As part of its more international outlook following the Clyde purchase and in advance of moving to the Nasdaq First North Premium market segment in Stockholm, ÅAC has adopted IFRS accounting standards for its reports from FY18.
The major element of change under IFRS is that goodwill is no longer amortised and is reduced by purchase price allocation (PPA) intangibles acquired with Clyde, including customer relations, trademarks, software and backlogs. These assets are amortised over their expected useful lives and tested annually, but have no impact on future cash flow. We therefore exclude the amortisation from our adjusted figures and treat it as exceptional alongside impairments of other fixed and intangible assets.
Internally generated intangibles such as capitalised R&D continues to be amortised separately and taken as a charge to profits, with own work capitalised added to group income.
As can be seen, FY18 was one of transformation for ÅAC Microtec following the effective merger with Clyde Space. As it transpired the guidance given early in the year for revenues in excess of SEK85m for FY18 and a positive Q418 EBITDA were both readily achieved.
The highlights of the trading performance in 2018, the first to be reported under IFRS, include the following:
■
Net sales of SEK77.9m (FY17: SEK13.5m), including a SEK47.1m contribution from the 11 months of consolidation of Clyde Space, acquired in January 2018. ÅAC Microtec sales more than doubled to SEK30.7m (FY17: SEK13.3m), including SEK6.5m of licensing income.
■
Group revenues, which includes other operating income (primarily R&D tax credit and FX), expanded to SEK87.7m (FY17: SEK13.5m), compared to guidance of SEK85m. Clyde contributed revenues of SEK55.9m. Had it been consolidated for the full year, group revenues would have been some SEK4.3m higher at SEK92.0m.
■
An EBITDA loss of SEK28.5m (FY17 loss: SEK21.4m), including a positive EBIDTA contribution of SEK3.5m in Q418. SEK8.8m of acquisition costs was also included in FY18 operating costs. Excluding these the FY18 EIBITDA loss would have been SEK19.7m, a modest improvement.
■
Loss after tax of SEK42.7m (FY17 net loss: SEK27.3m), of which the net loss of Clyde Space was SEK14.9m. The Clyde performance is after SEK8.8m of one-off acquisition costs but includes an R&D tax credit in the UK of c SEK3.5m.
■
Loss per share reduced to SEK0.65 compared to SEK0.86 in FY17, largely as a result of the increase in share count during the year for Clyde and the January SEK50m fund-raise.
■
We calculate an adjusted loss per share that improved to SEK0.55 compared to SEK0.86 in FY17. The adjustment excludes PPA (purchase price allocation) amortisation arising from the Clyde acquisition and a SEK1.5m fixed asset impairment, which we treat as exceptional.
■
Gross cash at 31 December 2018 was SEK12.2m (FY17: SEK37.2m).
■
Net cash at 31 December 2018 was SEK11.0m (FY17: SEK35.2m).
The purchase of Clyde Space with full year sales of c SEK60m completed on 30 January and has been consolidated since the start of February. This was funded by the issue of 30.5m shares at SEK11.62 per share to Clyde shareholders and £2m (SEK22.2m) of cash for a total consideration of SEK376m.
Following the deal, the balance sheet was strengthened by a targeted share placing that raised SEK50m before expenses through a placing at SEK7.65 per share. As a result, Clyde shareholders own around 44% of the enlarged share capital of the group.
While cash burn continued through the year, the performance was much improved in Q418 with a cash outflow of just SEK8.5m as EBITDA turned positive. Q218 and Q318 saw cash outflows of SEK15.0m and SEK18.1m, respectively. The Q118 outflow was SEK15.2m adjusting for the cash consideration for Clyde (SEK22.4m), the cash acquired with the business (SEK4.1m), and the proceeds from the Q1 capital raise.
Having more than achieved its guidance for FY18, ÅAC has provided little information with respect to the outlook. Similarly, we only have outline preliminary figures and not full disclosure of detailed financial elements. Nevertheless, we have developed a model based on some key assumptions.
We estimate that the number of microsatellites below 50kg set to be deployed globally each year should grow at a five-year CAGR of c 16% through 2023. We expect deliveries of subsystems from both Glasgow (nanosatellites/CubeSats) and Uppsala (microsatellites) to outperform this growth rate as new customers continue to be acquired. We expect revenue growth rates to be similar for each location as we assume higher volume growth with lower prices for nanosatellite subsystems equates to Uppsala’s more customised, lower volume, premium subsystems.
We expect ÅAC Clyde to deliver 15 satellite platforms this year including some larger 6U units.
Exhibit 10: ÅAC Microtec estimated satellite deliveries
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research estimates
|
The volume development is expected come from a mixture of development and test satellites as well as initial constellation requirements. We expect the latter to receive a first order this year and to start delivering in FY20, and to broadly equal the number of test satellites in FY19, which we estimate at 15 including some 6U platforms (eg Kepler’s TARS platform). The ramp up should then start to accelerate as more constellations are brought into the order book and commence deployment. From 2023, with an increasing number of satellites ending operational lifecycles, replenishment volumes should add to new deployments. A services revenue stream should also start to grow meaningfully once constellation commissioning has commenced. In addition, subsystems licensing agreements with other manufacturers such as York Systems and Ball Aerospace should provide a growing stream of royalties as they increase production volumes.
