RXi Pharmaceuticals: A differentiated RNAi approach
RXi has been active over the past year, completing two licensing deals – the in-licensing of dermatology treatment Samcyprone and the out-licensing of its proprietary technology capabilities to MirImmune, while steadily advancing its lead compound RXI-109 in dermatological and ophthalmology indications. The company remains operationally lean, maintaining its strategic focus on opportunistic deal making, while simultaneously advancing its discovery and clinical development programs arising from its novel advanced RNAi-based technology platform.
Exhibit 1: RXi discovery and development pipeline
Treatment |
Indication |
Status |
RXI-109 |
Hypertrophic scars and keloids |
Phase IIa data (study 1402) H116 |
RXI-109 |
Retinal scarring (macular degeneration) |
IND accepted and Phase I (study 1501) planned Q415 |
RXI-109 |
Corneal scarring |
Preclinical |
Samcyprone |
Cutaneous warts |
Phase II initiation Q415 |
Samcyprone |
Alopecia areata, cutaneous metastases of melanoma |
Ongoing Phase II investigator sponsored trials |
Source: Edison Investment Research
What is RNA interference (RNAi)?
RNAi, also known as RNA silencing, is a natural phenomenon by which cells prevent protein production by interfering with gene expression. Craig Mello, PhD, a founder of RXi Pharmaceuticals, shared the 2006 Nobel Prize in Medicine for its discovery. It is thought that the RNAi mechanism evolved as a natural cellular defence against exogenous double stranded RNA from RNA viruses.
The central paradigm is that DNA is transcribed to messenger RNA (mRNA), which is translated into a protein. However cells produce other types of 'non-coding' RNA with different functions and one such class are the small interfering RNAs (siRNAs, 20-30 nucleotides long), which play a key role in mRNA regulation. Together with a protein of the Argonaute family, siRNA forms an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and when the RISC recognizes its target mRNA (based on nucleotide matching of the siRNA), it binds and enzymatically cleaves and destroys the mRNA, thereby inhibiting the unwanted activity instructed by the mRNA, eg cell proliferation. The siRNA is intact and RISC can continue to cleave many copies of the target mRNA.
Through the delivery of synthetic siRNAs, RNAi provides a novel and potentially powerful approach to treat diseases that involve overexpression of specific proteins (eg collagen in scarring or cholesterol in hypercholesterolaemia). It may also be effective in rare genetic diseases that involve a mutation in one allele, with the other allele being normal, so reducing the mutant protein could prevent disease symptoms (eg familial amyloidosis and Huntington's disease). RNAi therapeutics can be designed against any mRNA (even for proteins not considered 'druggable') and have the advantage of blocking production of disease-causing proteins before they are made.
Large pharma companies (including Roche, Novartis and Merck) have historically found the delivery of siRNA and microRNA therapeutics challenging and have largely left the field to smaller biotech companies to develop RNAi-based therapeutics in a broad range of indications, including RXi Pharmaceuticals, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Arrowhead Research, Sirnaomics, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Silence Therapeutics, Sylentis (Zeltia), Quark Pharmaceuticals and Mirna.
RXi’s RNAi Therapeutic Platform: sd-rxRNA
The delivery of RNAi therapeutics to the right organ and cells is key. Developed in house RXi’s 'self-delivering' RNAi platform (sd-rxRNA) contains a variety of nuclease stabilizing and lipophilic chemical modifications, which the company believes has advantages over a conventional liposome-encapsulated approach. The result is RNA-antisense hybrids that combine the beneficial properties of both conventional RNAi and antisense technologies, with the aim of achieving efficient spontaneous cell uptake, potent and long-lasting intracellular activity but lower immune activation. Preclinically RXi has demonstrated efficient cellular uptake of sd-rxRNA both in vitro and in vivo, in tissues such as skin, retina, lung, spinal cord and liver, and target gene silencing in different cell types. Efforts are currently focused on local rather than systemic delivery of its compounds, including to skin, eye, lung and possibly the central nervous system. The sd-rxRNA platform will require further optimisation to overcome the tissue clearance challenges of systemic delivery.
In addition to its own in-house clinical and preclinical work, in October RXi announced encouraging results from its collaboration with Biogazelle, a firm focusing on RNA gene expression. The companies reported that specifically designed sd-rxRNAs showed robust and potent reduction of multiple long non-coding RNAs (IncRNAs) in a target-specific manner, thereby expanding the potential applications of the sd-rxRNA platform in additional diseases and disorders.
