Borussia Dortmund’s business model
Borussia Dortmund’s corporate objective is to defend its position in the top-flight of the Bundesliga, to be achieved by a five-pronged business strategy:
■
Sustainably adjusting athletic prospects: maximising sporting success, namely continuing at the top level of the Bundesliga, continuous qualification for the Champions League, and progress in other competitions without incurring new debt.
■
Intensifying the promotion of up-and-coming talent: as can be seen from the club’s sporting success (above) and transfer activity (see later), Borussia Dortmund has a proven and enviable track record of identifying, through a worldwide scouting network, and nurturing talent. There is potentially a conflict between the club’s sporting success and the company’s financial interests, a player may be sold based on financial considerations rather than the potential effect it may have on the team’s performance.
■
Increasing fan involvement: expanding fan services and opportunities for them to engage with the club via different media, including television and social media.
■
Using and maintaining the Borussia Dortmund brand: further domestic and international marketing of the brand name through, for example, the playing of ‘friendly’ games in international markets, and selling of inventory on digital advertising boards in the stadium to more global/regional advertising partners.
■
Structuring business activities and relationships sustainably: to grow the company’s multiples revenue streams and actively manage costs so that the company does not incur new debt.
Supporting the above strategy are structural growth drivers of the team is one of the most successful and well-known German football clubs, with one of the highest average number of spectators in Europe, and Germany is one Europe’s largest football markets, but it lags other markets in terms of media exploitation rights.
Borussia Dortmund reports revenue from five sources: match operations (ticket receipts for attendance at games), advertising (sponsorship and advertising from companies), TV marketing (broadcast rights), merchandising, and conference, catering and miscellaneous.
Below we show how the revenue sources have evolved since FY05, when IFRS was adopted. We have combined merchandising and conference, catering and miscellaneous revenues into ‘Other’ as there was a minor change to revenue disclosure between FY14 and FY15.
Exhibit 5: Sources of revenue
|
|
|
|
Source: Borussia Dortmund, Edison Investment Research
|
Source: Borussia Dortmund, Edison Investment Research
|
Exhibit 5: Sources of revenue
|
|
Source: Borussia Dortmund, Edison Investment Research
|
|
|
Source: Borussia Dortmund, Edison Investment Research
|
Borussia Dortmund’s revenue has grown from €75m in FY05 to €352m in FY22, a CAGR of c 10% per year, significantly ahead of German GDP growth. COVID-19-related restrictions have hampered revenue growth in the last three financial years, revenue was broadly stable in FY20 versus FY19, declined by c 10% in FY21, and partially recovered with growth of 5% in FY22.
Management’s success in better national and international exploitation of the brand is demonstrated by a revenue decline in only two years since FY05 and before the COVID-19 pandemic (FY09 and FY18), which followed seasons when the team achieved greater success than in a typical year. TV marketing has become the most important source of revenue, increasing from 20% of the total in FY05 to 41% in FY22. Advertising has become the second most important revenue source at 29% of the total in FY22, having been the most important revenue source in FY05 at 36%. Given their relatively predictable nature, the partnerships for are typically structured under medium-or long-term agreements with key corporate partners and are less dependent on sporting success, its increased contribution improves the overall visibility of Borussia Dortmund’s revenue.
Before a change in accounting standards in FY20, Borussia Dortmund included gross revenue from transfer deals in total group revenue. The charts above exclude transfer deal revenue, which, due to its nature, fluctuates between financial years. In this note, any reference to revenue excludes transfer deals, unless stated otherwise. For completeness, Exhibit 7 shows revenue including transfers.
Exhibit 7: Revenue including transfers
|
|
Source: Borussia Dortmund, Edison Investment Research
|
TV marketing (41% of FY22 revenue)
TV marketing is revenue earned from the broadcasting rights of the games played by the team. It has grown at a CAGR of c 14% since FY05 due to long-term inflation in media rights from increased demand for premium content from competing media platforms and the team’s improved and more consistent on-pitch success. It is the company’s most important revenue source, with a high degree of visibility in the near and medium term for the largest revenue source (ie domestic, Bundesliga rights), whereas International TV and Domestic Cup are more dependent on success on the pitch.
