Pan African announced its FY22 financial results within the context of known production results, which were released to the market on 14 July. Overall, production in H222 was 1,646oz (1.7%) higher than our prior expectations to result in production for the year that was 2.5% (or 5,668oz) in excess of the company’s formal guidance of 200,000oz:
Exhibit 1: Pan African production, H118–H222 (oz)
Operation |
H119 |
H219 |
H120 |
H220 |
H121 |
H221 |
H122 |
H222e |
H222a |
*Variance (%) |
FY22a |
FY22e |
Barberton UG |
38,550 |
36,806 |
36,737 |
31,392 |
42,350 |
42,476 |
39,991 |
37,009 |
35,747 |
-3.4 |
75,738 |
77,000 |
BTRP |
12,006 |
12,001 |
10,619 |
9,516 |
10,004 |
8,235 |
9,126 |
10,874 |
10,434 |
-4.0 |
19,560 |
20,000 |
Barberton |
50,556 |
48,807 |
47,356 |
40,908 |
52,354 |
50,711 |
49,117 |
47,883 |
46,181 |
-3.6 |
95,298 |
97,000 |
Evander UG |
8,821 |
8,058 |
11,553 |
9,117 |
12,607 |
23,409 |
27,312 |
18,230 |
21,538 |
+18.1 |
48,850 |
45,542 |
Evander surface |
6,345 |
3,654 |
4,731 |
6,176 |
6,560 |
4,677 |
5,756 |
4,244 |
3,564 |
-16.0 |
9,320 |
10,000 |
Evander |
15,166 |
11,712 |
16,284 |
15,293 |
19,169 |
28,086 |
33,068 |
22,474 |
25,102 |
+11.7 |
58,170 |
55,542 |
Elikhulu |
15,292 |
30,909 |
29,301 |
30,315 |
26,863 |
24,596 |
25,900 |
25,600 |
26,320 |
+2.8 |
52,220 |
51,500 |
Total |
81,014 |
91,428 |
92,941 |
86,516 |
98,386 |
103,391 |
108,085 |
95,957 |
97,603 |
+1.7 |
205,688 |
204,042 |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Pan African Resources. Note: *H222a versus H222e. Totals may not add up owing to rounding. UG = underground. BTRP = Barberton Tailings Retreatment Project.
As in H122, Pan African’s outperformance in H222 could once again be largely attributed to operations at Evander underground, which reported its third largest (implied) adjusted EBITDA in a six-month period under Pan African stewardship, continuing its post-H220 renaissance and cementing its position once again as a major contributor to Pan African’s profitability:
Exhibit 2: Pan African adjusted EBITDA, by business unit, H115–H222
|
|
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research
|
Readers should note that on this measure of adjusted EBITDA, Pan African’s performance in H222 was its third best on record, after H122 and H121, and only fractionally (3.8% or ZAR47.8m) below its record level of ZAR1,264.8m, which it achieved in H122.
H222 and FY22 financial results
PAF’s normalised HEPS in FY22 were 14.6% below our prior expectations, exclusively as a result of costs in H2 that stuck at higher levels than we had previously anticipated which, in this case, were left unrelieved by only a very modest depreciation of the value of the rand versus the US dollar (and appreciation against sterling):
Exhibit 3: ZAR versus US$ (H113–H222)
|
|
Source: Pan African Resources, Bloomberg.
|
Otherwise, revenue was slightly above and depreciation slightly below our forecasts – the latter as a consequence of the extension of Evander’s underground mine life as a result of the sanctioning of the 25 & 26 Level project (given that Pan African depreciates on a ‘units of production’ basis). While declining, ‘other expenses’ relating to business development expenditure also reduced further and faster than we had expected and are now expected to remain at lower levels into the foreseeable future.
