The market for location data
In May 2017 the Economist suggested that data was now the world’s most valuable resource. Precise and verifiable data on consumers and in particular on their purchasing behaviour would be a hugely valuable resource for any consumer-focused business. The following comments reflect prominent views on the potential value of this genre of data.
■
“The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data.” The Economist, 6 May 2017
■
“Snap Wants to Help Brands Track When Ads Drive People to Locations” Wall Street Journal,12 April 2017
■
WPP’s Sir Martin Sorrell calling for more third-party measurement. “Clearly it's an example where the player and referee cannot be the same person or where you cannot mark your own homework.” The Drum, 16 November 2016
Analysing consumer behaviour
At its core, Location Sciences provides a better understanding of a consumer’s behaviour, making its services useful to a wide variety of consumer-facing industries and to media companies targeting those customers.
For example, if a particular consumer goes to the same location five days a week then Location Sciences can ‘learn’ that this is their workplace. If they go to a gym three times a week after work, they may be keen on fitness, and so the picture builds, allowing the brand to build a precise image of millions of consumers.
Measuring the effectiveness of ad spend (attribution)
John Wanamaker (1838-1922, US merchant and politician) said, “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half.” With intelligent audience targeting, performance-based pricing and data analysis, today advertisers should have a better understanding of which advertising spend yields the best results.
A customer’s online journey can now be tracked from ad click to online store. However, offline Wanamaker’s advertising truism still stands. Location intelligence can join the dots between online and offline behaviour, tracking and analysing the effectiveness of driving a customer to the shop. This makes it valuable to advertising agencies seeking to demonstrate the effectiveness of their marketing strategies or to the OOH advertising industry to demonstrate footfall passing their real estate.
The industry is coming under increasing pressure to improve the transparency of the media buying process. Some of the most dominant companies such as Google, Facebook and WPP saw the services they offer come under scrutiny as the demand for transparency and accountability across the marketing industry rose.
In this regard, Location Sciences is the referee and not the player, helping to regulate the digital ad sector, ensuring fairness and transparency for which agencies and brands are prepared to pay a premium.
Large and growing addressable market
With such an expanse of potential user cases, pinpointing a precise addressable market is not possible. However, to add context, annual advertising spend on mobile and OOH in the UK was estimated by IAB to be a combined £6.6bn in 2017, while total advertising spend was £22bn according to the Advertising Association.
In most markets, mobile advertising has already surpassed desktop, and it continues to grow. In April 2017 IAB forecast UK mobile advertising to increase from £3.8bn in 2016 to £5.4bn in 2017.
Furthermore, location data is becoming a key component of all aspects of the campaign lifecycle. BIA Kelsey estimated that in 2016 38% of mobile media was based on location, although the majority of this was the lower quality bid stream data provided by ad exchanges. IAB/Kelsey also projects location-targeted mobile ad spending in the US to almost double over the next five years.
With 7.3m consumers and 14bn data points, Location Sciences is positioned competitively among its peers in the UK. While reliable data is scarce in a very young industry, this looks to put Location Sciences in a strong position competitively.
Further, location data is being used across an increasing range of industries: city and transport planning, financial services and mobile advertising, and is increasingly used in advertising attribution. We believe this market is set to see substantial growth over the next few years. Location Sciences’ precise geo-location technology gives it early-mover advantage in the UK. With regards to changes in regulation, the Location Sciences risk management team monitors closely the likely direction of policy change and indeed sees the new GDPR regulations as an opportunity for Locations Sciences to grow, through fully compliant, audited and permissioned first-party mobile data. This is not necessarily the position of other data providers using third party data.
We profile potential competitors below. Location Sciences’ nearest UK competitors are Rippll and Tamoco. These companies both have a smaller consumer base with limited working capital to enable them to increase scale.
Foursquare is a US-based local search and discovery service mobile app that provides its users with personalised local search experiences. It gathers location data from its users to improve its customers’ experiences and inform business decisions for its corporate customers. The company’s website notes that the company has 50 million ‘people’ worldwide of which the majority are in the US, although its 12bn data points imply less depth to the data than that Location Sciences can achieve.
Cuebiq‘s website states that it accesses 61m smart phones in the US with an average of 100+ data points per user per day, which is suggests that the clarity and completeness of its view of consumer behaviour rivals that of Location Sciences. The company also states that it accesses MAUs via 180+ apps. At this stage we understand that Cuebiq has only just begun to look outside the US.
Factual, another US-based company, claims to be the leader in location data but rather than providing any major insights into consumer behaviour it creates lists to sell to businesses and advertisers of, for example, people who visit McDonald’s. Although that remains the main focus of the business, Factual has recently launched Geopulse Measurement, which helps brands understand whether their ads are actually convincing people to visit their stores. This can include testing different ads to see which are driving more visits. The data is delivered to clients in real time, so campaigns can be consistently tweaked to improve performance.
Significant players not in direct competition
Google, along with Facebook and Twitter, has extensive ‘closed book’ data. Google can tell you how a campaign has performed to the extent that it can say how many people were targeted but its job is to sell media and audiences to advertisers and brands. The drawback to Google’s data is that there is no independent verification of the data as it is both poacher and gamekeeper.
Facebook also sells media rather than location data, so is not in direct competition with Location Sciences, and similar to Google, it is not independent. The complication that this poses to brands was clearly demonstrated by its admissions in October 2016 regarding miscalculation in its metrics. This led to an audit by the Media Rating Council and a change in policy by Facebook to ensure that its verification partners receive more detailed information about its ad impressions on Facebook and Instagram to help provide better insights to advertisers.