Exhibit 8: TV marketing revenue
€m |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Domestic TV |
|
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
20.4 |
20.2 |
26.8 |
27.9 |
29.7 |
39.1 |
43.6 |
60.8 |
66.1 |
88.0 |
98.1 |
97.7 |
97.8 |
78.5 |
International TV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
25.6 |
55.4 |
36.2 |
32.5 |
17.2 |
51.0 |
31.8 |
68.1 |
67.4 |
78.7 |
62.7 |
Domestic Cup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
6.9 |
2.5 |
6.1 |
6.0 |
4.4 |
8.6 |
2.6 |
1.2 |
4.7 |
10.1 |
3.8 |
Total |
14.9 |
14.8 |
21.3 |
26.0 |
22.4 |
21.1 |
32.1 |
60.4 |
87.6 |
81.4 |
82.1 |
82.6 |
125.8 |
122.3 |
167.3 |
169.8 |
186.7 |
145.1 |
Source: Borussia Dortmund
Marketing of media rights is conducted centrally by the organisers of their respective competitions (the Bundesliga and UEFA), hence it is outside Borussia Dortmund’s control. However, the system of revenue distribution to clubs is defined well in advance, which provides a high level of visibility.
The German broadcasting rights for the four seasons 2021/22 to 2024/25 were sold for €4.4bn, a reduction of c €240m or 5% from the prior contract. The lower proceeds reflected the timing of the auction during the height of economic uncertainty and COVID-19 lockdowns. The prior domestic Bundesliga contract for the four seasons 2017/18 to 2020/21 was worth €4.64bn or €1.16bn per season, an increase of c 85% on the prior contract for four seasons 2013/14 to 2016/17 of €2.5bn in total or €625m per season. This has been helped by the persistent emergence of new entrants to the media landscape. Management believes there is significant opportunity to further develop Bundesliga rights; it estimates 2020–21 Bundesliga broadcasting revenue of €1.4bn, versus Spain’s La Liga at €2bn and England’s Premier League at €3.4bn.
Distributions from the broadcasting rights are made based on four ‘pillars’, or criteria, including the ranking of the teams over different time periods and the playing time of younger players, to encourage youth development, versus two pillars previously. Distributions from international rights are made based on three pillars, with a proportion shared equally between the clubs and the remainder based on performance. To help clubs manage the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, in the first two years of the current contract, a lower share will be split based on team performance, increasing revenue to smaller clubs at the detriment of the larger clubs.
UEFA is responsible for the centralised marketing of all media and commercial rights for all European club competitions, and subsequent distributions to competing clubs. The rights are typically sold in three-year cycles: the current cycle covers the seasons from 2021/22 to 2023/24. The current rights in Germany are held by Amazon, DAZN and ZDF. Distributions to Champions League participants are based on four ‘pillars’: 25% to the clubs that participate in the group stage; 30% for performance in the latter knockout stages of the competition (ie round of 16 onwards) with escalating fees per game (Borussia Dortmund is currently second in its group after three games); 30% based on a coefficient that ranks a team’s 10-year relative success in the competition (the newly added pillar); and 15% based on the value of the club’s own TV market relative to all countries (ie the market pool). To highlight the sensitivity of this income to a team's success, in FY21 the winners of the Champions League, Chelsea generated revenue of €120m (source: UEFA Annual Report 2021) versus Borussia Dortmund’s €79m from reaching the quarter final, and Villareal €33m for winning the Europa League.
Advertising (36% of FY22 revenue)
Advertising is the sponsorship income from Borussia Dortmund’s key corporate partners as well as advertising on the billboards in the ground and bonuses dependent of the team’s success. It has grown at a CAGR of 9% since FY05.
