Investment process: Long-term strategic, diversified allocation
Each year, HVPE’s investment manager assesses forecast cash flows and investment returns to establish an appropriate overall level of new commitments to be made to HarbourVest funds over the next 12 months, with the aim of optimising long-term returns for HVPE shareholders. Following board approval, commitments are made with a view to maximising the benefit of available early-closing fee discounts on the selected HarbourVest funds, while ensuring that HVPE remains within a set of agreed balance sheet ratios.
The level of commitment allocated to individual funds is determined with reference to HVPE’s longer-term strategic asset allocation targets (see Exhibit 3). These were revised in February 2018 to reflect the opportunities in direct co-investments as well as the desire to capture the uncorrelated returns available from real asset investments. The strategic allocations comprise a set of rolling five-year portfolio construction targets by investment stage, geography and strategy, as a proportion of NAV. The targets take into account macroeconomic and geopolitical factors, the available opportunity set, historical performance and HarbourVest’s specific areas of expertise.
Exhibit 3: HVPE strategic asset allocation targets – revised February 2018
Stage |
% |
|
Geography |
% |
|
Strategy |
% |
Buyout |
60 |
|
US |
65 |
|
Primary |
55 |
Venture and growth equity |
30 |
|
Europe (incl UK) |
18 |
|
Secondary |
25 |
Mezzanine and real assets |
10 |
|
Asia Pacific |
12 |
|
Direct |
20 |
|
|
|
Rest of world |
5 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
Source: HarbourVest Global Private Equity, Edison Investment Research
HVPE aims to maintain a consistent rate of investment, which ensures that portfolio investments are well spread by vintage, both at the fund level and the underlying portfolio company level. This approach is enhanced by HVPE’s fund-of-funds structure, with commitments made by HVPE to HarbourVest funds being allocated over three to four years to selected third-party managers, who then invest in operating companies over the following three to five years. Over time, this strategy has resulted in a portfolio that is diversified across the different phases of the investment cycle (see Exhibit 7). The investment phase is when capital is drawn down by underlying managers to build their portfolios; the growth phase is the majority of the life of the underlying investment; and the mature phase is when portfolio companies are prepared for sale and realisations are achieved through trade sales, sales to other financial/private market investors, or companies becoming publicly listed.
HarbourVest conducts extensive due diligence on third-party managers prior to making investment commitments to new funds. Primary commitments are made to funds at launch, after consideration of the fund manager’s investment skills, leadership and track record, the fund’s investment focus and strategy, contractual terms, fund size, expected duration, exposure limits and fees. A bottom-up valuation of portfolio companies is completed on secondary purchases (whole or part portfolios of maturing investments), with the capabilities of the underlying fund manager also assessed. Bottom-up valuations are also carried out on prospective direct investments – usually co-investments alongside managers of underlying portfolio funds. The HarbourVest platform spans all three strategies, allowing the investment teams to leverage each other’s knowledge and insights, which gives HarbourVest a distinct competitive edge when negotiating deals and making commitments.
Current portfolio positioning
HVPE has a broadly diversified private markets portfolio, which comprised 42 HarbourVest funds and two direct secondary co-investments at end-January 2018. The portfolio provides exposure to over 800 underlying funds and partnerships, which are invested in over 7,500 operating companies. While highly diversified in terms of the total number of underlying investee companies, HVPE’s portfolio has a significant degree of concentration in the larger holdings, which allows the performance of individual portfolio companies to have a material effect on HVPE’s returns.
As shown in Exhibit 1, four companies each represented 1.0% or more of the portfolio (compared with seven a year earlier), with the top 10 underlying holdings accounting for 9.5% of the portfolio (compared with 11.8% a year earlier). While the portfolio was slightly less concentrated in the larger holdings than a year earlier, this primarily reflected the sale of HVPE’s previously largest holding Lightower Fiber Networks, which represented 2.14% of the end-January 2017 portfolio. At end-January 2018, portfolio concentration in the top five, 25, 100 and 1,000 underlying holdings was 6.0%, 17.3%, 36.3% and 86% respectively. As shown in Exhibit 4, the top 10 HarbourVest funds in the portfolio are broadly diversified by phase, vintage, stage, region and strategy, and accounted for 56.5% of HVPE’s portfolio at end-January 2018, which compares with 63.8% a year earlier.
