BRSA: A unique combination of value and ESG factors
BRSA has a dual objective to outpace the performance of, and to ensure that its portfolio ESG characteristics (as measured by MSCI) are higher than those of its reference index. With its focus on bottom-up stock selection, the trust is well positioned to take advantage of a stock market that is driven by company fundamentals rather than macroeconomic developments. While the US market was led by the ‘magnificent seven’ technology stocks in 2023 (Apple, Amazon.com, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Nvidia and Tesla), they are suffering mixed fortunes in 2024. A broader market leadership should also be beneficial for BRSA’s performance.
Market performance and valuation
The S&P 500 has performed significantly better than both US value stocks and the UK market over the last decade. A large part of this has been due to the outperformance of large-cap technology shares, which were particularly strong in 2023 helped by their exposure to artificial intelligence (AI), which is deemed to have significant, long-term growth potential.
Exhibit 1: Performance of indices over the last decade (£)
|
|
Source: LSEG, Edison Investment Research
|
Exhibit 2: S&P 500 Index sector total returns ($)
% |
4M24* |
% |
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
Comm'n services |
13.4 |
IT |
57.8 |
Energy |
65.4 |
Energy |
54.4 |
IT |
43.9 |
Energy |
12.8 |
Comm'n services |
55.8 |
Utilities |
1.6 |
Real estate |
46.1 |
Cons discretionary |
33.3 |
Financials |
7.8 |
Cons discretionary |
42.3 |
Consumer staples |
(0.6) |
Financials |
34.9 |
Comm'n services |
23.6 |
Industrials |
7.0 |
Industrials |
18.1 |
Healthcare |
(2.0) |
IT |
34.5 |
Materials |
20.7 |
IT |
6.6 |
Materials |
12.6 |
Industrials |
(5.5) |
Materials |
27.3 |
Healthcare |
13.5 |
Consumer staples |
6.6 |
Real estate |
12.3 |
Financials |
(10.6) |
Healthcare |
26.1 |
Industrials |
11.1 |
Utilities |
6.3 |
Financials |
12.1 |
Materials |
(12.3) |
Cons discretionary |
24.4 |
Consumer staples |
10.8 |
Materials |
4.0 |
Healthcare |
2.1 |
Real estate |
(26.2) |
Comm'n services |
21.6 |
Utilities |
0.5 |
Healthcare |
3.3 |
Consumer staples |
0.5 |
IT |
(28.2) |
Industrials |
21.1 |
Financials |
(1.8) |
Cons discretionary |
0.4 |
Energy |
(1.4) |
Cons discretionary |
(37.0) |
Consumer staples |
18.6 |
Real estate |
(2.2) |
Real estate |
(9.0) |
Utilities |
(7.1) |
Comm'n services |
(39.9) |
Utilities |
17.7 |
Energy |
(33.7) |
Total |
6.0 |
Total |
26.3 |
Total |
(18.1) |
Total |
28.7 |
Total |
18.4 |
Source: Bloomberg. Note: *To 30 April 2024.
The valuation of the broad US market continues to look unappealing. As shown in Exhibit 3, using Datastream indices, on a forward P/E basis the US is trading at a c 24% premium to the world market, and its 20.5x multiple is a 13% premium to its 10-year average. The US is also trading on a much higher price-to-book multiple than the world market. Although the US market has a superior return on equity, it offers a meaningfully lower dividend yield.
Exhibit 3: Valuation metrics of Datastream indices (at 8 May 2024)
|
Last |
High |
Low |
10-year average |
Last as % of average |
US |
|
|
|
|
|
P/E 12 months forward (x) |
20.5 |
23.4 |
14.0 |
18.2 |
113 |
Price to book (x) |
4.5 |
4.6 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
137 |
Dividend yield (%) |
1.4 |
2.7 |
1.2 |
1.8 |
76 |
Return on equity (%) |
16.1 |
18.6 |
9.9 |
14.2 |
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
P/E 12 months forward (x) |
16.6 |
19.9 |
12.5 |
15.7 |
106 |
Price to book (x) |
2.3 |
2.3 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
122 |
Dividend yield (%) |
2.2 |
3.4 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
90 |
Return on equity (%) |
12.3 |
14.0 |
7.4 |
11.3 |
109 |
Source: LSEG, Edison Investment Research
Perspectives from one of BRSA’s managers
Yang says that although BRSA’s stock selection is on a bottom-up basis, the managers do consider the macroeconomic background. She notes that the US economy has held up well, helped by COVID-19 stimulus, and the labour market has remained strong. The manager believes that the US is in the later stages of the current economic cycle, and there is a risk that higher wages could put upward pressure on inflation (keeping it above the targeted 2.0% level), limiting the Federal Reserve’s ability to reduce interest rates. Yang considers this scenario presents a risk to the US stock market, as the consensus expectation is for lower interest rates.