The resilience of the income stream is demonstrated by it growing by c 18% y-o-y to €126m in FY22, following 9% growth in FY21, despite the challenging economic environment due to the COVID pandemic. The increases were due to a combination of new sponsorship deals or extensions to existing major ones (Evonik, 1&1 Telecommunications), higher prize money (FY21) while sponsor hospitality and match day advertising have been a bit more variable, recovering in FY22 after declines in FY21.
Sponsorship revenue is typically earned from multi-year contracts, although there are annual contracts too, with leading international and regional companies that want to be connected with sporting success and to promote their brands. The company has a proven ability to renew at higher prices or by attracting new partners (sponsors).
The company’s principal partners, representing approximately half of total advertising revenue, are:
■
Evonik Industries, a speciality chemicals group, is the sponsor of the team shirt in international competitions, friendlies abroad and the DFB-Pokal from FY21–25. It has been the shirt sponsor since 2007.
■
Signal Iduna, an insurance company, has been connected with the club since 1974. It has been the sponsor of the stadium since December 2005 and the partnership was recently extended to 2031 (from 2026).
■
Puma has been the sporting equipment partner since FY13 and the extended contract runs to 2028. Prior sponsors have included Nike and Kappa.
■
1&1, a telecommunications company, sponsor of the first team shirt in the Bundesliga from FY21–25.
Before splitting sponsorship by competition from FY21, Evonik had been the sole shirt sponsor since July 2006. Opel became the team’s first ever shirt sleeve sponsor from FY18, when clubs were allowed to find their own partners, prior to which sleeve sponsorship of all Bundesliga teams was sold under a centralised deal. Principal partners tend to be shareholders of the company to strengthen the relationship with the club.
In addition to the principal partners above, there are three different levels of partner, which contribute differing levels of income in return for varying levels of sponsorship benefits: BVB ChampionPartner (10 partners including comdirect, bwin and FIFA 23), BVB PremiumPartner (13 partners including Coca-Cola, L’Oréal and Eurowings) and BVB Partner (18 partners including ARAL and H-Hotels.com).
In FY22, the company added new sponsors including General Logistics Systems Germany (for one year), Sky Deutschland (minimum of four years) and Kettler (one year), and extended sponsorships with bwin (to FY24), Radeberger (to FY28), ESET (to FY25), RWE (to FY26), Eurowing, ATLAS (to FY27), Frostkrone Food Group (to FY23) and Dortmunder Stadtwerke (FY24). Therefore, we can see that long-term relationships are important for other partners outside the principal partners listed above.
We believe the long-term principal partnerships represent over half of Borussia Dortmund’s advertising and should be relatively predictable given the multi-year relationships. For other partners, it is likely some revenue is sensitive to the economic cycle.
The activity of seeking new sponsors is currently outsourced to Sportfive, a media group, which receives a commission on revenue generated. For Borussia Dortmund, commission and expenses are reported as Advertising within other operating expenses. Over time, the effective commission rate has reduced from 31% of reported advertising revenue to 25/26%, but a new licensing agreement from FY21 reduced the agency commission to c 10% of revenue.
Match operations (6% of FY22 revenue)
Match operations represents revenue earned from the attendance of fans at its home ground, Signal Iduna Park, as well as from friendly games played by the team including overseas tours, which typically take place before the start of the new season and during the winter break.
Management regards Signal Iduna Park, Germany’s largest football stadium with capacity for 81,365 fans, as its most valuable asset apart from the team.