Exhibit 4: Pan African P&L statement by half-year (FY19–H222)
US$000s*
|
H120 |
H220 |
H121 |
H221 |
H122 |
H222e |
H222a |
FY22 |
FY22e |
**Variance (%) |
Revenue |
132,849 |
141,258 |
183,751 |
185,164 |
193,574 |
180,657 |
182,797 |
376,371 |
371,949 |
1.2 |
Cost of production |
(86,501) |
(71,956) |
(98,245) |
(110,570) |
(108,368) |
(92,477) |
(118,077) |
(226,445) |
(198,078) |
14.3 |
Depreciation |
(10,526) |
(10,977) |
(12,741) |
(19,333) |
(13,268) |
(17,634) |
(13,160) |
(26,428) |
(30,902) |
-14.5 |
Mining profit |
35,821 |
58,325 |
72,766 |
55,260 |
71,938 |
70,545 |
51,560 |
123,498 |
142,969 |
-13.6 |
Other income/(expenses) |
(962) |
(27,720) |
(6,704) |
(6,115) |
(7,711) |
(4,200) |
(2,117) |
(9,828) |
(11,911) |
-17.5 |
Loss in associate etc |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Loss on disposals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
N/A |
Impairments |
109 |
(20) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
(467) |
(467) |
0 |
N/A |
Royalty costs |
(208) |
(266) |
(2,404) |
(1,050) |
(1,316) |
(4,874) |
(780) |
(2,096) |
(6,268) |
-66.6 |
Net income before finance |
34,761 |
30,319 |
63,657 |
48,096 |
62,910 |
61,471 |
48,197 |
111,107 |
124,790 |
-11.0 |
Finances income |
207 |
258 |
300 |
456 |
661 |
|
434 |
1,095 |
|
N/A |
Finance costs |
(7,760) |
(5,587) |
(3,946) |
(3,729) |
(1,945) |
|
(3,381) |
(5,326) |
|
N/A |
Net finance income |
(7,553) |
(5,329) |
(3,646) |
(3,273) |
(1,285) |
(1,060) |
(2,946) |
(4,231) |
(2,344) |
80.5 |
Profit before taxation |
27,208 |
24,990 |
60,011 |
44,823 |
61,626 |
60,411 |
45,250 |
106,876 |
122,445 |
-12.7 |
Taxation |
(5,303) |
(2,602) |
(19,239) |
(10,903) |
(15,573) |
(18,416) |
(16,351) |
(31,924) |
(34,152) |
-6.5 |
Effective tax rate (%) |
19.5 |
10.4 |
32.1 |
24.3 |
25.3 |
30.5 |
36.1 |
29.9 |
27.9 |
7.2 |
PAT (continuing ops) |
21,906 |
22,388 |
40,773 |
33,920 |
46,053 |
41,995 |
28,899 |
74,952 |
88,293 |
-15.1 |
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
(185) |
(185) |
- |
N/A |
Ditto (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
(0.6) |
0.0 |
- |
N/A |
Attributable profit |
|
|
|
|
|
41,995 |
29,084 |
75,137 |
88,293 |
-14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headline earnings |
21,742 |
22,416 |
40,772 |
33,919 |
46,053 |
41,995 |
29,551 |
75,604 |
88,293 |
-14.4 |
Est. normalised headline earnings |
22,704 |
50,136 |
47,476 |
40,034 |
53,764.1 |
46,195 |
31,668 |
85,432 |
100,204 |
-14.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS (c) |
1.14 |
1.16 |
2.11 |
1.76 |
2.39 |
2.18 |
1.51 |
3.90 |
4.59 |
-15.0 |
HEPS*** (c) |
1.13 |
1.16 |
2.11 |
1.76 |
2.39 |
2.40 |
1.54 |
3.93 |
4.59 |
-14.4 |
Normalised HEPS (c) |
1.18 |
2.60 |
2.46 |
2.08 |
2.79 |
2.40 |
1.65 |
4.44 |
5.20 |
-14.6 |
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research. As reported basis. Note: *Unless otherwise indicated; **FY22a cf FY22e; ***HEPS = headline earnings per share (company adjusted basis).
Once again, deferred taxes accounted for the majority (79%) of the total tax charge for the year, with cash taxes paid amounting to only 21% of the total tax charge.
FY22 and H222 operational analysis
Barberton underground (37% of production; 33% of adjusted EBITDA)
Full details of Barberton’s performance in FY22 and H222 are available in Pan African’s results announcement. In summary however, Barberton’s Fairview underground operation performed solidly during the second half of the year, mainly as a result of accelerated underground development programmes and a focus on optimising ore extraction and increased mining flexibility at the high grade MRC and Rossiter orebodies, where five large platforms (denoted 256, 257, 258, 259 and 358) are currently available for mining on the former and three on the latter. Nevertheless, in May, it still achieved two million fatality free shifts. Of particular note at Barberton during the second six-month period of the financial year was the close control of costs, with unit working costs declining by 3.9% in rand terms, to ZAR4,555.38/t in H222 cf H122, against a background of otherwise generally rising prices. As a result, adjusted EBITDA at Barberton increased by 16.3% in H222 relative to H121 and was the third highest on record, after H121 and H221 (see Exhibit 2).