RXI-109 in Phase II for dermal scarring
RXi is developing sd-rxRNA compounds for the treatment of scarring in the skin and eye. Its most advanced clinical candidate, RXI-109 silences the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), which plays a key role in pathways involved in fibrosis, including hypertrophic and keloid scar formation in the skin. Hypertrophic scars are abnormally raised scars that are darker than the existing skin and caused by increased cell proliferation and collagen production. Keloid scars are similar but spread beyond the original site of skin injury and may continue to grow in size for years. Both hypertrophic scars and keloids can result from common skin trauma such as acne, ear piercing, cuts and burns or vaccination. Two Phase I trials of RXI-109 in healthy volunteers have demonstrated its safety and showed a dose-dependent silencing of CTGF mRNA and protein. Approximately 100 subjects have been treated with RXI-109 by intradermal injection in all trials to date, with no major side effect or safety issues reported. Three Phase IIa trials are now underway in both hypertrophic and keloid scars:
■
Study 1301 – started November 2013: 22 subjects with hypertrophic scars undergoing scar revision surgery were treated with RXI-109 on one end of the scar and placebo on the opposite end, with three intradermal doses over two weeks. Enrolment is complete and subjects continue to be monitored up to nine months, with study completion expected by end-2015. Initial three-month observations were positive and suggested that initiating treatment two weeks post-surgery, during the proliferation phase of healing, and extending the treatment duration, is more beneficial than initiating treatment in the immediate inflammation phase.
■
Study 1401 – started April 2014: 16 Subjects with two keloids of similar size/location had one treated with RXI-109 (four weekly injections over one month) and the other with placebo following keloidectomy. Enrolment is complete and a review of preliminary data by an expert panel presented in March 2015. The key endpoint of the trial was the comparison of RXI-109 vs placebo treatment to reduce keloid recurrence, as measured by investigator assessment and visual analogue scales. The panel found the placebo-treated site was more often identified as showing faster recurrence of keloids than that of the RXI-109-treated site in this relatively subjective assessment.
■
Study 1402 – started July 2014: a refinement of study 1301 in patients with hypertrophic scars. In October 2015, RXi announced positive results from the initial three-month analysis of this study in 15 patients showing visible beneficial effect on the suppression of hypertrophic scarring with patients using RXI-109 as compared to no treatment. Subjects were assessed using four methods; POSAS (Physician and Observer Scar Assessment Scale); Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and two blind assessments of photographs. Completion date for the study was targeted for mid-2016; however, the company plans additional cohorts for further assessment of the dosing regimen.
By the end of 2015, the company expects final data for Phase IIa Study 1301 and late readouts for Study 1401. In addition to the extension to Study 1402 in severe hypertrophic scars, RXi is also planning a new keloid Phase IIa study with an extended dosing regimen. Results from these studies will inform the design of Phase IIb studies, which we assume will now start in late 2016.
Market potential for dermal scarring is significant
Scars can have long lasting functional, cosmetic as well as psychological consequences for the patient. There are no FDA-approved therapies in the US for the treatment or prevention of scars. At the time of its 2007 deal with Renovo for Juvista (since terminated due to failure in Phase III on lack of efficacy), Shire estimated that the total US scar prevention/treatment market could be worth around $4 billion pa. In the developed world, 100 million patients acquire scars each year, largely as a result of 55 million elective operations and 25 million operations after trauma. The incidence of hypertrophic scarring following surgery varies from 40% in the general population: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Hypertrophic%20scarring%20and%20keloids%3A%20%20pathomechanisms%20and%20current%20emerging%20treatment%20strategieshttp:// to 70% in certain Asian populations, rising to 91% following burn injury. Keloid scars are more common in darker skin, with a prevalence of less than 0.1% in the UK, rising to 16% in people of African origin. They have a strong genetic component. Specifically in the US there were 30.1 million surgical skin procedures in 2010 and according to the 2014 American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) report, out of 5.8m reconstructive procedures, there were 177,000 scar revision surgeries.
As suggested by Shire in 2007, the total addressable market for an FDA-approved dermal scar prevention and treatment could be as high as $4bn pa in the US. In 2014, approximately $13 billion was spent on cosmetic procedures in the US, with a mean cost per procedure of $830 (ASPS). Consumer research shows that 85% of patients would (and already do) self pay for the reduction or prevention of scarring. For example, laser skin resurfacing is commonly used to treat wrinkles, warts, scars and deep lines, with an average course costing $2,300 (ASPS, 2011).
We model peak sales for RXI-109 in dermal scarring of $1.5bn in 2027, before risk adjustments. Our forecasts assume use in 50% of scar revision surgeries, 5% of reconstructive procedures and 5% of breast augmentation procedures. We assume a largely self-paying market.