Exhibit 9: Match operations revenue
€m |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Domestic |
|
|
|
16.7 |
18.7 |
N/D |
23.5 |
24.5 |
25.6 |
26.0 |
26.9 |
27.1 |
27.0 |
27.4 |
28.2 |
20.4 |
0.5 |
17.7 |
International |
|
|
|
|
|
N/D |
3.4 |
4.4 |
16.2 |
10.0 |
7.6 |
13.4 |
9.5 |
9.1 |
7.5 |
8.8 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
National Cup |
|
|
|
4.1 |
1.2 |
N/D |
|
1.9 |
2.4 |
3.7 |
4.5 |
3.7 |
5.3 |
2.2 |
2.7 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
Friendlies |
|
|
|
1.8 |
2.3 |
N/D |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
2.5 |
2.2 |
3.5 |
6.3 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
Match Operations |
17.5 |
17.2 |
18.3 |
22.6 |
22.2 |
23.4 |
27.7 |
31.4 |
44.8 |
40.5 |
39.9 |
46.8 |
43.9 |
42.3 |
44.7 |
32.5 |
0.6 |
22.7 |
Source: Borussia Dortmund
Within match operations, the company separately discloses revenues from domestic (Bundesliga games), international (UEFA competitions), national cup (DFB-Pokal) and friendlies (tours).
Revenue is a function of the number of games played, the number of fans attending and price per ticket. In ‘normal’ circumstances, there is a relatively predictable element to domestic revenue, the most significant source of revenue, as there are 17 home Bundesliga games in every season, which are typically sold out. Over the long term, there has been a gradual increase in the capacity of the stadium as the ground has been updated, and management’s policy with respect to ticket prices is typically to grow them by inflation. The club benefits from the advance sale of 55,000 season tickets, which brings revenue visibility. The ticket price varies depending on location in the ground, the competition and opposition being played and concessions.
Revenue from other competitions is less predictable given these include knockout competitions and revenues are shared in different ways. For example, net income (revenue less stadium costs) from DFB-Pokal games is split equally between the two competing teams, and in the latter stages of the Champions League the home team receives all of the ticket income.
After the disruption caused by COVID-19, match operations revenue should see a strong improvement in FY23, in the absence of further COVID-19-related restrictions. We forecast revenue growth of c 76% in FY23 to c €40m. In FY21, the majority of home games were behind closed doors, ie with no fans, therefore total match operations revenue from all competitions was just €554k versus the pre-COVID peak of €44.7m in FY19. At the start of FY22, the Bundesliga and local authorities allowed the gradual return of fans to games, and the club operated with restricted capacity in other competitions too. In the early (Q122) Bundesliga games, capacity was restricted to 25,000 fans, and gradually built to over 60,000 in the first games in Q222 before the Omicron strain emerged and attendance was restricted again (750–30,000 plus fans through Q322) before reaching full capacity (81,365 fans) for some of the games towards the end of the season. Therefore, over the 21/22 season, the average crowd was c 38,000, well below capacity of 81,365. FY23 has started well with the stadium operating at or near capacity and the club recommenced the sale of the customary 55,000 season tickets.
Other (16% of FY22 revenue)
We aggregate a number of revenue streams, merchandising and conference, catering and miscellaneous income, as disclosed by the company, into ‘other’, due to change in disclosure between FY13 to FY14. As well as the more obvious revenue streams, it includes booking fees for the sale of tickets and fees received for squad players who represent their national teams, so it can be variable.
Before COVID-19, the revenue CAGR was 11% per year, but growth was naturally hampered through COVID-19 given the dependence on some of the revenue streams with attendance at the stadiums. Therefore, with expectations of greater fan attendance in FY23 than FY22, we forecast growth of c 19% for the combined revenues to c €69m.
Merchandising represents the award of licences and revenue from the sale of team merchandise (eg replica team kits). In addition to partners’ wholesale distribution channels, sales are made via a major FanWelt centre near the stadium, branded stores (FanShops) in Dortmund, sales kiosks at the stadium and e-commerce (www.bvbonlineshop.com). Growth should be driven by the increasing global appeal of the brand, as well as the company’s ability to increase and improve the range of merchandising.
Conference and catering is closely linked to attendance at the stadium as well as the company’s ability to monetise improved (ie higher value) hospitality.