A key focus for the year ahead will be the smaller underground operations at Barberton Mines to ensure that these high-grade assets perform to their full potential. In the meantime, management has initiated an exploration programme to define additional gold resources for mining at the Sheba and Consort mines. In the table below we summarise Barberton’s performance in H222 relative to our prior expectations and provide our forecasts for FY23.
Exhibit 5: Barberton underground operational statistics and estimates, H120–FY23e
|
H220 |
H121 |
H221 |
H122 |
H222e |
H222a |
**Variance (%) |
FY23e (prior) |
FY23e |
Tonnes milled underground (t) |
116,035 |
122,199 |
133,473 |
125,257 |
126,228 |
126,804 |
0.5 |
|
|
Head grade underground (g/t) |
*8.79 |
11.25 |
*10.42 |
*10.46 |
9.62 |
*9.20 |
-4.4 |
|
|
Underground gold contained (oz) |
32,791 |
44,195 |
44,724 |
42,125 |
39,057 |
37,515 |
-3.9 |
|
|
Tonnes milled surface (t) |
56,593 |
39,267 |
30,078 |
27,740 |
30,379 |
42,237 |
39.0 |
|
|
Head grade surface (g/t) |
*0.73 |
1.06 |
*0.98 |
*0.98 |
0.98 |
*0.68 |
-30.6 |
|
|
Surface gold contained (oz) |
1,331 |
1,343 |
949 |
876 |
957 |
923 |
-3.6 |
|
|
Tons milled (t) |
172,628 |
161,466 |
163,551 |
152,997 |
156,607 |
169,041 |
7.9 |
310,211 |
310,211 |
Head grade (g/t) |
6.15 |
8.77 |
8.69 |
8.74 |
7.95 |
7.07 |
-11.1 |
9.49 |
8.24 |
Contained gold (oz) |
34,122 |
45,538 |
45,673 |
43,001 |
40,014 |
38,438 |
-3.9 |
94,605 |
82,171 |
Recovery (%) |
92.0 |
93.0 |
93.0 |
93.0 |
92.5 |
93.0 |
0.5 |
92.5 |
92.5 |
Production underground (oz) |
31,392 |
42,350 |
42,476 |
39,991 |
37,009 |
35,747 |
-3.4 |
87,500 |
76,000 |
Production calcine dumps/surface ops (oz) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
N/A |
0 |
0 |
Total production (oz) |
31,392 |
42,350 |
42,476 |
39,991 |
37,009 |
35,747 |
-3.4 |
87,500 |
76,000 |
Recovered grade (g/t) |
5.66 |
8.16 |
8.08 |
8.13 |
7.35 |
6.58 |
-10.5 |
8.77 |
7.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold sold (oz) |
31,392 |
42,350 |
42,476 |
39,308 |
37,009 |
36,430 |
-1.6 |
87,500 |
76,000 |
Average spot price (US$/oz) |
1,647 |
1,877 |
1,805 |
1,792 |
1,876 |
1,876 |
0.0 |
1,784 |
1,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average spot price (ZAR/kg) |
882,504 |
981,381 |
843,828 |
866,671 |
928,970 |
928,970 |
0.0 |
943,691 |
964,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash cost (US$/oz) |
1,053 |
997 |
1,150 |
1,227 |
1,247 |
1,372 |
10.0 |
920 |
1,105 |
Total cash cost (ZAR/kg) |
572,432 |
521,351 |
542,629 |
593,380 |
617,368 |
679,598 |
10.1 |
486,668 |
613,586 |
Total cash cost (US$/t) |
191.44 |
261.64 |
298.72 |
315.34 |
294.63 |
295.71 |
0.4 |
259.50 |
270.62 |
Total cash cost (ZAR/t) |
3,237.70 |
4,253.00 |
4,383.29 |
4,742.00 |
4,537.80 |
4,555.38 |
0.4 |
4,269.63 |
4,675.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied revenue (US$000) |
53,724 |
79,491 |
76,250 |
70,440 |
69,429 |
68,236 |
-1.7 |
156,098 |
131,982 |
Implied revenue (ZAR000) |
893,997 |
1,292,694 |
1,105,899 |
1,059,597 |
1,069,337 |
1,050,996 |
-1.7 |
2,568,293 |
2,280,255 |
Implied revenue (£000) |
42,614 |
60,824 |
54,762 |
51,680 |
53,477 |
52,509 |
-1.8 |
129,930 |
112,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied cash costs (US$000) |
33,047 |
42,246 |
48,857 |
48,246 |
46,141 |
49,987 |
8.3 |
80,501 |
83,950 |
Implied cash costs (ZAR000) |
558,918 |
686,715 |
716,891 |
725,512 |
710,651 |
770,046 |
8.4 |
1,324,486 |
1,450,427 |
Implied cash costs (£000) |
26,203 |
32,349 |
35,265 |
35,413 |
35,563 |
38,390 |
7.9 |
67,017 |
71,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported adjusted EBITDA (ZAR000) |
262,200 |
543,900 |
421,700 |
341,000 |
|
396,600 |
N/A |
|
|
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Estimated. **H222a cf H222e.