As the volume of satellites being manufactured increases, often with replication for the same constellation, there should be beneficial learning curve effects reducing the unit costs. In addition, a large proportion of bought-in components should benefit from improved pricing per unit on increased volume commitments.
After a relatively flat period in 2019 as the benefits of the integration of the two businesses are more fully absorbed, we expect staff numbers to grow to reflect the increase in deliveries. Our base assumption is that one 3U satellite construction takes about 1,500 hours, or effectively one fulltime employee a year. As progressive benefits from learning curve advances and product standardisation flow through, we would expect some increase in efficiency to be reflected in unit costs. In addition, we expect improved procurement prices as volumes rise.
Exhibit 11: ÅAC Microtec income statement estimates
Year to 31 December (SEKm) |
2017 |
2018 |
2019e |
2020e |
ÅAC |
13.3 |
30.7 |
41.4 |
55.3 |
Clyde |
0.0 |
47.1 |
79.4 |
145.1 |
Net sales |
13.3 |
77.9 |
120.8 |
200.4 |
Satellite platforms |
0.0 |
17.4 |
34.9 |
87.2 |
Subsystems |
13.3 |
54.0 |
82.9 |
105.2 |
Licence income |
0.0 |
6.5 |
3.0 |
8.0 |
Net sales |
13.3 |
77.9 |
120.8 |
200.4 |
Other operating income |
0.2 |
9.8 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
Revenue |
13.5 |
87.7 |
123.8 |
202.4 |
Development work capitalised |
3.9 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
3.2 |
Group income |
17.5 |
89.2 |
126.0 |
105.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials & subcontractors |
(5.0) |
(31.0) |
(42.3) |
(68.1) |
Personnel costs |
(20.5) |
(53.2) |
(56.8) |
(61.9) |
Other external expenses |
(13.0) |
(22.8) |
(26.0) |
(42.1) |
Other operating expenses |
(0.4) |
(0.7) |
0.0) |
0.0 |
Total operating expenses |
(38.9) |
(117.7) |
(125.1) |
(172.1) |
EBITDA |
(21.4) |
(28.5) |
0.9 |
33.6 |
EBITDA margin |
(161.1%) |
(36.6%) |
2.9% |
16.7% |
Depreciation |
(0.3) |
(0.4) |
(0.4) |
(0.5) |
EBITA (underlying) |
(21.7) |
(28.8) |
0.5 |
33.0 |
Amortisation (excl PPA) |
(5.6) |
(8.0) |
(9.0) |
(5.6) |
EBIT (underlying) |
(27.3) |
(36.9) |
(8.5) |
27.5 |
Exceptional items (incl PPA) |
0.0 |
(6.4) |
(5.3) |
(5.3) |
Net financial interest |
0.0 |
(0.3) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Profit before tax (underlying) |
(27.3) |
(37.2) |
(8.5) |
27.5 |
Profit before tax (reported) |
(27.3) |
(43.6) |
(13.8) |
22.2 |
Taxation |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
(2.7) |
Tax rate |
0% |
2% |
5% |
10% |
Net income (ongoing underlying) |
(27.3) |
(36.4) |
(8.0) |
24.7 |
EPS (SEK) - ongoing underlying |
(0.86) |
(0.55) |
(0.12) |
0.36 |
EPS (SEK) - reported |
(0.86) |
(0.65) |
(0.16) |
0.29 |
DPS (SEK) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Source: ÅAC Microtec reports, Edison Investment Research estimates
As a result, we are forecasting that the company moves to a modest EBITDA profit in FY19 and a positive adjusted EBIT of SEK27.5m in FY20.
Using our previously stated assumptions, we expect to see rapid growth in sales from both the satellite platforms and subsystems segments. The acceleration in growth seen in FY20 is expected to come from the rapid increase in satellite deliveries as constellation deployments begin. We expect steadier growth from the subsystems activities as the market continues to expand. The satellite delivery assumption is thus the biggest risk to our estimates although it is possible the risk could be to the upside.
The increase in revenues should move the company towards an EBITDA contribution, and this could be possible in the current year, although our model indicates a SEK1.5m EBITDA loss for FY19. We note that even if satellite platform revenues were flat between FY19 and FY20, we would expect a modest improvement in EBITDA.
Our expectation for cash flow is therefore for a modest outflow this year, as profitability improves but working capital continues to expand to support growth, including increased inventory of standardised products. We expect a more significant cash inflow in FY20 and expect net cash to fall to SEK5.0m this year before rising to SEK24.0m in FY20.
It should be noted that ÅAC does have a SEK5m overdraft facility that remains undrawn, which provides a modest amount of financial headroom. Nevertheless, the margin for mishaps appears relatively modest and we would not be surprised to see a further capital raise in the relatively near future to underpin growth and provide further funds for strategic M&A.