Squad development and transfers
Borussia Dortmund’s strategy has been the development of a competitive team with a focus on identifying promising young players at minimal cost (even free), who can then be further developed at the BVB Academy. It currently has a worldwide network of about 30 scouts.
Over the long term, Borussia Dortmund has a proven track record of prudent investment in talent. Below, we show the net transfer spend per season (amount received less amount spent on the squad) in the last 10 seasons for the first team squads of a range of Borussia Dortmund’s competitive peers, including the large/leading clubs in Germany and Europe. We also include cumulative totals for the 23 seasons from 2001–23.
Exhibit 10: Net transfer spend (€m)
Club |
13/14 |
14/15 |
15/16 |
16/17 |
17/18 |
18/19 |
19/20 |
20/21 |
21/22 |
22/23 |
Cum. 2014-23 |
Cum. 2001-23 |
European peers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlético Madrid |
34 |
(55) |
33 |
(35) |
8 |
(110) |
64 |
(6) |
(63) |
(18) |
(148) |
(262) |
Barcelona |
(73) |
(85) |
13 |
(91) |
(142) |
5 |
(148) |
30 |
49 |
(106) |
(548) |
(991) |
Chelsea |
(52) |
5 |
(9) |
(24) |
(66) |
(125) |
112 |
(188) |
2 |
(225) |
(570) |
(1,323) |
Internazionale |
(49) |
7 |
13 |
(141) |
(58) |
(11) |
(125) |
(26) |
161 |
(27) |
(256) |
(429) |
Juventus |
24 |
(36) |
(101) |
13 |
(19) |
(152) |
(21) |
(36) |
3 |
2 |
(323) |
(631) |
Liverpool |
(26) |
(52) |
(36) |
5 |
11 |
(141) |
34 |
(65) |
(12) |
(15) |
(297) |
(593) |
Manchester City |
(104) |
(72) |
(141) |
(180) |
(226) |
(21) |
(89) |
(100) |
(89) |
20 |
(1,002) |
(1,664) |
Manchester United |
(75) |
(149) |
(55) |
(138) |
(153) |
(52) |
(154) |
(65) |
(110) |
(227) |
(1,178) |
(1,496) |
Paris Saint-Germain |
(109) |
(47) |
(93) |
(75) |
(140) |
(113) |
11 |
(62) |
(74) |
(84) |
(786) |
(1,115) |
Real Madrid |
(62) |
(13) |
(70) |
8 |
92 |
(27) |
(220) |
104 |
47 |
11 |
(130) |
(887) |
Bundesliga teams: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayern Munich |
(22) |
(5) |
(58) |
(18) |
(84) |
74 |
(86) |
(40) |
(58) |
(30) |
(327) |
(668) |
Borussia Dortmund |
(5) |
(60) |
23 |
(30) |
161 |
24 |
(16) |
(43) |
63 |
(11) |
106 |
26 |
Bayer 04 Leverkusen |
11 |
(20) |
5 |
(40) |
35 |
14 |
(63) |
45 |
(11) |
(4) |
(28) |
(53) |
Borussia Mönchengladbach |
(5) |
5 |
(22) |
4 |
(6) |
0 |
(6) |
(14) |
(11) |
(1) |
(56) |
(85) |
Schalke |
(18) |
4 |
20 |
18 |
(42) |
(16) |
(10) |
4 |
39 |
7 |
6 |
(33) |
RB Leipzig |
(3) |
(23) |
(24) |
(95) |
(39) |
7 |
(34) |
2 |
4 |
15 |
(191) |
(192) |
Source: www.transfermarkt.com
Borussia Dortmund has been the only the club to generate a net surplus on transfers over the long-term, from 2001–23, and one of two clubs (including Schalke) to generate a net surplus over the last 10 years, which testimony to its ability to recruit and trade talent over the long term. Although there is an element of subjectivity in valuing the current squad, the above provides some comfort there is unrealised value in the current squad versus its book value.