The manager highlights that the current forward P/E multiple of the US market is notably above its long-term average. However, she sees opportunities in US value stocks, which are trading at a record discount to the overall market. Yang points to a recent publication by BlackRock that suggests while passive investment has been increasingly favoured by investors, going forward, active management will be more important. Following the global financial crisis and before the onset of COVID-19, there was a unique period known as the great moderation, where interest rates, inflation and stock market volatility were low, and there was a narrow dispersion of equity returns. The manager anticipates increased stock market volatility and a higher dispersion between equity returns, due to sticky inflation, higher interest rates and other factors including geopolitics and decarbonisation, which she says makes a strong case for active versus passive investment.
Yang highlights that looking back to 1975, following a peak in interest rates there has been a subsequent recession. With the valuation gap between the reference index and the bellwether S&P 500 Index at the widest point versus history, the manager sees opportunities to invest in high-quality stocks with strong cash flows, robust balance sheets and well-regarded management teams. Yang says that high-quality and low-beta stocks tend to outperform following interest rate hiking cycles and she is finding examples of these types of stocks in the consumer staples and healthcare sectors that are trading on lower valuation multiples than their 1996–2023 historical averages. This suggests that investors are not positioned for a stock market downturn.
Current portfolio positioning
Exhibit 4 shows BRSA’s geographic exposure. Over the 12 months to the end of March 2024, there is a notably higher allocation to US stocks (+7.2pp). This was partially offset by the disposal of the trust’s Japanese stocks (-3.9pp) and a lower UK weighting (-2.3pp).
Exhibit 4: Portfolio geographic exposure (% unless stated)
|
Portfolio end-March 2024 |
Portfolio end-March 2023 |
Change (pp) |
US |
89.1 |
81.9 |
7.2 |
UK |
5.1 |
7.4 |
(2.3) |
France |
2.0 |
2.6 |
(0.6) |
South Korea |
1.5 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
Australia |
1.2 |
1.7 |
(0.5) |
Switzerland |
1.1 |
0.0 |
1.1 |
Japan |
0.0 |
3.9 |
(3.9) |
Canada |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
Denmark |
0.0 |
1.0 |
(1.0) |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Source: BRSA, Edison Investment Research. Note: Rebased for net current assets/liabilities.
While the US market provides a wide opportunity set, Yang says that with this market trading at a premium valuation multiple to its historical average, better opportunities may be found overseas. She highlights the global pharma industry, where US companies are facing declining revenues due to an impending patent cliff, so they need to invest to bolster their product pipelines. The manager contrasts this with European pharma companies, whose revenues are expected to rise over the next decade based on their base revenues, with any successful product launches providing incremental sales.
Exhibit 5: Portfolio sector exposure versus reference index (% unless stated)
|
Portfolio end-March 2024 |
Portfolio end-March 2023 |
Change (pp) |
Active weight vs index (pp) |
Financials |
20.2 |
19.1 |
1.1 |
(0.8) |
Healthcare |
18.6 |
20.7 |
(2.1) |
5.0 |
Information technology |
16.0 |
15.3 |
0.7 |
7.7 |
Consumer discretionary |
9.2 |
10.3 |
(1.1) |
0.6 |
Industrials |
7.9 |
6.2 |
1.7 |
(8.6) |
Energy |
7.2 |
8.7 |
(1.5) |
(0.9) |
Consumer staples |
6.4 |
6.2 |
0.2 |
(0.6) |
Communication services |
5.1 |
4.3 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
Materials |
4.2 |
3.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Utilities |
3.7 |
4.1 |
(0.5) |
(1.3) |
Real estate |
1.6 |
1.4 |
0.2 |
(3.0) |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Source: BRSA, Edison Investment Research. Note: Rebased for net current assets/liabilities.