H222 relative to H122 aggregate cash costs increased by 3.6%, while tonnes milled increased by 10.5% (leading to the decline in costs per tonne noted). Year-on-year, tonnes milled were almost identical in FY22 to FY21 (a change of just -0.9%), while costs increased by 7.8%, or US$7.1m. Nevertheless, this increase should be interpreted within the context of an increase of 8.4% in the group’s overall cost of production from US$208.8m to US$226.4m in FY22. Within this:
■
Mining and processing costs (representing 42.5% of the total cost of production) increased by US$0.9m at Barberton owing to increased vamping costs and additional support installed in working areas at the Sheba and Consort mines, as well as the additional operating costs associated with a cemented backfill grout plant, which was commissioned at Consort in FY22 in order to assist in supporting poor ground conditions associated with a highly altered, but high-grade, schistose orebody.
■
Salaries and wages (representing 25.1% of the total cost of production) increased by more than the group average of 5.8% at Barberton as a result of a combination of the group’s average annual salary increase of c 5.0% plus an increase in employee headcount of 2.4%.
■
Electricity costs (representing 14.9% of the cost of production) were increased by a statutory 13% by South Africa’s electricity regulator, NERSA.
■
Engineering and technical costs (representing 9.5% of the cost of production) increased by US$2.9m at Barberton and accounted for substantially all of the group-wide increase in these costs of US$3.3m.
Barberton Mines is maintaining its exploration focus on the down-dip extensions of its existing orebodies in FY23. In FY22, Barberton Mines conducted underground diamond core drilling programmes in excess of 9,000m and exploration metres drilled will remain at these levels in the foreseeable future. Specific focus is being placed on near-mine in-fill drilling, as well as down-dip reserve delineation drilling of underground mineral resources. Drilling into the down-dip extensions of the orebodies was reported to have yielded excellent results and improved the geological understanding of operations at Barberton as well as demonstrating their extent and quality, while continued drilling has also provided the opportunity for the grade control modelling protocols of the various operations to be upgraded to allow for improved mine design and orebody extraction in conjunction with the roll-out of more advanced and interconnected mining-related software packages to further optimise production. In the meantime, broader-scale exploration drilling is focused on the Hope, Main Muiden and Golden Quarry reefs, with desktop studies being conducted on various known but unmined lower-grade blocks in all orebodies.
Elikhulu (27% of production; 43% of adjusted EBITDA)
Production at Elikhulu was characterised by near-record throughput in H222, which recovered from preternaturally high levels of rainfall at the end of H122 and which offset higher than expected concentrations of historically processed fine carbon in the lower benches of the Kinross tailings storage facility (TSF) that continued to adversely affect metallurgical recoveries, compounded by the mining of the coarser but high-grade outer wall of the Kinross TSF.
As a result, Elikhulu’s share of group adjusted EBITDA reverted to over 40% in H222 and easily covered capex of ZAR139.6m, despite the latter increasing sharply (as expected) to effect the switchover of operations from the Kinross to the Leslie and Bracken tailings storage facilities (Phase 2). Notwithstanding its increase, capex at Elikhulu remained a fraction of that at Pan African’s underground operations and, despite peaking at c ZAR405m in FY23, will still only approximate sustaining capex at Barberton. With the completion of the TSF extension and the Leslie/Bracken pump station at Elikhulu during FY23, capital expenditure will once again revert to previous (negligible) levels of sustaining capital thereafter (until the transition to the Winkelhaak TSF in 2026).