According to www.transfermarkt.com Borussia Dortmund has the 17th most valuable first-team squad of the 500 valued globally, with an estimated value of c €483m versus the purchase cost of €340m. The estimated value of the squad has declined by 20% y-o-y, primarily due to the sale of Erling Haaland in the summer of 2022, who was, and still is, valued at €150m. Below we show the estimated market values in descending order for the top 20 most valuable global football squads. All but two of the clubs, Manchester United and West Ham United, have squad’s that are estimated to have a higher market value than the purchase cost.
Exhibit 11: Most valuable football squads (€m)
Club |
Country |
Market value October 2022 (€m) |
Market value October 2021 (€m) |
Market value October 2020 (€m) |
Change y-o-y (%) |
Purchase cost (€m) |
Unrealised gain (€m) |
Unrealised gain (%) |
Manchester City |
England |
1,060 |
1,080 |
1,050 |
(2) |
1,010 |
50 |
5 |
Liverpool |
England |
925 |
867 |
1,090 |
7 |
667 |
258 |
39 |
Paris Saint-Germain |
France |
890 |
990 |
842 |
(10) |
730 |
160 |
22 |
Bayern Munich |
Germany |
879 |
841 |
874 |
5 |
452 |
427 |
95 |
Chelsea |
England |
862 |
891 |
852 |
(3) |
758 |
104 |
14 |
Real Madrid |
Spain |
838 |
756 |
867 |
11 |
639 |
199 |
31 |
Barcelona |
Spain |
814 |
672 |
920 |
21 |
468 |
346 |
74 |
Manchester United |
England |
792 |
907 |
813 |
(13) |
893 |
(100) |
(11) |
Tottenham Hotspur |
England |
685 |
697 |
756 |
(2) |
439 |
246 |
56 |
Arsenal |
England |
666 |
564 |
625 |
18 |
493 |
173 |
35 |
Atlético Madrid |
Spain |
612 |
746 |
731 |
(18) |
527 |
85 |
16 |
Internazionale |
Italy |
593 |
526 |
698 |
13 |
294 |
299 |
102 |
AC Milan |
Italy |
551 |
477 |
410 |
15 |
240 |
311 |
130 |
Aston Villa |
England |
506 |
413 |
307 |
22 |
356 |
57 |
16 |
Juventus |
Italy |
502 |
603 |
690 |
(17) |
436 |
66 |
15 |
RB Leipzig |
Germany |
485 |
498 |
521 |
(3) |
256 |
229 |
89 |
Borussia Dortmund |
Germany |
483 |
604 |
587 |
(20) |
340 |
143 |
42 |
Napoli |
Italy |
481 |
519 |
594 |
(7) |
333 |
147 |
44 |
West Ham United |
England |
472 |
354 |
271 |
33 |
376 |
(22) |
(6) |
Bayern Leverkusen |
Germany |
470 |
387 |
255 |
21 |
245 |
142 |
58 |
The current first-team squad has 31 players. Following the significant sales of Jadon Sancho in the summer of 2021 and Erling Haaland in the summer of 2022, the estimated value of the squad is more balanced than it has been; the current highest-valued player is Jude Bellingham at €90m, c 19% of the total squad’s value. In recent months, several newspaper articles have indicated a high level of interest from other European clubs (Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City and Real Madrid) in signing Bellingham in the summer 2023 transfer window. We believe Bellingham does not have a release clause in his contract, as we believe Haaland had, so the club may achieve a selling price for Bellingham that is closer to his estimated market value in a potential bidding war between the major clubs.