Exhibit 6: BRSA’s sector exposure versus its reference index at end-March 2024
|
|
Source: BRSA, Edison Investment Research. Note: Numbers subject to rounding.
|
There were modest changes in BRSA’s sector exposure in the 12 months to the end of March 2024 (Exhibit 5). Yang explains that the trust has been overweight healthcare stocks for a long time because of the industry’s structural growth drivers, which are supported by an ageing global population. BRSA’s largest overweight position is technology. An increasing number of stocks in this sector are what the managers refer to as industrial technology, which are companies with defensible competitive positions, well positioned to take advantage of long-term growth opportunities and are generating strong earnings and cash flow. This has led to a growing number of technology companies paying dividends to shareholders. The trust retains a notable underweight exposure to industrial stocks given the advanced stage of the current economic cycle and generally unattractive valuations. Other underweight sectors include real estate as these stocks are unattractively valued and utilities because the managers consider that climate change risks are not priced into these companies’ stock prices.
At the end of March 2024, BRSA’s top 10 holdings made up 26.1% of the portfolio, which was a modestly lower concentration compared with 27.3% a year before; five positions were common to both periods.
Exhibit 7: Top 10 holdings (at 31 March 2024)
Company |
Country |
Sector |
Portfolio weight % |
31 March 2024 |
31 March 2023* |
Citigroup |
US |
Financials |
3.6 |
2.6 |
American International Group |
US |
Financials |
3.0 |
N/A |
Shell |
UK |
Energy |
2.6 |
2.6 |
Kraft Heinz |
US |
Consumer staples |
2.5 |
N/A |
Cardinal Health |
US |
Healthcare |
2.5 |
N/A |
Baxter International |
US |
Healthcare |
2.4 |
2.5 |
Johnson Controls International |
US |
Industrials |
2.4 |
N/A |
Cisco Systems |
US |
Information technology |
2.4 |
3.0 |
Verizon Communications |
US |
Communication services |
2.4 |
2.6 |
Fidelity National Information Services |
US |
Information technology |
2.3 |
N/A |
Top 10 (% of portfolio) |
|
|
26.1 |
27.3 |
Source: BRSA, Edison Investment Research. Note: *N/A where not in end-March 2023 top 10.
Comparing BRSA’s portfolio with the reference index at the end of January 2024, it had a similar gross dividend yield and considerably higher dividend growth. Its return on equity and forward earnings growth outlook was modestly lower but the portfolio was more attractively valued at a c 20% discount to the reference index and a much wider discount versus the US market.
Exhibit 8: Portfolio characteristics at 31 January 2024
|
Portfolio |
Reference index |
Difference (%) |
Number of holdings |
60 |
846 |
(92.9) |
Gross dividend yield (%) |
2.4 |
2.3 |
0.1 |
Dividend growth (5Y annualised, %) |
8.2 |
5.4 |
2.8 |
Return on equity (%) |
13.8 |
12.8 |
1.0 |
Forward EPS growth (%) |
10.7 |
10.0 |
0.7 |
Forward P/E multiple (x) |
12.7 |
15.8 |
(19.6) |
Source: BRSA, Edison Investment Research
Recent portfolio transactions
As normal, in Q124, portfolio activity occurred across a range of industries. The largest purchases included: Avnet (electronic products distribution); Diageo (UK-based, alcoholic beverages); PG&E (electric and natural gas utility); Sensata Technologies (sensors); WPP (UK-based, communications and advertising); and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (transportation equipment).
The following positions were sold: Acuity Brands (lighting and building management); First American Financial (financial services); Gildan Activewear (Canada-based, apparel); Komatsu (Japan-based, construction, mining & utility equipment); Mattel (toys); Nestlé (Switzerland-based, food & beverages); and TransUnion (consumer credit ratings).