Exhibit 2: Sales forecast for RX-109 in dermal scarring
Addressable market |
Penetration |
$m potential 2027 |
Scar revision surgery ~170,000 pa |
50% |
350 |
Reconstructive cosmetic surgery and breast augmentation ~5.9m pa |
5% |
1,150 |
Total |
|
1,500 |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Current therapies for scar management: Variable efficacy
Standard management of hypertrophic and keloid scars includes non-invasive approaches (compression, silicone sheeting, over-the-counter creams) and invasive approaches (surgical excision, corticosteroid injection, radiotherapy, laser therapy and cryosurgery) as well as more experimental third-line therapies (intralesional 5-FU, verapamil, bleomycin, mitomycin-C, interferon alpha and topical imiquimod) – see Exhibit 3. Keloid scars are much harder to treat than hypertrophic scars and have a high recurrence rate, which can be a soon as a few weeks. Often a combination of treatments is more effective than monotherapy, for example, surgery plus steroid injection and silicone sheeting, or steroid plus 5FU. Treatment can be expensive, lengthy, and in the case of steroids and experimental drugs, have adverse side effects. Moreover, many current therapies have only been tested in small trials and efficacy data is extremely variable.
Exhibit 3: Current approaches for scar prevention and reduction
|
Details |
Response Rate |
Recurrence rate |
Comments (including adverse effects) |
Prevention of scarring post-surgery |
|
|
|
|
Pressure therapy |
Compression bandages 23h/day for six-12 months |
50-100% |
- |
First-line therapy for hypertrophic burn scars and ear keloids post-excision. Poor compliance due to discomfort and treatment duration. |
Silicone gel sheeting (or silicone gel) |
≥12h / day for ≥ two months |
50-100% |
- |
Widely used despite poor clinical evidence; sheets may hinder movement or be visible, leading to poor patient compliance. Expensive. |
Flavonoids (onion extract) |
Mederma/Contractubex Gel (Merz Pharma): 2x daily for four-six months |
- |
- |
Limited efficacy and variable data. Available OTC - eg Mederma Gel costs $160 for five months. |
Reduction of existing scars |
|
|
|
|
Corticosteroids |
Intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC), several treatments once or twice a month |
50-100% |
9-50% |
First line for keloids, second line for hypertrophic scars in combination with surgery, PDL and cryotherapy. Painful injections. Side effects in 40% of patients are fat atrophy, dermal thinning and telangiectasias. |
Scar revision surgery |
Excision with tension-free closure; skin grafting; |
- |
50-100% |
Efficacious for hypertrophic scars; High recurrence rates of 45-100% for keloids without adjuvant therapy. |
Laser therapy (PDL) |
Short-pulsed dye laser, two-six treatments every two-six weeks |
30-40% |
4% hypertrophic, up to 50% keloids |
More effective for hypertrophic scars than keloids, and in combination with steroid. Expensive, requires specialist. |
Cryotherapy |
Liquid nitrogen |
70% with other therapies |
8-50% |
Limited to smaller scars, common side effects include blistering, pain and depigmentation. |
Radiotherapy |
Superficial X-rays over five-six sessions during early post-operative period. |
56% (76% after surgery) |
14-29% |
Second/third-line approach. Used as adjuvant after keloid excision; adverse effects include immediate skin reaction; low risk of malignancy. |
Source: Gauglitz et al, Molecular Medicine. 2011; 17(1-2): 113, Edison Investment Research
Drugs in development for scarring prevention and reduction
There are relatively few treatments in development for dermal scarring. RXI-109 looks to be the most advanced in development siRNA-based therapy for scarring. Pfizer's PF-06473871(EXC-001) is an antisense oligo which also targets CTGF. It completed five Phase II trials in 2012-2014, but its development now appears to have been discontinued.