The main new additions to the first-team squad, involving a transfer fee, in the current season have been: Haller (centre forward for €31m from Ajax), Adeyemi (right wing for €30m from RB Salzburg); Schlotterbeck (centre back for €20m from SC Freiburg), Modeste (centre forward for €5m from FC Kőln) and Őzcan (midfield for €5m from FC Kőln). In FY22/23 to determine whether there is any bias in the estimated valuations of players versus eventual transfer fees, we have examined all of Borussia Dortmund’s transfers during the last six years and compared the fee to estimated value. Over this period, the fees realised were 9% higher than estimated market values, with a wide range of apparent under and over valuations for individual players. The average can, naturally, be skewed by significant one-off gains, for example Dembélé was sold in the 17/18 season for €135m versus an estimated market value of €33m, but Haaland was sold for €60m versus his estimated market value of €150m. Excluding these two transfers, the cumulative realised transfer fees were 10% higher than the estimated market values. Therefore, we believe the estimated market values are a reasonable proxy for the aggregate squad valuation over the long term.
At the end of June 2022, the weighted average remaining contract terms was 3.55 years (2.44 years end June 2021). For the current squad of 31 players listed above, the expiry dates of the contracts are eight in FY23, 12 in FY24, three in FY25, five in FY26, and two in FY27, and one has no expiry date.
We have highlighted the growth drivers of Borussia Dortmund’s revenues in the individual sections above.
Exhibit 12: Revenue and EBITDA profile
|
|
Source: Borussia Dortmund, Edison Investment Research
|
Following a challenging FY20 and FY21, which were both heavily affected by COVID-19-related disruptions, Borussia Dortmund’s FY22 revenue grew by c 5% y-o-y to €352m (FY21 €334m), EBITDA more than doubled to €81m (FY21 €39m), and the net loss improved to €35m versus €73m in the prior year. Management’s guidance at the start of the period was for revenue of €374m, EBITDA of €92–97m, and a net loss of €12–17m. As the year progressed, guidance was reduced on two occasions. The first downgrade, in February 2022, to an expected loss of €17–24m reflected the unexpected disruption of the Omicron strain of COVID-19, and the relatively poor performance on the pitch (elimination from Champions League at the group stage, early exit from UEFA Europa League and early exit from DFB Cup). The second downgrade, in June 2022, incorporated the costs of replacing the previous head coach and his supporting staff.
The operating loss of €29m, was the third consecutive operating loss reported by Borussia Dortmund, solely attributable to the COVID-19-related disruptions. Total operating costs increased by 8% y-o-y in FY22, higher than the 5% reported revenue growth. The 1% decline y-o-y in depreciation and amortisation, was more than compensated for by growth in personnel expenses of 7%, and other operating expenses of 19%. The absolute growth in EBITDA of €41.9m was solely attributable to the year-on-year improvement in net transfer income of €46.5m to €61.9m, offset by the negative operational gearing above.
New forecasts: Upgrade for FY23
While recognising the potential for further COVID-19 outbreaks, the threat of a recession and the macroeconomic pressures on consumer discretionary income, management anticipates a strong improvement in FY23 results, continuing the recovery from FY22. Management’s guidance is for FY23 revenue of €394m (+12% y-o-y), EBITDA of €101–106m (growth of 25–31%), operating profit of €2–7m (FY22 €29m loss), and a net profit of €2–7m (loss of €35m in FY22). Total operating proceeds (ie including gross transfer proceeds) is guided to be €489m, c 7% higher than FY22’s €457m suggests another good year for player sales, with gross proceeds of €95m versus €105m in FY22 and an average of €91m in the last four seasons.
The key drivers to management’s expectations for improved financial performance include greater relative success on the pitch, no disruption to fan attendance due to COVID-19, and further gains in sponsorship. As ever, cost management is a priority, but more so given the expectations of greater inflationary pressures in commodity, energy and food expenses.
Our updated forecasts for FY23 and new forecasts for FY24 are shown in Exhibit 13 and are in line with management’s guidance. Our typical working assumption is the team finishes in the top four of the Bundesliga qualifies from the Champions League group stage. At the time of writing, after the fifth of six qualifying games in the Champions League, the team has qualified for the next round of the competition, the Round of 16.