A full analysis of Elikhulu’s performance in H222 relative to both previous half-year periods and our prior expectations is provided in the table below, including our expectations for FY23:
Exhibit 6: Elikhulu operational statistics and estimates, H219–H222e
|
H120 |
H220 |
H121 |
H221 |
H122 |
H222e |
H222a |
**Variance (%) |
FY23e (prior) |
FY23e |
Tonnes processed tailings (t) |
6,211,028 |
6,882,546 |
6,278,191 |
6,776,576 |
6,442,397 |
6,702,545 |
7,289,750 |
8.8 |
14,400,000 |
14,400,000 |
Head grade tailings (g/t) |
*0.28 |
0.32 |
0.31 |
0.29 |
0.34 |
0.25 |
0.34 |
36.0 |
0.31 |
0.30 |
Tailings gold contained (oz) |
56,348 |
70,494 |
62,472 |
63,038 |
70,000 |
53,590 |
79,200 |
47.8 |
144,965 |
139,474 |
Recovery (%) |
52.0 |
43.0 |
43.0 |
39.0 |
37.0 |
47.8 |
33.2 |
-30.5 |
47.8 |
38.0 |
Production tailings (oz) |
29,301 |
30,315 |
26,863 |
24,596 |
25,900 |
25,600 |
26,320 |
2.8 |
69,250 |
53,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production (oz) |
29,301 |
30,315 |
26,863 |
24,596 |
25,900 |
25,600 |
26,320 |
2.8 |
69,250 |
53,000 |
Recovered grade (g/t) |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
-8.3 |
0.15 |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold sold (oz) |
29,301 |
30,315 |
26,863 |
24,596 |
25,900 |
25,600 |
26,320 |
2.8 |
69,250 |
53,000 |
Average spot price (US$/oz) |
1,451 |
1,647 |
1,852 |
1,805 |
1,813 |
1,876 |
1,876 |
0.0 |
1,784 |
1,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average spot price (ZAR/kg) |
685,680 |
882,504 |
968,130 |
843,828 |
876,640 |
928,970 |
928,970 |
0.0 |
944,865 |
965,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash cost (US$/oz) |
621 |
495 |
656 |
849 |
806 |
748 |
938 |
25.4 |
556 |
820 |
Total cash cost (ZAR/kg) |
293,608 |
265,166 |
342,917 |
396,698 |
389,660 |
370,380 |
464,514 |
25.4 |
294,115 |
455,637 |
Total cash cost (US$/t) |
2.93 |
2.15 |
2.81 |
3.05 |
3.24 |
2.86 |
3.39 |
18.5 |
2.67 |
3.02 |
Total cash cost (ZAR/t) |
43.00 |
36.33 |
45.63 |
44.78 |
48.72 |
44.00 |
52.16 |
18.5 |
43.99 |
52.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied revenue (US$000) |
42,516 |
50,783 |
49,750 |
43,442 |
46,957 |
48,026 |
47,875 |
-0.3 |
123,540 |
92,040 |
Implied revenue (ZAR000) |
624,898 |
837,196 |
808,898 |
626,289 |
706,198 |
739,685 |
736,997 |
-0.4 |
2,032,614 |
1,590,173 |
Implied revenue (£000) |
33,740 |
40,283 |
38,067 |
31,097 |
34,451 |
36,991 |
36,797 |
-0.5 |
102,830 |
78,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied cash costs (US$000) |
18,209 |
14,818 |
17,626 |
20,657 |
20,874 |
19,148 |
24,689 |
28.9 |
38,503 |
43,474 |
Implied cash costs (ZAR000) |
267,600 |
250,023 |
286,500 |
303,480 |
313,900 |
294,912 |
380,268 |
28.9 |
633,494 |
751,104 |
Implied cash costs (£000) |
14,455 |
11,784 |
13,496 |
14,986 |
15,322 |
14,758 |
18,978 |
28.6 |
32,054 |
37,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (ZAR000) |
333,100 |
564,000 |
484,800 |
301,200 |
367,000 |
|
523,900 |
|
|
|
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Estimate.