Exhibit 4: Top 10 HarbourVest funds by investment value at end-January 2018
Fund |
Phase |
Vintage |
Stage |
Region |
Strategy |
Unfunded commitment (US$m) |
Amount invested (US$m) |
Distributions received (US$m) |
Fair value (US$m) |
% of portfolio |
% of NAV |
HIPEP VI Partnership Fund |
Mature |
2008 |
Buyout/ venture |
Europe/ AsiaPac/ RoW |
Primary |
9.9 |
114.4 |
49.7 |
124.2 |
8.6 |
7.2 |
HarbourVest VIII Buyout |
Mature |
2006 |
Buyout |
US |
Primary/ secondary/ direct |
11.3 |
241.5 |
278.9 |
116.4 |
8.0 |
6.8 |
HarbourVest 2013 Direct Fund |
Growth |
2013 |
Buyout/ venture |
Global |
Direct |
3.2 |
97.1 |
42.7 |
108.0 |
7.4 |
6.3 |
Dover Street VIII |
Growth |
2012 |
Buyout/ venture |
Global |
Secondary |
22.5 |
157.6 |
155.2 |
83.8 |
5.8 |
4.9 |
HarbourVest Global Annual Private Equity Fund |
Investment |
2014 |
Buyout/ venture/ other |
Global |
Primary/ secondary/ direct |
30.3 |
69.7 |
16.1 |
79.6 |
5.5 |
4.6 |
HarbourVest Partners IX Venture Fund |
Growth |
2011 |
Venture |
US |
Primary/ secondary/ direct |
8.1 |
62.3 |
23.6 |
70.0 |
4.8 |
4.1 |
HIPEP VII Partnership Fund |
Investment |
2014 |
Buyout/ venture |
Europe/ AsiaPac/ RoW |
Primary/ secondary/ direct |
66.6 |
58.4 |
6.0 |
66.9 |
4.6 |
3.9 |
HarbourVest 2015 Global Fund |
Investment |
2015 |
Buyout/ venture/ other |
Global |
Primary/ secondary/ direct |
47.5 |
52.5 |
6.6 |
60.9 |
4.2 |
3.6 |
HarbourVest Partners Co-Investment IV |
Investment |
2016 |
Buyout/ venture |
Global |
Direct |
47.5 |
52.5 |
0.0 |
59.4 |
4.1 |
3.5 |
HIPEP VI Asia Pacific Fund |
Mature |
2008 |
Buyout/ venture |
Asia Pacific |
Primary |
3.3 |
46.9 |
20.1 |
50.7 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
Top 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
250.1 |
953.0 |
599.0 |
820.1 |
56.5 |
47.8 |
Source: HarbourVest Global Private Equity, Edison Investment Research. Note: Mature phase includes vintage years pre-2008, growth phase 2009 to 2013, and investment phase 2014 to 2018.
Although in aggregate the HarbourVest funds may be invested in a number of funds run by the same third-party manager, HVPE’s portfolio is broadly diversified by fund manager, with no manager accounting for more than 2.6% of the portfolio at end-January 2018, and the top 10 managers representing 14.6% of the portfolio. As shown in Exhibit 5, the top 10 third-party managers in the portfolio are broadly diversified by region, strategy and investment stage.
Exhibit 5: Top 10 third-party managers by investment value at end-January 2018
Manager |
Region |
Strategy |
Stage |
% of portfolio |
Investment value (US$m) |
IDG Capital Partners |
Asia |
Secondary |
Venture |
2.60 |
37.8 |
Thoma Bravo |
US |
Primary |
Mid-cap buyout |
1.85 |
26.8 |
Compass Partners |
Europe |
Secondary |
Mid- to large-cap buyout |
1.49 |
21.6 |
Index Ventures |
Europe |
Primary |
Venture and growth |
1.41 |
20.5 |
Hellman & Friedman |
US |
Primary |
Large-cap buyout |
1.40 |
20.4 |
Insight Venture Management |
US |
Primary |
Growth |
1.38 |
20.0 |
CapVest Equity Partners |
Europe |
Secondary |
Mid-cap buyout |
1.33 |
19.4 |
The Blackstone Group |
US |
Primary |
Buyout |
1.12 |
16.2 |
Lightspeed Venture Partners |
US |
Primary |
Venture |
1.04 |
15.1 |
Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe |
US |
Secondary |
Mid-cap buyout |
1.02 |
14.8 |
Top 10 (% of portfolio) |
|
|
|
14.64 |
212.6 |
Source: HarbourVest Global Private Equity, Edison Investment Research
Exhibit 6 shows HVPE’s portfolio exposure at end-April 2018, illustrating the broad diversification by geography and industry. Compared with end-April 2017, US exposure has declined by 7pp, offset by 4pp and 3pp increases in exposure to Asia Pacific and Europe. These changes would be expected to reverse over the medium term, as the portfolio moves closer to the geographic strategic allocation targets (see Exhibit 3), which were not changed in the February 2018 revision.
Exhibit 6: HVPE portfolio exposure by geography and industry at end-April 2018
|
Geographic diversification by value of underlying portfolio funds |
Industry diversification by value of underlying portfolio companies |
|
|
Source: HarbourVest Global Private Equity, Edison Investment Research
|
HVPE has provided a more detailed industry exposure analysis of the portfolio since October 2017 and, while it is not possible to make a direct comparison of the end-April 2018 exposures with a year earlier, the overall exposures appear broadly similar. Over the six months to end-April 2018, the most significant changes in exposure were a 3pp decline in media & telecom and a 2pp increase in tech & software, with no other changes in industry exposure of more than 1pp.