Exhibit 13: Summary of new estimates
€m |
FY22 |
FY23e old |
FY23e new |
Change |
FY24e new |
Revenue |
351.6 |
389.0 |
395.0 |
1.6% |
420.5 |
Growth y-o-y |
|
10.6% |
12.3% |
|
6.4% |
- Match operations |
22.7 |
40.0 |
39.8 |
(0.5%) |
46.2 |
- Advertising |
126.1 |
128.4 |
135.0 |
5.1% |
141.7 |
- TV marketing |
145.1 |
153.9 |
151.5 |
(1.6%) |
159.4 |
- Merchandising |
31.8 |
34.6 |
35.0 |
1.0% |
36.0 |
- Conference, catering and misc. |
26.0 |
32.0 |
33.8 |
5.6% |
37.2 |
Net transfer income |
61.9 |
60.0 |
60.0 |
0.0% |
60.0 |
EBITDA |
80.8 |
106.5 |
105.9 |
(0.6%) |
120.2 |
Margin |
23.0% |
27.4% |
26.8% |
|
28.6% |
Growth y-o-y |
|
31.9% |
31.1% |
|
13.6% |
Operating income (reported) |
(29.2) |
(4.8) |
6.9 |
N/M |
12.3 |
Profit before tax (reported) |
(33.4) |
(5.8) |
6.2 |
N/M |
12.0 |
Profit after tax (reported) |
(35.1) |
(5.8) |
6.2 |
N/M |
12.0 |
EPS reported (€) |
(0.33) |
(0.05) |
0.06 |
N/M |
0.11 |
EPS normalised (€) |
0.63 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
0.1% |
0.88 |
DPS (€) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
N/M |
0.00 |
Source: Borussia Dortmund, Edison Investment Research
Our forecasts include year-on-year growth for all revenue streams. Our revenue forecasts for FY23 and FY24 of €395m and €421m compare with FY19’s pre-COVID-19 revenue of €370m. Our EBITDA forecast of €106m and €120m for FY23 and FY24 respectively compare with FY19’s EBITDA of €116m.
We assume a zero effective tax rate in FY22 and FY23 given corporate tax loss carry forwards of €155m and trade tax loss carry forwards of €127m. For normalised earnings we assume a tax rate of 8%.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, Borussia Dortmund regularly paid an annual dividend to shareholders, but the reported net loss in the last three financial years led to no dividends being paid. Management’s FY23 guidance for a net profit may lead to management considering a dividend after the period end, which we do not include for the time being.
Cash flow: Net cash position, helped by equity raise
With a more favourable backdrop than the prior year, the improved financial performance in FY21 led to better operating cash flow generation with an inflow of €35m versus €16m in FY21. This was a strong performance against management’s initial guidance of €30m, given the disruption from COVID-19. Although free cash generated remained negative, it continued to improve from the more challenging years that have followed the end of the pandemic, moving from an outflow of €51m in FY20 and outflow of €46m in FY21 to an outflow of €16m in FY22. Again, this exceeded management’s initial guidance for an outflow of €26m.
Borussia Dortmund invested a net €49m in the playing squad, slightly lower than the prior year’s €59m. We highlight that cash flows with respect to player purchases and sales will differ to the net proceeds identified earlier (Exhibit 10) as cash payments/receipts for transfers can be made/received over a number of years.
The October equity raise of €86m was partially used to repay the debt acquired since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic of €57m. By the period end, the company had a closing cash position of €11m. The only debt at the end of FY22 was IFRS16 liabilities of €17m, giving a net debt position of €7m (subject to rounding).
For FY23, management has guided to operating cash flow of €45m (Edison forecast €49m), €10m higher than what was generated in FY22, and free cash flow of zero, implying investment in fixed and intangible assets of €45m.
Balance sheet: Asset heavy
Borussia Dortmund’s net assets increased to €281m at the end of FY22 as the October 2021 equity raise offset the reported net loss. The most significant assets on the balance sheet at the end of June 2022 were the playing squad with a net book value of €124m, well below the estimated market values and fixed assets, including the stadium, with a net book value of €172m.