A new re-mining pump station and related infrastructure has been in place for mining to commence at Leslie/Bracken since September 2022, in consequence of which we have revised our immediate production outlook at Elikhulu to reflect the company’s production profile in its full-year results presentation, as shown below:
Exhibit 7: Elikhulu planned life of mine production profile (oz)
|
|
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research
|
In addition, where before we had assumed that unit costs would revert to c ZAR40/t processed, we now assume that they will remain at a permanently higher level of c ZAR52/t in real terms to reflect inflationary pressure in the industry apparent in H222. At Elikhulu specifically in FY22, these included:
■
An increase in processing costs of US$3.2m, owing to above-inflation increases in reagent costs and additional costs associated with the treatment of buttressing material.
■
A US$1.1m increase in engineering & technical costs.
Excluding these cost increases, we estimate that unit working costs would have been ZAR45.73/t or 10.3% less than the actual ZAR51/t recorded in FY22.
Evander underground (22% of production; 16% of adjusted EBITDA)
Underground operations at Evander in FY22 recorded a vastly improved performance relative to earlier periods – largely on account of an elevated head grade and albeit slightly tempered by unit cash costs that remained at higher levels and declined to reduce in line with our prior expectations. Although production did decline in H222 cf H122 therefore, it declined by less than our expectations. Similarly, adjusted EBITDA declined in H222 cf H122, but still recorded its third highest level for a six-month period since Evander was acquired by Pan African in February 2013. Nevertheless, Evander Mines’ underground operations achieved a reportable injury free rate of zero during the period (cf 1.32 per million man hours in FY21), despite the increased number of crews deployed underground
Exhibit 8: Evander operational statistics and estimates, H219–H222e
|
H120 |
H220 |
H121 |
H221 |
H122 |
H222e |
H222a |
*Variance (%) |
FY23e (prior) |
FY23e |
Tonnes milled (t) |
30,044 |
21,392 |
50,634 |
69,812 |
69,790 |
70,000 |
59,297 |
-15.3 |
140,000 |
140,000 |
Head grade (g/t) |
12.59 |
5.16 |
8.51 |
10.56 |
12.55 |
8.27 |
11.35 |
37.2 |
9.95 |
9.95 |
Contained gold (oz) |
12,161 |
3,549 |
13,854 |
23,709 |
28,157 |
18,602 |
21,647 |
16.4 |
44,796 |
44,796 |
Recovery (%) |
95 |
94 |
91 |
99 |
97 |
98 |
99 |
1.0 |
98.0 |
98.0 |
Underground production (oz) |
11,553 |
9,117 |
12,607 |
23,409 |
27,312 |
18,230 |
21,538 |
18.1 |
43,900 |
43,900 |
Production from surface sources (oz) |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
Total production (oz) |
11,553 |
9,117 |
12,607 |
23,409 |
27,312 |
18,230 |
21,538 |
18.1 |
43,900 |
43,900 |
Recovered grade (g/t) |
11.96 |
13.26 |
7.74 |
10.43 |
12.17 |
8.10 |
11.30 |
39.5 |
9.75 |
9.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold sold (oz) |
9,214 |
5,863 |
12,607 |
23,409 |
27,312 |
18,230 |
21,538 |
18.1 |
43,900 |
43,900 |
Average spot price (US$/oz) |
1,451 |
1,647 |
1,852 |
1,805 |
1,813 |
1,876 |
1,876 |
0.0 |
1,784 |
1,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average spot price (ZAR/kg) |
685,658 |
882,504 |
968,072 |
843,828 |
876,639 |
928,970 |
928,970 |
0.0 |
943,691 |
964,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash cost (US$/oz) |
1,420 |
1,241 |
1,604 |
1,030 |
915 |
873 |
1,184 |
35.6 |
786 |
1,223 |
Total cash cost (ZAR/kg) |
671,299 |
665,209 |
838,665 |
481,582 |
442,226 |
432,397 |
586,318 |
35.6 |
415,879 |
679,156 |
Total cash cost (US$/t) |
546.00 |
169.14 |
399.31 |
342.36 |
357.95 |
227.40 |
429.71 |
89.0 |
246.53 |
383.39 |
Total cash cost (ZAR/t) |
6,404 |
5,671 |
6,496 |
5,023 |
5,383 |
3,502 |
6,624 |
89.1 |
4,056 |
6,623.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied revenue (US$000) |
13,370 |
9,879 |
23,348 |
41,877 |
49,517 |
34,199 |
39,244 |
14.8 |
78,316 |
76,236 |
Implied revenue (ZAR000) |
196,499 |
167,699 |
379,599 |
624,798 |
744,697 |
526,725 |
606,299 |
15.1 |
1,288,545 |
1,317,143 |
Implied revenue (£000) |
10,610 |
7,836 |
17,865 |
30,543 |
36,329 |
26,341 |
30,358 |
15.2 |
65,188 |
64,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied cash costs (US$000) |
16,404 |
3,618 |
20,218 |
23,901 |
24,981 |
15,918 |
25,481 |
60.1 |
34,514 |
53,674 |
Implied cash costs (ZAR000) |
192,402 |
121,306 |
328,918 |
350,638 |
375,680 |
245,169 |
392,775 |
60.2 |
567,855 |
927,341 |
Implied cash costs (£000) |
10,393 |
5,509 |
15,495 |
17,312 |
18,337 |
12,269 |
19,633 |
60.0 |
28,733 |
45,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (ZAR000) |
64,900 |
(345,600) |
49,000 |
331,000 |
408,500 |
|
196,400 |
|
|
|
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research. Note: *H222 cf H222e.