Exhibit 4: Select RNAi drugs in development for scar prevention
Product |
Company |
Approach (target) |
Delivery |
Status |
EXC-001 (PF-06473871) |
ISIS/Excaliard (now PFE) |
Antisense oligo (anti-CTGF) |
Injected |
Five Phase II completed; discontinued in 2015 |
RXI-109 |
RXi Pharmaceuticals |
siRNA (anti-CTGF) |
Self-delivering siRNAi, intradermal injection |
Three Phase II ongoing |
ACT1 (Granexin Gel) |
FirstString Research |
Synthetic peptide (connexin analogue) |
Topical |
Phase II complete 2013; Phase III being planned |
GBT009 |
Garnet BioTherapeutics |
Cell therapy, purified from adult bone marrow |
IV injection |
Phase II in five patients ongoing |
SCX-001 (Nefopam) |
ScarX Therapeutics |
Small molecule (catenin inhibitor) |
Topical |
Phase I/IIa planned |
Source: Edison Investment Research
In February 2015, augmenting its portfolio of treatments in therapeutic dermatology, RXi licensed in global rights for the topical gel, Samcyprone from Hapten Pharmaceuticals for an upfront payment of $100,000 and 200,000 shares of RXi common stock. Hapten will also be eligible for milestones and escalating mid-single digit royalty payments based on commercial objectives and product sales. RXi is currently conducting a Phase II program for Samcyprone in viral warts, while we understand that trials are ongoing by independent investigators in alopecia areata (baldness) and in cutaneous metastases of malignant melanoma, where Samcyprone recently received orphan drug status. Other potential indications for Samcyprone include actinic keratosis, basal-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma and cutaneous metastasis of non-melanoma cancers. Samcyprone is a proprietary gel-like formulation of the topical DPCP (immunomodulator diphenylcyclopropenone), with a potential improved safety profile through its lower concentrated dosing and more consistent easier delivery. DPCP is not FDA approved and must be formulated in acetone by a pharmacist, based on directions from an individual dermatologist and therefore there is no standardized usage. It works through the initiation of a T-cell response by altering the expression of multiple genes and miRNAs in the immune response. A small molecule, DPCP has been used by dermatology centers for more than 30 years, primarily as a stimulant for the regrowth of hair in patients with alopecia areata. In one retrospective study with 54 patients with alopecia areata (alopecia areata is an autoimmune disease in which hair loss occurs in some or all areas of the body), terminal hair growth was labelled ‘excellent’ at 76%-100% in 40.7% of patients, ‘good’ at 51%-75% in 14.8%, ‘moderate’ at 26%-50% in 14.8% of patients and mild (<25%) in 29.6% of patients. Recent data published in peer reviewed journals also show DPCP efficacy in certain skin diseases, ie alopecia areata, warts and cutaneous metastases of malignant melanoma. There is currently one patent and three outstanding patent applications for Samcyprone covering the compositions and methods of use in warts, HPV, skin infections, skin cancer and immunocompromised patients, expiring between 2019 and 2031.
According to RXi, the total addressable market in the three indications for which DPCP is currently being used (warts, melanoma and alopecia areata) is approximately $1bn, with warts the greatest potential market at an estimated $500m. Warts are benign tumours caused by infection with human papilloma viruses and can be mucosal or cutaneous. Cutaneous warts are common, particularly among the young. Various studies have shown that up to 33% of children and young people have cutaneous warts and 3%-5% in adults. In children and teenagers warts disappear within a year, but while there is little research, are typically of longer duration in adults with recovery affected by immune system strength. This spontaneous resolution can take years, and in the interim warts can grow and spread causing pain and distress due to appearance. A number of treatments have been used for cutaneous warts, but evidence of efficacy remains poor. Imiquimod is the most commonly-used medication for cutaneous warts, despite its lack of approval in this indication (it is currently indicated for basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis and genital warts in adults) and prior to becoming generic in 2011 achieved sales of $350m in 2010. There are no controlled trials for imiquimod in cutaneous warts, but there is some evidence of efficacy in various case studies.
RXi is finalizing its protocol for a Phase II trial in warts, targeted for initiation by year-end. Primary endpoint of the study is clearance of Samcyprone-treated warts versus untreated warts over a 12-week treatment period. The company expects this first study to be relatively easy to recruit, enabling a safety database to support investigator sponsored trials in added indications. Our model includes peak sales for Samcyprone of $177m in 2027 in hard to treat warts only at 50% penetration.
Exhibit 6: Treatments for cutaneous warts
Mechanism |
Examples |
Ablative therapies* |
Salicylic, lactic and other acids; cantharadin; silver nitrate; cryotherapy; laser therapy and photodynamic therapy; hyfrecation; curettage |
Antimitotic and antiviral therapy |
5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, topical cidofovir, podophyllin/podophyllotoxin |
Stimulate host immune responses against the virus |
Imiquimod, oral cimetidine; topical and oral zinc; intralesional candida, mumps, or Trichophyton antigen; intralesional interferon; contact sensitizers such as diphenylcyclopropenone |
Other |
Ingenol mebutate (Picato), Duct tape*, retinoids |
Mechanism |
Ablative therapies* |
Antimitotic and antiviral therapy |
Stimulate host immune responses against the virus |
Other |
Examples |
Salicylic, lactic and other acids; cantharadin; silver nitrate; cryotherapy; laser therapy and photodynamic therapy; hyfrecation; curettage |
5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, topical cidofovir, podophyllin/podophyllotoxin |
Imiquimod, oral cimetidine; topical and oral zinc; intralesional candida, mumps, or Trichophyton antigen; intralesional interferon; contact sensitizers such as diphenylcyclopropenone |
Ingenol mebutate (Picato), Duct tape*, retinoids |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *It is proposed that ablative therapies and those such as duct tape might expose the immune system to HPV antigen, causing a host immune reaction.
Given DCPC’s ability to alter the expression of miRNAs in immune responses, RXi anticipates studies with Samcyprone could enable the discovery of drug targets to treat skin and systemic-related immune disorders, resulting in the development of more potent/selective compounds.