19. We forecast that net cash will increase to €26.0m by the end of FY20 and €33.0m by the end of FY21.
We have slightly reduced our revenue forecasts reflecting company guidance for FY20 for constant currency revenue growth of c 9%. Management expects growth to return to more normal rates in FY21. We have reflected the new tax rates of 27% (down from 31%) for FY20 and FY21. Overall, this results in a 1.5% increase in our FY20 normalised diluted EPS forecast and a 6.5% increase in FY21.
Exhibit 7: Changes to forecasts
€m |
FY20e old |
FY20e new |
Change |
y-o-y |
FY21e old |
FY21e new |
change |
y-o-y |
Revenues |
114.8 |
113.9 |
(0.7%) |
9.3% |
132.9 |
131.8 |
(0.8%) |
15.7% |
EBITDA |
22.0 |
22.2 |
1.2% |
10.9% |
25.9 |
26.2 |
1.3% |
17.8% |
EBITDA margin |
19.2% |
19.5% |
0.4% |
0.3% |
19.5% |
19.9% |
0.4% |
0.4% |
Normalised EBIT |
14.0 |
14.0 |
(0.4%) |
8.8% |
17.2 |
17.3 |
0.7% |
24.1% |
Normalised EBIT margin |
12.2% |
12.3% |
0.0% |
(0.1%) |
12.9% |
13.2% |
0.2% |
0.9% |
Reported EBIT |
13.7 |
13.5 |
(1.0%) |
9.6% |
16.9 |
16.9 |
0.3% |
24.9% |
Reported EBIT margin |
11.9% |
11.9% |
(0.0%) |
0.0% |
12.7% |
12.8% |
0.1% |
0.9% |
Normalised PBT |
14.7 |
14.1 |
(4.1%) |
3.6% |
17.9 |
18.0 |
0.7% |
27.8% |
Normalised net income |
10.2 |
10.3 |
1.5% |
2.0% |
12.4 |
13.2 |
6.5% |
27.8% |
Normalised dil. EPS (€) |
1.73 |
1.76 |
1.5% |
(1.7%) |
2.07 |
2.21 |
6.5% |
25.6% |
Reported basic EPS (€) |
1.75 |
1.88 |
7.0% |
4.4% |
2.10 |
2.23 |
6.1% |
19.0% |
Reported diluted EPS (€) |
1.69 |
1.81 |
7.0% |
5.3% |
2.03 |
2.16 |
6.1% |
19.1% |
Net cash |
26.8 |
26.0 |
(3.1%) |
23.7% |
33.5 |
33.0 |
(1.3%) |
27.1% |
DPS (€) |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.0% |
6.1% |
0.40 |
0.40 |
0.0% |
14.3% |
Source: Edison Investment Research
With 37% of revenues from the US but a lower proportion of the cost base in US dollars, the company is exposed to changes in the dollar-euro exchange rate. In our cost calculations, we use a rate of $1.125/€ for FY20 and FY21. Any weakening of the dollar could have a material negative impact on our forecasts.