The increase in unit working costs at Evander could be attributed to:
■
Mining and processing costs increasing by US$3.8m in FY22 as a direct result of a 7.2% increase in tonnes milled from the mines’ underground operations and an increase in the mining contractor’s headcount of 33.7%, from 1,071 to 1,432 employees, coupled with an annual salary increase of approximately 5.0%.
■
A 6.6% increase in the employee headcount and production bonuses paid for increased production.
■
Electricity costs increasing by US$2.7m, or 8.3%, to US$33.8m due to a 13% regulatory increase (albeit offset by the capitalisation of electricity costs associated with 24 Level development).
Management implemented a number of energy efficiency and management initiatives at Evander during the year, including high efficiency motors & compressors and pumps, geysers and motors replaced with power-saving models. Similarly, the recycling of underground water continues to reduce the amount of energy consumed.
As per its mine plan, the 8 Shaft pillar now has a remaining life of approximately one year, during which it is expected to produce c 44,000oz gold. Mining at 24 Level will then extend 8 Shaft’s production profile, post cessation of the 8 Shaft pillar mining, for an additional two and a half years from FY23, as the current pillar mining reaches completion, after which the board has also now approved the development capital for Evander’s 25 & 26 Level project, which is expected to increase the 8 Shaft’s mine life to 13 years at an expected annual production rate of approximately c 65,000oz.
For the moment, the 24 Level project remains in its construction phase, with all development and infrastructure placement for mining to progress according to plan. The construction of Phase 1 of the underground refrigeration plant on 24 Level is complete and has been commissioned and will be expanded to provide cooling on 24 Level for steady-state production (Phase 2) in Q423. Phase 1 will allow mining of both the 24 Level F raise line stopes and 24 Level B, C and D raise lines. Phase 2 will allow for additional mining crews to be placed on 24 Level as well as mining on 25 Level in subsequent years. Thereafter, the board has approved the continued mining of the down-dip extent of this orebody on 25 and 26 Levels, using the 24 Level infrastructure. Development leading from the existing 24 Level footwall infrastructure will allow access to both 25 and 26 Levels, with an on-reef decline layout. The mining of 25 and 26 Levels will thereby extend Evander Mines’ 8 Shaft production, post extraction of the 8 Shaft pillar and 24 Level, at an annual production rate of approximately 65,000oz pa. Access development on 25 and 26 Levels is reported to be on schedule. Dewatering on 25 Level is in progress and blasting of development ends will commence in FY23, with mining of the first stope planned for FY25. As with Elikhulu, we have updated our mine plan for the 25 & 26 Level project – particularly in the earlier years – to reflect that anticipated by management in its results presentation, as follows:
Exhibit 9: 25 & 26 Level planned life of mine production profile (oz)
|
|
Source: Pan African Resources, Edison Investment Research
|
In the meantime, preliminary work has commenced on the Egoli project, where dewatering of the Number 3 Decline started in June 2022. This decline is anticipated to be dewatered to below 19 Level in Q323, after which reserve delineation drilling will commence to accurately define the Egoli pay-shoot for early mining.
Capex for the 24 and 25 & 26 Level projects at 8 Shaft and equipping costs for Evander Mines’ 7 Shaft infrastructure is estimated at US$50.6m, including steel work and development costs, which will be funded from existing cash flows.