Exhibit 7: HVPE portfolio profile at end-April 2018
Stage |
% |
|
Phase |
% |
|
Strategy |
% |
Buyout |
60 |
|
Investment |
46 |
|
Primary |
46 |
Venture and growth equity |
32 |
|
Growth |
31 |
|
Secondary |
31 |
Mezzanine and real assets |
8 |
|
Mature |
23 |
|
Direct |
23 |
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
Source: HarbourVest Global Private Equity, Edison Investment Research
Exhibit 7 shows HVPE’s portfolio profile by stage, phase and strategy at end-April 2018. Compared with a year earlier, the most significant changes were an 8pp reduction in mature phase exposure, offset by 5pp and 3pp increases in the investment and growth phases, reflecting the natural realisation of mature investments, with proceeds being drawn down for new investments. Over the year, buyout exposure declined by 3pp, offset by 2pp and 1pp increases in exposure to venture and growth equity, and mezzanine and real assets, respectively. Similar to the geographical exposures, the investment stage and strategy exposures should be expected to trend towards the strategic allocation targets (see Exhibit 3) over the medium term.
Commitments and financial resources
HVPE committed a total of US$340m to four newly formed HarbourVest funds in FY18:
■
US$170m to HIPEP VIII Partnership Fund – an international fund of funds
■
US$50m to HIPEP VIII Asia Pacific Fund – an Asia-focused fund of funds
■
US$100m to HarbourVest 2017 Global Fund – a global multi-strategy fund of funds
■
US$20m to Secondary Overflow Fund III – a global opportunistic secondary fund
During FY18, HVPE invested US$313m through capital calls to fund underlying investments (US$212m to primary funds, US$52m to secondary funds and US$49m to direct co-investment funds) and received US$405m from realisations (US$217m from primary funds, US$91m from secondary funds, US$77m from direct co-investment funds and US$20m from secondary co-investments). The higher level of distributions relative to capital calls reflected the wider private equity market, where exit activity outpaced the rate of new investment.
At end-April 2018, HVPE held US$208m in cash, with its undrawn US$500m credit facility giving it a total of US$708m in short-term liquidity. This compared to its investment pipeline of US$1,282m.
Three key ratios are used to assess HVPE’s commitment levels:
■
Total commitment ratio (TCR) – the sum of the current investment portfolio and total investment pipeline as a percentage of NAV. This ratio provides a measure of total private markets exposure and is a key determinant of HVPE’s total commitment capacity for new HarbourVest funds and co-investments within a given period. At end-April 2018, HVPE’s TCR was 163%, slightly lower than its end-April 2017 level of 171%.
■
Commitment coverage ratio (CCR) – the sum of cash and available credit as a percentage of the total investment pipeline. This ratio is used as a measure of balance sheet risk. HVPE’s listed private equity peers typically have a shorter-term investment pipeline, which means that HVPE’s CCR may appear relatively low in comparison. At end-April 2018, HVPE’s CCR was 55%, the same level as at end-April 2017.
■
Rolling coverage ratio (RCR) – the sum of cash, available credit and projected realisation proceeds expected to be received in the next 12 months as a percentage of expected cash investment over the next 36 months. Considering forecast investments over a three-year period, rather than the total investment pipeline, makes the RCR a more equivalent ratio for comparison of HVPE’s commitment coverage relative to its peers. At end-April 2018, HVPE’s RCR was 82%, significantly lower than its end-April 2017 level of 108%, reflecting the level of new commitments scheduled for the current and following two years. This commitment plan has been made with a view to ensuring that HVPE moves closer to a fully invested position over the next two to three years.
HVPE principally invests via funds of funds, making its cash drawdown profile relatively predictable, with primary fund drawdowns typically spread over five to seven years. HVPE has a large invested portfolio that has historically delivered a steady flow of realisations. Potential cash flows under several different macroeconomic scenarios have been analysed, with the conclusion drawn by the board that HVPE’s balance sheet should be able to withstand a downturn worse than the 2008 global financial crisis. While the expected level of borrowing remains very modest under most scenarios, the board has chosen to maintain US$500m of secured and committed bank facilities, believing that they provide an essential foundation for future investment performance by allowing HVPE to run a commitment ratio materially higher than many of its peers.
The HarbourVest funds employ leverage to a limited extent for two main purposes: bridging capital calls and distributions; and financing specific investment projects where the use of debt may be advantageous. HarbourVest could potentially also use debt opportunistically to recapitalise funds, in order to accelerate distributions to investors. The amount borrowed varies according to the type of fund, but the outstanding debt typically represents between 5% and 30% of a fund’s committed capital, with the majority of funds below 20%. On a look-through basis, HVPE’s total embedded leverage was US$238.7m at end-January 2018. The increase in embedded leverage from US$46.8m in December 2015 has been a significant factor underlying the increase in HVPE’s cash balance in recent years.